Literature DB >> 18994663

Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study.

Richard Mitchell1, Frank Popham.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that exposure to the natural environment, or so-called green space, has an independent effect on health and health-related behaviours. We postulated that income-related inequality in health would be less pronounced in populations with greater exposure to green space, since access to such areas can modify pathways through which low socioeconomic position can lead to disease.
METHODS: We classified the population of England at younger than retirement age (n=40 813 236) into groups on the basis of income deprivation and exposure to green space. We obtained individual mortality records (n=366 348) to establish whether the association between income deprivation, all-cause mortality, and cause-specific mortality (circulatory disease, lung cancer, and intentional self-harm) in 2001-05, varied by exposure to green space measured in 2001, with control for potential confounding factors. We used stratified models to identify the nature of this variation.
FINDINGS: The association between income deprivation and mortality differed significantly across the groups of exposure to green space for mortality from all causes (p<0.0001) and circulatory disease (p=0.0212), but not from lung cancer or intentional self-harm. Health inequalities related to income deprivation in all-cause mortality and mortality from circulatory diseases were lower in populations living in the greenest areas. The incidence rate ratio (IRR) for all-cause mortality for the most income deprived quartile compared with the least deprived was 1.93 (95% CI 1.86-2.01) in the least green areas, whereas it was 1.43 (1.34-1.53) in the most green. For circulatory diseases, the IRR was 2.19 (2.04-2.34) in the least green areas and 1.54 (1.38-1.73) in the most green. There was no effect for causes of death unlikely to be affected by green space, such as lung cancer and intentional self-harm.
INTERPRETATION: Populations that are exposed to the greenest environments also have lowest levels of health inequality related to income deprivation. Physical environments that promote good health might be important to reduce socioeconomic health inequalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18994663     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61689-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  323 in total

1.  A difference-in-differences analysis of health, safety, and greening vacant urban space.

Authors:  Charles C Branas; Rose A Cheney; John M MacDonald; Vicky W Tam; Tara D Jackson; Thomas R Ten Have
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 2.  Nature-Based Strategies for Improving Urban Health and Safety.

Authors:  Michelle C Kondo; Eugenia C South; Charles C Branas
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.671

3.  The Benefits of Natural Environments for Physical Activity.

Authors:  Danielle F Shanahan; Lara Franco; Brenda B Lin; Kevin J Gaston; Richard A Fuller
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Perception of environmental problems and common mental disorders (CMD).

Authors:  Kátia Rocha; Katherine Pérez; Maica Rodríguez-Sanz; Jordi E Obiols; Carme Borrell
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.328

5.  An uncertain future for the UK's eco-towns.

Authors:  David Sharp
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 6.  Regulation of the immune system by biodiversity from the natural environment: an ecosystem service essential to health.

Authors:  Graham A Rook
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Approaches for incorporating environmental mixtures as mediators in mediation analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Bellavia; Tamarra James-Todd; Paige L Williams
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 9.621

8.  Including the urban heat island in spatial heat health risk assessment strategies: a case study for Birmingham, UK.

Authors:  Charlie J Tomlinson; Lee Chapman; John E Thornes; Christopher J Baker
Journal:  Int J Health Geogr       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 3.918

9.  Toward a research and action agenda on urban planning/design and health equity in cities in low and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Warren Smit; Trevor Hancock; Jacob Kumaresen; Carlos Santos-Burgoa; Raúl Sánchez-Kobashi Meneses; Sharon Friel
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.671

10.  Inverse relationship between urban green space and childhood autism in California elementary school districts.

Authors:  Jianyong Wu; Laura Jackson
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 9.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.