| Literature DB >> 28765127 |
Dan Wang1,2, Kevin Ka-Lun Lau2,3,4, Ruby Yu2,5, Samuel Y S Wong1,6, Timothy T Y Kwok2,5, Jean Woo2,5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Green space has been shown to be beneficial for human wellness through multiple pathways. This study aimed to explore the contributions of neighbouring green space to cause-specific mortality.Entities:
Keywords: Age-friendly; Ageing in place; Elderly; Green space; Mortality; NDVI.
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28765127 PMCID: PMC5642810 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015794
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Figure 1Flow chart of recruitment at baseline (2001–2004).
Number of deaths according to specific causes of death and the corresponding percentage divided by all-cause deaths for the cohort of 3544 elderly subjects, Hong Kong, 2001–2014
| Cause | ICD-10 | All subjects | Males | Females |
| All causes | All | 795 (22.4%)* | 515 (29.0%)* | 280 (15.8%)* |
| Neoplasms | C00-D48 | 313 (39.4%) | 202 (39.2%) | 111 (39.6%) |
| Diseases of the respiratory system | J00-J99 | 150 (18.9%) | 105 (20.3%) | 45 (16.0%) |
| Diseases of the circulatory system | I00-I99 | 182 (22.9%) | 115 (22.3%) | 67 (23.9%) |
| IHD/AMI-caused | I219, 249, 251, 259 | 75 (9.4%) | 46 (8.9%) | 27 (9.6%) |
| Stroke-caused | I64, 609, 613–615, 619, 620, 629, 634, 639 | 49 (6.2%) | 30 (5.8%) | 19 (6.7%) |
*Number of all-cause mortality (mortality ratio), among all subjects, males and females.
AMI, acute myocardial infarction; ICD, International classification of diseases; IHD, ischaemic heart disease.
Descriptive characteristics of the study population and percentage of green space coverage within neighbouring buffer (radius=300 m) at baseline (n=3544)
| Number of subjects | Total months of follow-up | Coverage of green space (%) | ||||
| N (%) | Median | Median | Correlation coefficient | Median | Correlation coefficient | |
| Overall subjects | 3544 (100%) | 133.32 (14.2) | 13.36 (29.1) | |||
| Demographics | ||||||
| Sex | ||||||
| Male | 1773 (50.0) | 137.2 (13.9) | 12.25 (29.1) | |||
| Female | 1771 (49.9) | 128.4 (9.2) | 14.16 (29.9) | |||
| Age (years) | 72.2 (5.0) | −0.25 | 0.01 | |||
| 65–70 | 1550 (43.8) | 135.0 (13.8)* | 13.13 (28.7) | |||
| 71–75 | 1111 (31.4) | 134.0 (13.0) | 13.21 (30.1) | |||
| 76–80 | 654 (18.4) | 127.7 (26.3) | 13.64 (31.1) | |||
| 81–85 | 181 (5.1) | 122.5 (51.3) | 13.13 (28.7) | |||
| ≥86 | 48 (1.3) | 110.6 (53.1) | 17.58 (35.0) | |||
| Marital status | ||||||
| Married | 2546 (71.9) | 135.3 (13.9)* | 12.85 (29.2) | |||
| Widowed | 849 (23.9) | 127.5 (8.0) | 14.16 (29.0) | |||
| Separated or divorced | 79 (2.2) | 128.7 (16.7) | 16.63 (37.7) | |||
| Single (never married) | 70 (2.0) | 126.9 (48.9) | 16.23 (30.7) | |||
| Years lived in Hong Kong | 52.7 (14.9) | −0.05* | −0.02 | |||
| Socioeconomics | ||||||
| Education Level | ||||||
| Not educated | 743 (20.9) | 128.4 (10.2)* | 16.07 (28.6) | |||
| Primary school not completed | 1164 (32.8) | 132.8 (14.2) | 13.60 (31.2) | |||
| Primary school graduated | 606 (17.2) | 134.0 (14.9) | 12.93 (31.9) | |||
| Secondary school | 679 (17.1) | 135.8 (14.6) | 11.46 (25.5) | |||
| University or above | 352 (9.9) | 135.8 (12.4) | 9.11 (23.8) | |||
| Socioeconomic ladder | ||||||
| Low (1–3) | 973 (27.4) | 134.4 (16.1) | 13.37 (30.3)† | |||
| Medium (4–6) | 2142 (60.5) | 132.9 (13.7) | 13.13 (29.2) | |||
| High (7–10) | 429 (12.1) | 133.4 (12.3) | 13.37 (27.5) | |||
| Lifestyle factors | ||||||
| Smoking | ||||||
| Non-smoker | 2259 (63.8) | 127.7 (11.8)* | 13.29 (28.5) | |||
| Past-smoker | 1046 (29.5) | 136.0 (24.3) | 13.37 (30.6) | |||
| Current-smoker | 239 (6.7) | 135.4 (23.4) | 14.16 (32.6) | |||
| Alcohol intake | ||||||
| Intake≤12 drinks during the past 12 months | 3069 (86.6) | 132.6 (13.6)† | 13.37 (29.3) | |||
