Literature DB >> 35855039

Radiation doses during computed tomography scan imaging in Hassan II Hospital, Agadir, Morocco.

Slimane Semghouli1, Bouchra Amaoui2, Soukaina Wakrim2.   

Abstract

Introduction: the aim of this study was to establish local Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) for four adult Computed Tomography (CT) examinations in the radiology department, Hassan II hospital of Agadir.
Methods: during this survey, we have examined the data of 200 patients at an average of 50 per localization. A General Electric 16 CT with automatic exposure control system was used to perform all CT examinations. Scanner acquisition parameters, number of series, contrast medium use, rotation time plus slice thickness, the displayed Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDIvol), and the Dose Length Product (DLP) were among the data collected for each diagnostic exam chosen. To evaluate the DRL and effective dose, the conversion factor and formalism of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) were utilized.
Results: the average effective dose (Eeff), the displayed CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose length product (DLP) were (7.28±2.35) mSv, (10.80±3.80) mGy and (428.35±138.26) mGy.cm respectively at chest CT. For abdomen-pelvis CT scan, there were (12.48±5.58) mSv, (9.30±2.99) mGy and (805.43±359.98) mGy. Those at chest abdomen-pelvic CT scan were (11.72±3.98) mSv, (10.82±2.53) mGy and (755.97±251.52) mGy.cm respectively. For lumbar CT, there were (12.12±2.32) mSv, (26.46±5.24) mGy and (787.00±149.37) mGy.cm respectively.
Conclusion: the findings of this study shows that our values are slightly higher than those of developed countries. This first-ever CT practice evaluation at Agadir's Hassan II Hospital reinforced the need for further radiology training for computed tomography practitioners on parameters influencing image quality, dose, and protocols improvement. Copyright: Slimane Semghouli et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography scan; Moroccan hospital; assessment; diagnostic reference levels; radiation risks

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35855039      PMCID: PMC9250688          DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2022.41.290.25090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pan Afr Med J


  12 in total

1.  Radiation doses in computed tomography. The increasing doses of radiation need to be controlled.

Authors:  M M Rehani; M Berry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-03-04

2.  Towards establishment of the national reference dose levels from computed tomography examinations in Tanzania.

Authors:  J E Ngaile; P Msaki; R Kazema
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 1.394

3.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

4.  Establishment of CT diagnostic reference levels in Ireland.

Authors:  S J Foley; M F McEntee; L A Rainford
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Survey of computed tomography doses and establishment of national diagnostic reference levels in the Republic of Belarus.

Authors:  S A Kharuzhyk; S A Matskevich; A E Filjustin; E V Bogushevich; S A Ugolkova
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 0.972

6.  Establishment of diagnostic reference levels for CT trunk examinations in the western region of Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Abdulaziz A Qurashi; Louise A Rainford; Shane J Foley
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 0.972

7.  Multisection computed tomography: Results from a Chinese survey on radiation dose metrics.

Authors:  Dan-Dan Zhou; Pengfei Sun; Zhifang Jia; Wanan Zhu; Guang Shi; Boyu Kong; Haifeng Wang; Huimao Zhang
Journal:  J Chin Med Assoc       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.743

8.  French diagnostic reference levels in diagnostic radiology, computed tomography and nuclear medicine: 2004-2008 review.

Authors:  P Roch; B Aubert
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 0.972

9.  [Results of the Austrian CT dose study 2010: typical effective doses of the most frequent CT examinations].

Authors:  Peter Homolka; Robert Leithner; Jochen Billinger; Michael Gruber
Journal:  Z Med Phys       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 4.820

10.  A quantitative comparison of data evaluation methods to derive diagnostic reference levels for CT from a dosimetric survey: correlation analysis compared to simple evaluation strategies.

Authors:  Robert Leithner; Peter Homolka
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 2.685

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.