| Literature DB >> 35886357 |
Zhe Huang1, Emily Ying-Yang Chan1,2, Chi-Shing Wong1, Sida Liu1,2, Benny Chung-Ying Zee3,4.
Abstract
Whereas previous studies have assessed the overall health impact of temperature in Hong Kong, the aim of this study was to investigate whether the health impact is modified by local temperature of small geographic units, which may be related to the diverse socioeconomic characteristics of these units. The effects of local temperature on non-accidental and cause-specific mortality were analyzed using Bayesian spatial models at a small-area level, adjusting for potential confounders, i.e., area-level air pollutants, socioeconomic status, and green space, as well as spatial dependency. We found that a 10% increase in green space density was associated with an estimated 4.80% decrease in non-accidental mortality risk and a 5.75% decrease in cardiovascular disease mortality risk in Hong Kong, whereas variation in local annual temperature did not significantly contribute to mortality. We also found that the spatial variation of mortality within this city could be explained by the geographic distribution of green space and socioeconomic factors rather than local temperature or air pollution. The findings and methodology of this study may help to further understanding and investigation of social and structural determinants of health disparities, particularly place-based built environment across class-based small geographic units in a city, taking into account the intersection of multiple factors from individual to population levels.Entities:
Keywords: Bayesian spatial analysis; Hong Kong; green space; local temperature; mortality; social and structural determinants of health disparities
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35886357 PMCID: PMC9322054 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19148506
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1Locations of TPU centroids, weather, and air quality monitoring stations.
(a) and (b): Descriptive statistics and Pearson correlations of socioeconomic variables and environmental exposures in Hong Kong in 2016.
| (a) Descriptive Statistics | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area-Level Characteristic | Minimum | 25th Percentile | Median | 75th Percentile | Maximum | ||||||||||
| Indigenous degree score | −4.5 | −0.4 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 1.2 | ||||||||||
| Family resilience score | −4.2 | −0.4 | 0.2 | 0.5 | 2.4 | ||||||||||
| Individual productivity score | −3 | −0.6 | 0.1 | 0.6 | 3.1 | ||||||||||
| Populous grassroots score | −2.8 | −0.8 | 0 | 0.8 | 2.6 | ||||||||||
| Young-age score | −2.4 | −0.6 | −0.2 | 0.5 | 5.4 | ||||||||||
| PM2.5 (µg/m3) | 18.5 | 20.0 | 21.5 | 22.9 | 27.0 | ||||||||||
| NO2 (µg/m3) | 14.0 | 37.5 | 45.6 | 56.5 | 58.9 | ||||||||||
| O3 (µg/m3) | 32.0 | 33.0 | 41.1 | 43.5 | 62.5 | ||||||||||
| PM10 (µg/m3) | 28.4 | 30.6 | 32.0 | 34.3 | 43.7 | ||||||||||
| SO2 (µg/m3) | 4.6 | 6.1 | 9.3 | 9.8 | 11.6 | ||||||||||
| Minimum temperature (°C) | 19.6 | 20.6 | 21.0 | 21.3 | 22.0 | ||||||||||
| Rain (mm) | 2158 | 2579 | 2857 | 3033 | 3464 | ||||||||||
| Dew temperature (°C) | 18.8 | 19.1 | 19.4 | 19.8 | 20.3 | ||||||||||
| Relative humidity (%) | 72.9 | 78.9 | 80.5 | 81.6 | 85.5 | ||||||||||
| Green space density (%) | 0.0 | 3.4 | 32.4 | 57.0 | 93.3 | ||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| PC 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
| PC 2 | 0 | 1 | |||||||||||||
| PC 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| PC 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||||||||||
| PC 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||||||||||
| PM2.5 | 0.2 | −0.08 | −0.1 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 1 | |||||||||
| NO2 | 0.11 | −0.1 | 0.15 | 0.2 | −0.06 | 0.6 | 1 | ||||||||
| O3 | −0.23 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.02 | −0.03 | −0.77 | −0.75 | 1 | |||||||
| PM10 | 0.18 | −0.07 | −0.09 | 0 | 0.14 | 0.91 | 0.5 | −0.55 | 1 | ||||||
| SO2 | 0.02 | −0.14 | −0.01 | −0.01 | 0 | 0.66 | 0.54 | −0.71 | 0.59 | 1 | |||||
| min.T | −0.28 | −0.26 | 0.3 | 0.34 | −0.17 | 0.04 | 0.39 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 1 | ||||
| Rain | −0.05 | 0.03 | 0.27 | 0.15 | −0.11 | −0.36 | −0.05 | 0.22 | −0.45 | −0.44 | 0.18 | 1 | |||
| dew.T | −0.16 | −0.29 | 0.13 | 0 | −0.14 | −0.25 | −0.27 | 0.44 | −0.1 | −0.17 | 0.2 | −0.09 | 1 | ||
| RH | 0.08 | −0.01 | −0.06 | −0.07 | 0.01 | −0.34 | −0.41 | 0.44 | −0.18 | −0.28 | −0.37 | −0.01 | 0.64 | 1 | |
| GS | −0.2 | 0.37 | −0.21 | −0.11 | 0.07 | −0.29 | −0.41 | 0.31 | −0.22 | −0.1 | −0.31 | −0.17 | 0.06 | 0.28 | 1 |
Note: The table cells shaded in grey indicate that the p-value of the corresponding correlation coefficient was less than 0.05. PC 1: indigenous degree score; PC 2: family resilience score; PC 3: individual productivity score; PC 4: populous grassroots score; PC 5: young-age score; min.T: minimum temperature; dew.T: dew temperature; RH: relative humidity; GS: green space density.
