| Literature DB >> 35850869 |
Qikai Wu1, Lingkai Cai1, Baorui Yuan1, Qiang Cao1, Juntao Zhuang1, Meiling Bao2, Zhen Wang2, Dexiang Feng1, Jun Tao1, Pengchao Li1, Qiang Shao3, Xiao Yang4, Qiang Lu5.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To develop and validate a preoperative cystoscopic-based predictive model for predicting postoperative high-grade bladder cancer (BCa), which could be used to guide the surgical selection and postoperative treatment strategies.Entities:
Keywords: Bladder cancer; Cystoscopic biopsy; High grade; Pathological grade; Predictive model
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35850869 PMCID: PMC9295426 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-022-01054-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Urol ISSN: 1471-2490 Impact factor: 2.090
Clinicopathological characteristics of bladder cancer patients in training and validation cohort
| Variables | Number of patients (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Training cohort | Validation cohort | ||
| Surgery option | |||
| TURBT | 246 (67.2) | 89 (84.8) | |
| RC | 120 (32.8) | 16 (15.2) | |
| Age | 0.464 | ||
| < 65 | 163 (44.5) | 51 (48.6) | |
| ≥ 65 | 203 (55.5) | 54 (51.4) | |
| Gender | 0.624 | ||
| Female | 85 (23.2) | 22 (17.6) | |
| Male | 281 (76.8) | 83 (82.4) | |
| Incidence | 0.281 | ||
| Incipient | 230 (62.8) | 72 (68.6) | |
| Recurrent | 136 (37.2) | 33 (31.4) | |
| Smoking | 0.196 | ||
| No | 274 (74.9) | 85 (81) | |
| Yes | 92 (25.1) | 20 (19) | |
| Tumor diameter | 0.338 | ||
| < 3 cm | 245 (66.9) | 65 (61.9) | |
| ≥ 3 cm | 121 (33.1) | 40 (38.1) | |
| Tumor number | 0.689 | ||
| Single | 151 (39.3) | 41 (39) | |
| Multiple | 215 (60.7) | 64 (61) | |
| Tumor pedicled | 0.179 | ||
| Yes | 144 (38.9) | 49 (46.7) | |
| No | 222 (61.1) | 56 (53.3) | |
| Tumor site | 0.064 | ||
| Single wall | 215 (58.7) | 51 (48.6) | |
| Multiple wall | 151 (41.3) | 54 (51.4) | |
| Tumor morphology | 0.305 | ||
| Cauliflower | 193 (52.7) | 49 (46.7) | |
| Seaweed | 23 (6.3) | 11 (10.5) | |
| Flat nipple | 47 (12.8) | 13 (12.4) | |
| Muscus | 25 (6.8) | 4 (3.8) | |
| Mixture | 78 (21.3) | 28 (26.7) | |
The numbers marked in bold are statistically significant, p < 0.05
Fig. 1Flow chart of the study. BCa = bladder cancer; TURBT = transurethral resection of bladder tumor; RC = radical cystectomy; CPC = clinical pathology coincidence; HGCPC = high-grade clinical pathology coincidence
Fig. 2Typical morphology image of each category for bladder cancer. A Cauliflower morphology for bladder cancer. B Seaweed morphology for bladder cancer. C Flat nipple morphology for bladder cancer. D Muscus morphology for bladder cancer. E Mixture morphology for bladder cancer
Association between clinicopathological characteristics and consistency in pathological grading pre- and postoperatively
| Variables | Cases | Pathological grade consistency | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consistent | Downgrading | Upgrading | |||
| All cases | 366 | 261 (71.3) | 33 (9.0) | 72 (19.7) | |
| Age | |||||
| < 65 | 163 (44.5) | 119 (73.0) | 20 (12.3) | 24 (14.7) | |
| ≥ 65 | 203 (55.5) | 142 (70.0) | 13 (6.4) | 48 (23.6) | |
| Gender | 0.337 | ||||
| Female | 85 (23.2) | 57 (67.1) | 11 (12.9) | 17 (20.0) | |
| Male | 281 (76.8) | 204 (72.6) | 22 (7.8) | 55 (19.6) | |
| Incidence | |||||
| Incipient | 230 (62.8) | 174 (75.6) | 11 (4.8) | 45 (19.6) | |
| Recurrent | 136 (37.2) | 87 (64.0) | 22 (16.2) | 27 (19.8) | |
| Smoking | 0.679 | ||||
| No | 274 (74.9) | 198 (72.3) | 25 (9.1) | 51 (18.6) | |
| Yes | 92 (25.1) | 72 (68.5) | 8 (8.7) | 23 (22.8) | |
| Tumor diameter | |||||
| < 3 cm | 245 (66.9) | 169 (69.0) | 30 (12.2) | 46 (18.8) | |
| ≥ 3 cm | 121 (33.1) | 92 (76.0) | 3 (2.5) | 26 (21.5) | |
| Tumor number | |||||
| Single | 151 (39.3) | 105 (69.5) | 24 (15.9) | 22 (14.6) | |
| Multiple | 215 (60.7) | 156 (72.5) | 9 (4.2) | 50 (23.3) | |
| Tumor pedicled | 0.169 | ||||
| Yes | 144 (38.9) | 98 (68.1) | 18 (12.5) | 28 (19.4) | |
