Literature DB >> 33419683

European Association of Urology (EAU) Prognostic Factor Risk Groups for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Incorporating the WHO 2004/2016 and WHO 1973 Classification Systems for Grade: An Update from the EAU NMIBC Guidelines Panel.

Richard J Sylvester1, Oscar Rodríguez2, Virginia Hernández3, Diana Turturica4, Lenka Bauerová5, Harman Max Bruins6, Johannes Bründl7, Theo H van der Kwast8, Antonin Brisuda9, José Rubio-Briones10, Maximilian Seles11, Anouk E Hentschel12, Venkata R M Kusuma13, Nicolai Huebner14, Juliette Cotte15, Laura S Mertens16, Dimitrios Volanis17, Olivier Cussenot17, Jose D Subiela Henríquez2, Enrique de la Peña18, Francesca Pisano19, Michael Pešl20, Antoine G van der Heijden21, Sonja Herdegen7, Alexandre R Zlotta22, Jaromir Hacek23, Ana Calatrava24, Sebastian Mannweiler25, Judith Bosschieter26, David Ashabere13, Andrea Haitel27, Jean-François Côté28, Soha El Sheikh29, Luca Lunelli30, Ferran Algaba31, Isabel Alemany32, Francesco Soria4, Willemien Runneboom33, Johannes Breyer7, Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen26, Carlos Llorente18, Luca Molinaro34, Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa33, Matthias Evert35, Lambertus A L M Kiemeney36, James N'Dow37, Karin Plass37, Otakar Čapoun38, Viktor Soukup38, Jose L Dominguez-Escrig39, Daniel Cohen40, Joan Palou41, Paolo Gontero42, Maximilian Burger43, Richard Zigeuner44, Amir Hugh Mostafid45, Shahrokh F Shariat46, Morgan Rouprêt47, Eva M Compérat48, Marko Babjuk46, Bas W G van Rhijn49.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The European Association of Urology (EAU) prognostic factor risk groups for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) are used to provide recommendations for patient treatment after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT). They do not, however, take into account the widely used World Health Organization (WHO) 2004/2016 grading classification and are based on patients treated in the 1980s.
OBJECTIVE: To update EAU prognostic factor risk groups using the WHO 1973 and 2004/2016 grading classifications and identify patients with the lowest and highest probabilities of progression. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Individual patient data for primary NMIBC patients were collected from the institutions of the members of the EAU NMIBC guidelines panel. INTERVENTION: Patients underwent TURBT followed by intravesical instillations at the physician's discretion. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression models were fitted to the primary endpoint, the time to progression to muscle-invasive disease or distant metastases. Patients were divided into four risk groups: low-, intermediate-, high-, and a new, very high-risk group. The probabilities of progression were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 3401 patients treated with TURBT ± intravesical chemotherapy were included. From the multivariable analyses, tumor stage, WHO 1973/2004-2016 grade, concomitant carcinoma in situ, number of tumors, tumor size, and age were used to form four risk groups for which the probability of progression at 5 yr varied from <1% to >40%. Limitations include the retrospective collection of data and the lack of central pathology review.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides updated EAU prognostic factor risk groups that can be used to inform patient treatment and follow-up. Incorporating the WHO 2004/2016 and 1973 grading classifications, a new, very high-risk group has been identified for which urologists should be prompt to assess and adapt their therapeutic strategy when necessary. PATIENT
SUMMARY: The newly updated European Association of Urology prognostic factor risk groups for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer provide an improved basis for recommending a patient's treatment and follow-up schedule.
Copyright © 2020 European Association of Urology. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Grade; Guidelines; Non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer; Prognostic factors; Progression; Risk groups; WHO 1973 2004/2016

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33419683     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  40 in total

1.  Canadian Urological Association guideline on the management of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer - Abridged version.

Authors:  Bimal Bhindi; Ronald Kool; Girish S Kulkarni; D Robert Siemens; Armen G Aprikian; Rodney H Breau; Fadi Brimo; Adrian Fairey; Christopher French; Nawar Hanna; Jonathan I Izawa; Louis Lacombe; Victor McPherson; Ricardo A Rendon; Bobby Shayegan; Alan I So; Alexandre R Zlotta; Peter C Black; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  The application value of multi-parameter cystoscope in improving the accuracy of preoperative bladder cancer grading.

Authors:  Qikai Wu; Lingkai Cai; Baorui Yuan; Qiang Cao; Juntao Zhuang; Meiling Bao; Zhen Wang; Dexiang Feng; Jun Tao; Pengchao Li; Qiang Shao; Xiao Yang; Qiang Lu
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.090

3.  Establishing the Bladder Cancer Research Centre at the University of Birmingham.

Authors:  Richard T Bryan; Roland Arnold; Farhat L Khanim; Duncan E Shepherd; Prashant Patel; Douglas G Ward
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Ellagic Acid Resensitizes Gemcitabine-Resistant Bladder Cancer Cells by Inhibiting Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Gemcitabine Transporters.

Authors:  Ying-Si Wu; Jar-Yi Ho; Cheng-Ping Yu; Chun-Jung Cho; Chia-Lun Wu; Cheng-Shuo Huang; Hong-Wei Gao; Dah-Shyong Yu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Comparative Outcomes of Primary Versus Recurrent High-risk Non-muscle-invasive and Primary Versus Secondary Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer After Radical Cystectomy: Results from a Retrospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Nico C Grossmann; Pawel Rajwa; Fahad Quhal; Frederik König; Hadi Mostafaei; Ekaterina Laukhtina; Keiichiro Mori; Satoshi Katayama; Reza Sari Motlagh; Christian D Fankhauser; Agostino Mattei; Marco Moschini; Piotr Chlosta; Bas W G van Rhijn; Jeremy Y C Teoh; Eva Compérat; Marek Babjuk; Mohammad Abufaraj; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Shahrokh F Shariat; Benjamin Pradere
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-04-01

6.  [Transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT)].

Authors:  D Oswald; M Pallauf; T R W Herrmann; C Netsch; B Becker; K Lehrich; A Miernik; D S Schöb; K D Sievert; A J Gross; J Westphal; L Lusuardi; S Deininger
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  In vitro assessment of intra-operative and post-operative environment in reducing bladder cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Ryan Tsz-Hei Tse; Hongda Zhao; Christine Yim-Ping Wong; Angel Wing-Yan Kong; Ronald Cheong-Kin Chan; Ka-Fai To; Chi-Fai Ng; Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The Clinical Impact of Tumor Grade Heterogeneity in Non-muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder.

Authors:  Meftun Culpan; Ferhat Keser; Ayberk Iplikci; Gozde Kir; Gokhan Atis; Asif Yildirim
Journal:  Medeni Med J       Date:  2021-12-19

Review 9.  The Sirenic Links between Diabetes, Obesity, and Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Emily Gill; Gurimaan Sandhu; Douglas G Ward; Claire M Perks; Richard T Bryan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  High Androgen Receptor mRNA Expression Is Associated with Improved Outcome in Patients with High-Risk Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Danijel Sikic; Helge Taubert; Ralph M Wirtz; Johannes Breyer; Markus Eckstein; Veronika Weyerer; Jennifer Kubon; Philipp Erben; Christian Bolenz; Maximilian Burger; Arndt Hartmann; Bernd Wullich; Sven Wach; Bastian Keck
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.