Figure 2Environmental exposures in Hong Kong in 2016. Note: (a) minimum temperature (°C); (b) green space density (%); (c) NO2 (µg/m3).
Figure 3Non-accidental mortality and crude relative risk of mortality in Hong Kong in 2016. Note: a five-level scale is used to provide a balance between differentiation and clarity.
Figure 4Spatial autocorrelation of non-accidental mortality in Hong Kong. Note: (a) the x-axis represents values in area i, whereas the y-axis represents the spatially weighted sums of values in the neighborhood of location i. Diamond-shaped points are areas whose local relationships influenced the slope of the straight line more than proportionately; the numbers above the diamonds are their TPU IDs. (b) High-High indicates that the mortality of the area and the average of its neighbors were higher than the global mean; High-Low indicates that the mortality of the area was higher than the global mean but that the average mortality of its neighbors was lower than the mean (Low-High indicates the inverse).
Figure 5Cancer, respiratory disease, and cardiovascular disease mortalities and crude relative risk of mortality in Hong Kong in 2016.
Summary statistics for the posterior mean and 95% credible interval for the regression coefficients of the negative binomial regression models with respect to the four types of mortality.
| Non-Accidental Mortality (44,543 Cases) | Cancer Mortality (14,175 Cases) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariable | Multivariable (∆DIC = −38.0) | Univariable | Multivariable (∆DIC = −47.2) | |||||||||
| Mean | Lower | Upper | Mean | Lower | Upper | Mean | Lower | Upper | Mean | Lower | Upper | |
| Intercept | −6.756 | −12.788 | −0.748 | −8.04 | −13.781 | −2.339 | ||||||
| Indigenous degree | 0.104 | −0.046 | 0.254 | 0.124 | −0.015 | 0.262 | ||||||
| Family resilience | −0.158 | −0.319 | 0.002 | −0.167 | −0.314 | −0.020 | −0.084 | −0.213 | 0.045 | |||
| Individual productivity | −0.109 | −0.266 | 0.048 | −0.101 | −0.245 | 0.045 | ||||||
| Populous grassroots | 0.487 | 0.350 | 0.626 | 0.443 | 0.313 | 0.757 | 0.468 | 0.340 | 0.599 | 0.437 | 0.314 | 0.561 |
| Young age | −0.427 | −0.56 | −0.29 | −0.429 | −0.553 | −0.305 | −0.381 | −0.509 | −0.256 | −0.384 | −0.502 | −0.267 |
| NO2 | 0.026 | 0.006 | 0.045 | 0.011 | −0.004 | 0.026 | 0.024 | 0.006 | 0.041 | 0.010 | −0.004 | 0.023 |
| Minimum temperature | 0.562 | 0.206 | 0.918 | 0.034 | −0.259 | 0.326 | 0.555 | 0.232 | 0.877 | 0.044 | −0.234 | 0.323 |
| Green space density | −0.860 | −1.396 | −0.328 | −0.492 | −0.944 | −0.041 | −0.781 | −1.278 | −0.291 | −0.342 | −0.795 | 0.108 |
| Respiratory disease mortality (10,682 cases) | Cardiovascular disease mortality (9969 cases) | |||||||||||
| Univariable | Multivariable (∆DIC = −32.1) | Univariable | Multivariable (∆DIC = −36.4) | |||||||||
| Mean | Lower | Upper | Mean | Lower | Upper | Mean | Lower | Upper | Mean | Lower | Upper | |
| Intercept | −9.09 | −17.18 | −1.042 | −6.416 | −12.344 | −0.500 | ||||||
| Indigenous degree | 0.191 | 0.023 | 0.360 | 0.115 | −0.046 | 0.279 | 0.134 | −0.011 | 0.280 | |||
| Family resilience | −0.190 | −0.370 | −0.011 | −0.049 | −0.214 | 0.119 | −0.135 | −0.286 | 0.016 | |||
| Individual productivity | −0.243 | −0.412 | −0.074 | −0.227 | −0.387 | −0.067 | −0.125 | −0.275 | 0.026 | |||
| Populous grassroots | 0.432 | 0.273 | 0.596 | 0.347 | 0.191 | 0.508 | 0.442 | 0.307 | 0.582 | 0.411 | 0.281 | 0.545 |
| Young age | −0.400 | −0.555 | −0.247 | −0.404 | −0.551 | −0.260 | −0.373 | −0.507 | −0.242 | −0.384 | −0.510 | −0.260 |
| NO2 | 0.029 | 0.013 | 0.046 | 0.013 | −0.004 | 0.031 | 0.025 | 0.011 | 0.040 | 0.010 | −0.004 | 0.025 |
| Minimum temperature | 0.482 | 0.158 | 0.810 | −0.073 | −0.320 | 0.467 | 0.389 | 0.055 | 0.726 | −0.048 | −0.336 | 0.240 |
| Green space density | −1.058 | −1.598 | −0.525 | −0.552 | −0.836 | −0.268 | −0.883 | −1.395 | −0.379 | −0.592 | −1.045 | −0.141 |
Note: Variables of the annual average of PM10, PM2.5, O3, SO2, rainfall, dew point temperature, and relative humidity were not significant in any of the univariable models. ∆DIC indicates the difference of DIC between the multivariable model and the corresponding model with the intercept, offset term, and random effects. Table cells shaded in grey indicate that the association was statistically significant.
Figure 6Posterior means of the relative risks for non-accidental mortality obtained with the multivariable model using INLA.