Richard G Wilkinson1, Kate E Pickett. 1. Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham Medical School, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK. richard.wilkinson@nottingham.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether the processes underlying the association between income inequality and population health are related to those responsible for the socioeconomic gradient in health and whether health disparities are smaller when income differences are narrower. METHODS: We used multilevel models in a regression analysis of 10 age- and cause-specific US county mortality rates on county median household incomes and on state income inequality. We assessed whether mortality rates more closely related to county income were also more closely related to state income inequality. We also compared mortality gradients in more- and less-equal states. RESULTS: Mortality rates more strongly associated with county income were more strongly associated with state income inequality: across all mortality rates, r= -0.81; P=.004. The effect of state income inequality on the socioeconomic gradient in health varied by cause of death, but greater equality usually benefited both wealthier and poorer counties. CONCLUSIONS: Although mortality rates with steep socioeconomic gradients were more sensitive to income distribution than were rates with flatter gradients, narrower income differences benefit people in both wealthy and poor areas and may, paradoxically, do little to reduce health disparities.
OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether the processes underlying the association between income inequality and population health are related to those responsible for the socioeconomic gradient in health and whether health disparities are smaller when income differences are narrower. METHODS: We used multilevel models in a regression analysis of 10 age- and cause-specific US county mortality rates on county median household incomes and on state income inequality. We assessed whether mortality rates more closely related to county income were also more closely related to state income inequality. We also compared mortality gradients in more- and less-equal states. RESULTS: Mortality rates more strongly associated with county income were more strongly associated with state income inequality: across all mortality rates, r= -0.81; P=.004. The effect of state income inequality on the socioeconomic gradient in health varied by cause of death, but greater equality usually benefited both wealthier and poorer counties. CONCLUSIONS: Although mortality rates with steep socioeconomic gradients were more sensitive to income distribution than were rates with flatter gradients, narrower income differences benefit people in both wealthy and poor areas and may, paradoxically, do little to reduce health disparities.
Authors: John Lynch; George Davey Smith; Sam Harper; Marianne Hillemeier; Nancy Ross; George A Kaplan; Michael Wolfson Journal: Milbank Q Date: 2004 Impact factor: 4.911
Authors: A E Cavelaars; A E Kunst; J J Geurts; R Crialesi; L Grötvedt; U Helmert; E Lahelma; O Lundberg; J Matheson; A Mielck; A Mizrahi; A Mizrahi; N K Rasmussen; E Regidor; T Spuhler; J P Mackenbach Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 1998-04 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Roman Pabayo; Alexandre D P Chiavegatto Filho; Maria Lúcia Lebrão; Ichiro Kawachi Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-07-18 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Andrea S Christopher; David U Himmelstein; Steffie Woolhandler; Danny McCormick Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2018-01-18 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Uchechukwu K A Sampson; Todd L Edwards; Eiman Jahangir; Heather Munro; Minaba Wariboko; Mariam G Wassef; Sergio Fazio; George A Mensah; Edmond K Kabagambe; William J Blot; Loren Lipworth Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2013-12-23