| Literature DB >> 33036459 |
Sida Liu1,2, Emily Yang Ying Chan1,2, William Bernard Goggins2, Zhe Huang1,2.
Abstract
(1) Background: The adverse health effect associated with extreme temperature has been extensively reported in the current literature. Some also found that temperature effect may vary among the population with different socioeconomic status (SES), but found inconsistent results. Previous studies on the socioeconomic vulnerability of temperature effect were mainly achieved by multi-city or country analysis, but the large heterogeneity between cities may introduce additional bias to the estimation. The linkage between death registry and census in Hong Kong allows us to perform a city-wide analysis in which the study population shares virtually the same cultural, lifestyle and policy environment. This study aims to examine and compare the high and low temperature on morality in Hong Kong, a city with a subtropical climate and address a key research question of whether the extreme high and low temperature disproportionally affects population with lower SES. (2)Entities:
Keywords: H-EDRM; climate change; extreme temperature; health disparities; socioeconomic vulnerability
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33036459 PMCID: PMC7579344 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17197326
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The geographical distribution of socioeconomic status (SES) groups by median monthly household income of tertiary planning units (TPUs) in Hong Kong, where One = highest SES, shown in green and Four = lowest SES, shown in red).
Descriptive statistics of metalogical and air pollutant variables.
| Percentile | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Mean | Min | 5th | 25th | 50th | 75th | 95th | Max |
| Mean Temperature (°C) | 23.5 | 8.4 | 14.2 | 19.2 | 24.7 | 28.1 | 30.0 | 32.4 |
| Mean Relative Humidity (%) | 78.1 | 29.0 | 58.0 | 73.0 | 79.0 | 85.0 | 95.0 | 99.0 |
| Atmospheric pressure (hPa) | 1012.7 | 992.2 | 1002.6 | 1007.9 | 1012.7 | 1017.7 | 1023.1 | 1029.8 |
| NO2 (μg/m3) | 41.2 | 11.4 | 28.2 | 38.3 | 48.4 | 61 | 83.8 | 152.5 |
| O3 (μg/m3) | 51.2 | 4.9 | 13.6 | 21.7 | 36.9 | 56.1 | 85.4 | 139.3 |
| SO2 (μg/m3) | 13.9 | 3.2 | 5.6 | 8.4 | 11.8 | 16.9 | 28.9 | 80.6 |
| PM2.5 (μg/m3) | 31.4 | 4.9 | 9.2 | 15.8 | 27.5 | 42.5 | 67.5 | 138.5 |
Descriptive statistics of daily mortality count in the study period.
| SES Groups | Percentile | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min | 5th | 25th | 50th | 75th | 95th | Max | Total | |
| One—Highest SES | 0 | 4 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 15 | 26 | 30,169 |
| Two | 3 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 21 | 26 | 38 | 63,808 |
| Three | 6 | 23 | 30 | 34 | 39 | 47 | 67 | 125,750 |
| Four—Lowest SES | 14 | 34 | 42 | 48 | 55 | 67 | 92 | 143,230 |
| Total | 31 | 86 | 99 | 109 | 120 | 143 | 192 | 362,957 |
Figure 2The cumulative effect (lag 0–21 days) of daily mean temperature on non-accidental mortality during 2007 and 2015 with the distribution of daily mean temperature at the bottom (number of days). The dashed in the middle indicates the minimum mortality temperature (28.9 °C) the two vertical lines on the sides indicates the 2.5th (12.9 °C) and 97.5th (30.3 °C) percentile of the daily temperature during study period.
Figure 3The Lag–response effect distribution during the 21 days lag period after exposed to a low (12.9 °C, 2.5th percentile) and high (30.3 °C, 97.5th percentile) temperature compared to reference temperature (27 °C).
The relative risk (RR) for cold (12.9 °C, 2.5th percentile at lag 0–21) and heat effect (30.3 °C, 97.5th percentile at lag 0–3) compared to 27 °C with 95% confidence interval.
| Non-Accidental | Cardiovascular | Respiratory | Cancer | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SES Group | Cold | Heat | Cold | Heat | Cold | Heat | Cold | Heat |
| One | 1.622 * | 1.031 | 2.026 * | 0.998 | 2.009 * | 0.921 | 0.976 | 1.080 |
| Two | 1.518 * | 1.036 | 1.893 * | 1.043 | 1.851 * | 1.023 | 1.009 | 1.072 |
| Three | 1.457 * | 1.039 * | 1.748 * | 1.000 | 1.575 * | 1.058 | 1.094 | 1.012 |
| Four | 1.506 * | 1.040* | 1.888 * | 1.030 | 1.626 * | 1.099 * | 1.142 * | 1.008 |
| All | 1.463 * | 1.035 * | 1.794 * | 1.004 | 1.525 * | 1.049 * | 1.081 * | 1.025 |
* Statistically significant at α ≤ 0.05.
Figure 4The cold (12.9 °C, 2.5th percentile at lag 0–21) and heat effect (30.3 °C, 97.5th percentile at lag 0–3) compared to 27 °C by cause of death and SES groups (where One = the highest SES, Four = lowest SES).
Figure 5The cold (12.9 °C, 2.5th at lag 0–21) and heat effect (30.3 °C, 97.5th at lag 0–3) on non-accidental deaths compared to 27 °C by age, gender and SES groups where One = the highest SES, Four = the lowest SES.