| No | 222 (61.1) | 163 (73.4) | 15 (6.8) | 44 (19.8) | |
| Tumor site | |||||
| Single wall | 215 (58.7) | 153 (71.2) | 26 (12.1) | 36 (16.7) | |
| Multiple wall | 151 (41.3) | 108 (71.5) | 7 (4.6) | 36 (23.8) | |
| Tumor morphology | |||||
| Cauliflower | 193 (52.7) | 134 (69.4) | 14 (7.3) | 45 (23.3) | |
| Seaweed | 23 (6.3) | 17 (73.9) | 5 (21.7) | 1 (4.3) | |
| Flat nipple | 47 (12.8) | 31 (66.0) | 7 (14.9) | 9 (19.1) | |
| Muscus | 25 (6.8) | 19 (76.0) | 5 (20.0) | 1 (4.0) | |
| Mixture | 78 (21.3) | 60 (76.9) | 2 (2.6) | 16 (20.5) | |
The numbers marked in bold are statistically significant, p < 0.05
Correlations between the postoperative pathological grading and clinicopathological characteristics in BCa patients
| Variables | Case | Postoperative Pathological Grade | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-high grade | High grade | |||
| All cases | 366 | 156 (42.6) | 210 (57.4) | |
| Age | ||||
| < 65 | 163 (44.5) | 91 (55.8) | 72 (44.2) | |
| ≥ 65 | 203 (55.5) | 65 (32.0) | 138 (68.0) | |
| Gender | 0.232 | |||
| Female | 85 (23.2) | 41 (48.2) | 44 (51.8) | |
| Male | 281 (76.8) | 115 (40.9) | 166 (59.1) | |
| Incidence | 0.271 | |||
| Incipient | 230 (62.8) | 93 (40.4) | 137 (59.6) | |
| Recurrent | 136 (37.2) | 63 (46.3) | 73 (53.7) | |
| Smoking | 0.848 | |||
| No | 274 (74.9) | 116 (42.3) | 158 (57.7) | |
| Yes | 92 (25.1) | 40 (43.5) | 52 (56.5) | |
| Tumor size | ||||
| < 3 cm | 245 (66.9) | 126 (51.4) | 119 (48.6) | |
| ≥ 3 cm | 121 (33.1) | 30 (24.8) | 91 (75.2) | |
| Tumor number | ||||
| Single | 151 (39.3) | 88 (58.3) | 63 (41.7) | |
| Multiple | 215 (60.7) | 68 (31.6) | 147 (68.4) | |
| Tumor pedicled | ||||
| Yes | 144 (38.9) | 96 (67.5) | 48 (32.5) | |
| No | 222 (61.1) | 60 (27.0) | 162 (73.0) | |
| Tumor site | ||||
| Single wall | 215 (58.7) | 116 (54.0) | 99 (46.0) | |
| Multiple wall | 151 (41.3) | 40 (26.5) | 111 (73.5) | |
| Tumor morphology | ||||
| Cauliflower | 193 (52.7) | 85 (44.0) | 108 (56.0) | |
| Seaweed | 23 (6.3) | 22 (95.7) | 1 (4.3) | |
| Flat nipple | 47 (12.8) | 23 (48.9) | 24 (51.1) | |
| Muscus | 25 (6.8) | 16 (64.0) | 9 (36.0) | |
| Mixture | 78 (21.3) | 10 (12.8) | 68 (87.2) | |
The numbers marked in bold are statistically significant, p < 0.05
Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis of clinicopathological characteristics in predicting high-grade BCa
| Variables | Univariate | Multivariate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | HR (95% CI) | |||
| Tumor diameter (≥ 3 cm vs. < 3 cm) | 3.212 (1.982–5.205) | 3.056 (1.529–6.110) | ||
| Tumor Site (Multiple walls vs. Single wall) | 3.252 (2.073–5.100) | 2.927 (1.518–5.642) | ||
| Tumor Pedicled (Non-pedicled vs. Pedicled) | 5.400 (3.423–8.518) | 4.280 (2.059–8.899) | ||
| Tumor morphology | ||||
| (Seaweed vs. Cauliflower) | 0.036 (0.005–0.271) | 0.093 (0.011–0.785) | ||
| (Flat nipple vs. Cauliflower) | 0.821 (0.434–1.555) | 0.546 | 0.514 (0.198–1.339) | 0.173 |
| (Muscus vs. Cauliflower) | 0.443 (0.186–1.051) | 0.065 | 0.113 (0.033–0.390) | |
| (Mixture vs. Cauliflower) | 5.352 (2.600–11.018) | 2.089 (0.811–5.376) | 0.127 | |
| Cystoscopic biopsy pathology | ||||
| (High-grade vs. G0) | 33.188 (14.081–78.223) | 36.745 (13.385–100.872) | ||
| (Low-grade vs. G0) | 1.743 (0.809–3.753) | 0.135 | 2.016 (0.804–5.056) | 0.135 |
| (Low malignant potential vs. G0) | 1.281 (0.446–3.686) | 0.272 | 2.089 (0.562–7.766) | 0.272 |
| Age (≥ 65 vs. < 65) | 2.683 (1.750–4.113) | 1.747 (0.931–3.280) | 0.082 | |
| Tumor Number (Multiple vs. Single) | 3.020 (1.959–4.655) | 1.286 (0.568–2.914) | 0.546 | |
| Gender (Male vs. Female) | 1.345 (0.826–2.190) | 0.233 | ||
| Incidence (Recurrent vs. Incipient) | 0.787 (0.513–1.206) | 0.271 | ||
| Smoking (Yes vs. No) | 0.954 (0.592–1.538) | 0.848 | ||
The numbers marked in bold are statistically significant, p < 0.05
Fig. 3Forest plot of binary logistic regression analysis in BCa and ROC curve analysis for the “JSPH model” diagnostic performance