Eugene J Pietzak1, Aditya Bagrodia1, Eugene K Cha1, Esther N Drill2, Gopa Iyer3, Sumit Isharwal1, Irina Ostrovnaya2, Priscilla Baez1, Qiang Li1, Michael F Berger4, Ahmet Zehir4, Nikolaus Schultz5, Jonathan E Rosenberg6, Dean F Bajorin6, Guido Dalbagni1, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie4, David B Solit3, Bernard H Bochner7. 1. Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 3. Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 4. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 5. Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 6. Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 7. Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: bochnerb@MSKCC.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Molecular characterization of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) may provide a biologic rationale for treatment response and novel therapeutic strategies. OBJECTIVE: To identify genetic alterations with potential clinical implications in NMIBC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Pretreatment index tumors and matched germline DNA from 105 patients with NMIBC on a prospective Institutional Review Board-approved protocol underwent targeted exon sequencing analysis in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified clinical laboratory. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Comutation patterns and copy number alterations were compared across stage and grade. Associations between genomic alterations and recurrence after intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: TERT promoter mutations (73%) and chromatin-modifying gene alterations (69%) were highly prevalent across grade and stage, suggesting these events occur early in tumorigenesis. ERBB2 or FGFR3 alterations were present in 57% of high-grade NMIBC tumors in a mutually exclusive pattern. DNA damage repair (DDR) gene alterations were seen in 30% (25/82) of high-grade NMIBC tumors, a rate similar to MIBC, and were associated with a higher mutational burden compared with tumors with intact DDR genes (p<0.001). ARID1A mutations were associated with an increased risk of recurrence after BCG (hazard ratio=3.14, 95% confidence interval: 1.51-6.51, p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Next-generation sequencing of treatment-naive index NMIBC tumors demonstrated that the majority of NMIBC tumors had at least one potentially actionable alteration that could serve as a target in rationally designed trials of intravesical or systemic therapy. DDR gene alterations were frequent in high-grade NMIBC and were associated with increased mutational load, which may have therapeutic implications for BCG immunotherapy and ongoing trials of systemic checkpoint inhibitors. ARID1A mutations were associated with an increased risk of recurrence after BCG therapy. Whether ARID1A mutations represent a predictive biomarker of BCG response or are prognostic in NMIBC patients warrants further investigation. PATIENT SUMMARY: Analysis of frequently mutated genes in superficial bladder cancer suggests potential targets for personalized treatment and predictors of treatment response, and also may help develop noninvasive tumor detection tests.
BACKGROUND: Molecular characterization of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) may provide a biologic rationale for treatment response and novel therapeutic strategies. OBJECTIVE: To identify genetic alterations with potential clinical implications in NMIBC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Pretreatment index tumors and matched germline DNA from 105 patients with NMIBC on a prospective Institutional Review Board-approved protocol underwent targeted exon sequencing analysis in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified clinical laboratory. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Comutation patterns and copy number alterations were compared across stage and grade. Associations between genomic alterations and recurrence after intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: TERT promoter mutations (73%) and chromatin-modifying gene alterations (69%) were highly prevalent across grade and stage, suggesting these events occur early in tumorigenesis. ERBB2 or FGFR3 alterations were present in 57% of high-grade NMIBC tumors in a mutually exclusive pattern. DNA damage repair (DDR) gene alterations were seen in 30% (25/82) of high-grade NMIBC tumors, a rate similar to MIBC, and were associated with a higher mutational burden compared with tumors with intact DDR genes (p<0.001). ARID1A mutations were associated with an increased risk of recurrence after BCG (hazard ratio=3.14, 95% confidence interval: 1.51-6.51, p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Next-generation sequencing of treatment-naive index NMIBC tumors demonstrated that the majority of NMIBC tumors had at least one potentially actionable alteration that could serve as a target in rationally designed trials of intravesical or systemic therapy. DDR gene alterations were frequent in high-grade NMIBC and were associated with increased mutational load, which may have therapeutic implications for BCG immunotherapy and ongoing trials of systemic checkpoint inhibitors. ARID1A mutations were associated with an increased risk of recurrence after BCG therapy. Whether ARID1A mutations represent a predictive biomarker of BCG response or are prognostic in NMIBC patients warrants further investigation. PATIENT SUMMARY: Analysis of frequently mutated genes in superficial bladder cancer suggests potential targets for personalized treatment and predictors of treatment response, and also may help develop noninvasive tumor detection tests.