| Intake>12 drinks during the past 12 months | 475 (13.4) | 137.2 (10.6) | 12.41 (27.2) | |||
| DQI-I | 64.45 (9.5) | 0.08* | −0.03† | |||
| PASE | 91.9 (43.0) | 0.14 | 0.01 | |||
| Health conditions | ||||||
| MMSE | 25.7 (3.6) | 0.11* | −0.13 | |||
| MCS | 55.5 (7.2) | −0.01 | 0.01 | |||
| Self-rated health | ||||||
| Very good | 335 (9.5) | 136.0 (14.5)* | 12.65 (29.8) | |||
| Good | 1354 (38.2) | 134.2 (14.3) | 12.65 (29.0) | |||
| Fair | 1607 (45.3) | 131.5 (13.3) | 14.48 (29.6) | |||
| Substandard | 220 (6.2) | 128.7 (12.3) | 12.29 (26.7) | |||
| Poor | 28 (0.8) | 127.2 (37.1) | 15.16 (31.6) | |||
| Environmental factors | ||||||
| Housing type | ||||||
| Private housing | 1521 (42.9) | 134.2 (13.5) | 12.65 (29.4) | |||
| Public housing | 2023 (57.1) | 132.6 (14.8) | 13.68 (29.7) | |||
| Highway proximity (m) | 138.9 (202.1) | −0.01 | 0.16* | |||
| PM2.5 concentration (µg/m3) | 32.4 (2.6) | −0.04† | −0.45* | |||
| Average building density (%) | 34.8 (9.8) | 0.01 | −0.65* | |||
| Absolute living height (m) | 112.9 (88.2) | −0.01 | 0.46* | |||
For categorical characteristics, the number of subjects n (% divided by the total N), the average follow-up duration and coverage of green space for each category are shown as median (IQR). For continuous variables, the average level of continuous variables for all subjects is presented as mean (SD) or median (IQR) if non-normal distribution was observed; their correlation with follow-up duration or coverage of green space is reported using Spearman's correlation coefficient.
*Difference between groups or correlation with a continuous variable is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).
†Difference between groups or correlation with a continuous variable is significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).
DQI, Diet Quality Index-International; MCS, The mental component of SF-12; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; PASE, Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly.
Multivariate-adjusted HRs and 95% CIs of all-cause and cause-specific mortality with every 10% increase in coverage of green space within a 300 m radius buffer
| HR (95% CI), adjusted for demographic, socioeconomic, lifestyle factors, baseline health status, housing type and years lived in HK | ||
| Outcomes | Model 1* | Model 2† |
| Green space (10%) | Green space (10%) | |
| All-cause mortality | 0.963 (0.930 to 0.998)‡ | 0.964 (0.931 to 0.999)‡ |
| Respiratory disease-caused mortality | 1.003 (0.927 to 1.086) | 1.004 (0.928 to 1.087) |
| Circulatory disease-caused mortality | 0.887 (0.817 to 0.963)§ | 0.888 (0.817 to 0.964)§ |
| IHD/AMI | 0.912 (0.805 to 1.033) | 0.912 (0.805 to 1.033) |
| Stroke | 0.661 (0.524 to 0.835)§ | 0.658 (0.519 to 0.833)§ |
HR by Cox proportional regression with specific mortality as the dependent variable; coverage of green space is the primary independent variable.
* Model 1 was established to evaluate the overall effect of green space, controlling for demographic factors(age, sex, marital status, years lived in Hong Kong), socioeconomics(education level, subjective social economic status ladder), lifestyle factors(smoking, alcohol intake, diet quality), baseline health status and housing type
†Model 2 was developed based on the basic model, with PASE and MMSE added.
‡Significant at the 0.05 level (two-tailed).
§Significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).
AMI, acute myocardial infarction; IHD, ischaemic heart disease; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; PASE, Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly.
Figure 2Multivariate-adjusted HRs and 95% CIs of all-cause, respiratory system, circulatory system, ischaemic heart disease (IDH) or acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke-caused mortality with every 10% increase in coverage of green space within a 300 m radius buffer.