Literature DB >> 3588708

Taste effectiveness of some D- and L-amino acids in mice.

T Kasahara, K Iwasaki, M Sato.   

Abstract

To measure the hedonic effectiveness of some D-amino acids two-bottle preference tests were carried out on ddy mice, and subsequently conditioned taste aversion (CTA) experiments were performed to determine to what degree hedonic responses to D- and L-amino acids are related to sweet taste in mice. Mice showed preferences for D-Trp, D-His, and D-Leu over certain concentration ranges, but were behaviorally neutral to D-Ser and D-Val up to 0.1 M. The preference magnitudes for D-amino acids increased with increasing molecular weight (MW) or the bulk of the side chain. CTA experiments using 0.2 M sucrose as a conditioning stimulus and 4 D- and 6 L-amino acids as test stimuli indicated that generalization of sucrose taste became stronger with increasing MW of D-amino acids and decreasing MW of L-amino acids. There was a highly significant positive correlation between the degree of generalization of sucrose taste and the preference magnitude for D- and L-amino acids. The results indicate that preferences for D- and L-amino acids in mice result from sweet taste produced by these chemicals. Comparison of the results with the human psychophysical data reveal similarity between humans and ddy mice in taste sensitivity to amino acids.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3588708     DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(87)90162-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  11 in total

1.  d-Leucine: Evaluation in an epilepsy model.

Authors:  Kylie Holden; Adam L Hartman
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.937

2.  Whole nerve chorda tympani responses to sweeteners in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  M Inoue; S A McCaughey; A A Bachmanov; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.160

3.  Is glycine "sweet" to mice? Mouse strain differences in perception of glycine taste.

Authors:  Satoshi Manita; Alexander A Bachmanov; Xia Li; Gary K Beauchamp; Masashi Inoue
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-08-08

5.  Stereoselective detection of amino acids by lobster olfactory receptor neurons.

Authors:  W C Michel; H G Trapido-Rosenthal; E T Chao; M Wachowiak
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Allelic variation of the Tas1r3 taste receptor gene selectively affects behavioral and neural taste responses to sweeteners in the F2 hybrids between C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  Masashi Inoue; Danielle R Reed; Xia Li; Michael G Tordoff; Gary K Beauchamp; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Greater superficial petrosal nerve transection in rats does not change unconditioned licking responses to putatively sweet taste stimuli.

Authors:  Enshe Jiang; Ginger Blonde; Mircea Garcea; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 8.  Genetics of Amino Acid Taste and Appetite.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Natalia P Bosak; John I Glendinning; Masashi Inoue; Xia Li; Satoshi Manita; Stuart A McCaughey; Yuko Murata; Danielle R Reed; Michael G Tordoff; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 8.701

9.  Detection of maltodextrin and its discrimination from sucrose are independent of the T1R2 + T1R3 heterodimer.

Authors:  Kimberly R Smith; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.619

10.  Taste quality and intensity of 100 stimuli as reported by rats: the taste-location association task.

Authors:  Shree Hari Gautam; Michelle R Rebello; Justus V Verhagen
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.558

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.