Authors: Jonathan E Rosenberg; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Tom Powles; Michiel S van der Heijden; Arjun V Balar; Andrea Necchi; Nancy Dawson; Peter H O'Donnell; Ani Balmanoukian; Yohann Loriot; Sandy Srinivas; Margitta M Retz; Petros Grivas; Richard W Joseph; Matthew D Galsky; Mark T Fleming; Daniel P Petrylak; Jose Luis Perez-Gracia; Howard A Burris; Daniel Castellano; Christina Canil; Joaquim Bellmunt; Dean Bajorin; Dorothee Nickles; Richard Bourgon; Garrett M Frampton; Na Cui; Sanjeev Mariathasan; Oyewale Abidoye; Gregg D Fine; Robert Dreicer Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-03-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Karim Chamie; Mark S Litwin; Jeffrey C Bassett; Timothy J Daskivich; Julie Lai; Jan M Hanley; Badrinath R Konety; Christopher S Saigal Journal: Cancer Date: 2013-06-04 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Iver Nordentoft; Philippe Lamy; Karin Birkenkamp-Demtröder; Karey Shumansky; Søren Vang; Henrik Hornshøj; Malene Juul; Palle Villesen; Jakob Hedegaard; Andrew Roth; Kasper Thorsen; Søren Høyer; Michael Borre; Thomas Reinert; Niels Fristrup; Lars Dyrskjøt; Sohrab Shah; Jakob Skou Pedersen; Torben F Ørntoft Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Cristina Balbás-Martínez; Ana Sagrera; Enrique Carrillo-de-Santa-Pau; Julie Earl; Mirari Márquez; Miguel Vazquez; Eleonora Lapi; Francesc Castro-Giner; Sergi Beltran; Mònica Bayés; Alfredo Carrato; Juan C Cigudosa; Orlando Domínguez; Marta Gut; Jesús Herranz; Núria Juanpere; Manolis Kogevinas; Xavier Langa; Elena López-Knowles; José A Lorente; Josep Lloreta; David G Pisano; Laia Richart; Daniel Rico; Rocío N Salgado; Adonina Tardón; Stephen Chanock; Simon Heath; Alfonso Valencia; Ana Losada; Ivo Gut; Núria Malats; Francisco X Real Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2013-10-13 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Claire F Taylor; Fiona M Platt; Carolyn D Hurst; Helene H Thygesen; Margaret A Knowles Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2013-11-22 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Sumit Isharwal; Wenhuo Hu; Judy Sarungbam; Ying-Bei Chen; Anuradha Gopalan; Samson W Fine; Satish K Tickoo; Sahussapont J Sirintrapun; Sana Jadallah; Florence L Loo; Eugene J Pietzak; Eugene K Cha; Bernard H Bochner; Michael F Berger; Gopa Iyer; David B Solit; Victor E Reuter; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie Journal: J Pathol Date: 2019-04-22 Impact factor: 7.996
Authors: Carolyn D Hurst; Olivia Alder; Fiona M Platt; Alastair Droop; Lucy F Stead; Julie E Burns; George J Burghel; Sunjay Jain; Leszek J Klimczak; Helen Lindsay; Jo-An Roulson; Claire F Taylor; Helene Thygesen; Angus J Cameron; Anne J Ridley; Helen R Mott; Dmitry A Gordenin; Margaret A Knowles Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Aadel A Chaudhuri; Bruna Pellini; Nadja Pejovic; Pradeep S Chauhan; Peter K Harris; Jeffrey J Szymanski; Zachary L Smith; Vivek K Arora Journal: JCO Precis Oncol Date: 2020-07-15
Authors: Sumati Gupta; Daniel J Albertson; Timothy J Parnell; Andrew Butterfield; Alexis Weston; Lisa M Pappas; Brian Dalley; John M O'Shea; William T Lowrance; Bradley R Cairns; Joshua D Schiffman; Sunil Sharma Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2018-10-09 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Suk Hyung Lee; Wenhuo Hu; Justin T Matulay; Mark V Silva; Tomasz B Owczarek; Kwanghee Kim; Chee Wai Chua; LaMont J Barlow; Cyriac Kandoth; Alanna B Williams; Sarah K Bergren; Eugene J Pietzak; Christopher B Anderson; Mitchell C Benson; Jonathan A Coleman; Barry S Taylor; Cory Abate-Shen; James M McKiernan; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; David B Solit; Michael M Shen Journal: Cell Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 41.582