Literature DB >> 28457661

Prognostic Performance and Reproducibility of the 1973 and 2004/2016 World Health Organization Grading Classification Systems in Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A European Association of Urology Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel Systematic Review.

Viktor Soukup1, Otakar Čapoun2, Daniel Cohen3, Virginia Hernández4, Marek Babjuk5, Max Burger6, Eva Compérat7, Paolo Gontero8, Thomas Lam9, Steven MacLennan10, A Hugh Mostafid11, Joan Palou12, Bas W G van Rhijn13, Morgan Rouprêt14, Shahrokh F Shariat15, Richard Sylvester16, Yuhong Yuan17, Richard Zigeuner18.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Tumour grade is an important prognostic indicator in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Histopathological classifications are limited by interobserver variability (reproducibility), which may have prognostic implications. European Association of Urology NMIBC guidelines suggest concurrent use of both 1973 and 2004/2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classifications.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the prognostic performance and reproducibility of the 1973 and 2004/2016 WHO grading systems for NMIBC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic literature search was undertaken incorporating Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies were critically appraised for risk of bias (QUIPS). For prognosis, the primary outcome was progression to muscle-invasive or metastatic disease. Secondary outcomes were disease recurrence, and overall and cancer-specific survival. For reproducibility, the primary outcome was interobserver variability between pathologists. Secondary outcome was intraobserver variability (repeatability) by the same pathologist. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Of 3593 articles identified, 20 were included in the prognostic review; three were eligible for the reproducibility review. Increasing tumour grade in both classifications was associated with higher disease progression and recurrence rates. Progression rates in grade 1 patients were similar to those in low-grade patients; progression rates in grade 3 patients were higher than those in high-grade patients. Survival data were limited. Reproducibility of the 2004/2016 system was marginally better than that of the 1973 system. Two studies on repeatability showed conflicting results. Most studies had a moderate to high risk of bias.
CONCLUSIONS: Current grading classifications in NMIBC are suboptimal. The 1973 system identifies more aggressive tumours. Intra- and interobserver variability was slightly less in the 2004/2016 classification. We could not confirm that the 2004/2016 classification outperforms the 1973 classification in prediction of recurrence and progression. PATIENT
SUMMARY: This article summarises the utility of two different grading systems for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Both systems predict progression and recurrence, although pathologists vary in their reporting; suggestions for further improvements are made.
Copyright © 2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1973 World Health Organization classification; 2004/2016 World Health Organization classification; Grade; Non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer; Prognosis; Progression; Recurrence; Repeatability; Reproducibility

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28457661     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  54 in total

1.  SIU-ICUD on bladder cancer: pathology.

Authors:  Eva Compérat; Marek Babjuk; Ferran Algaba; Mahul Amin; Fadi Brimo; David Grignon; Donna Hansel; Ondra Hes; Bernard Malavaud; Victor Reuter; Theo van der Kwast
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Multiparametric MRI of the bladder: inter-observer agreement and accuracy with the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) at a single reference center.

Authors:  Giovanni Barchetti; Giuseppe Simone; Isabella Ceravolo; Vincenzo Salvo; Riccardo Campa; Francesco Del Giudice; Ettore De Berardinis; Dorelsa Buccilli; Carlo Catalano; Michele Gallucci; James W F Catto; Valeria Panebianco
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Adjuvant therapies for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: advances during BCG shortage.

Authors:  Adithya Balasubramanian; Ashray Gunjur; Andrew Weickhardt; Nathan Papa; Damien Bolton; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Marlon Perera
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  The application value of multi-parameter cystoscope in improving the accuracy of preoperative bladder cancer grading.

Authors:  Qikai Wu; Lingkai Cai; Baorui Yuan; Qiang Cao; Juntao Zhuang; Meiling Bao; Zhen Wang; Dexiang Feng; Jun Tao; Pengchao Li; Qiang Shao; Xiao Yang; Qiang Lu
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.090

5.  Effects of transurethral resection under general anesthesia on tumor recurrence in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Yuto Baba; Eiji Kikuchi; Keisuke Shigeta; Koichiro Ogihara; Masashi Matsushima; Yui Nishimoto; Yasuaki Murata; Hirotaka Asakura; Masafumi Oyama; Ryuichi Mizuno; Mototsugu Oya
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Prognostic value and reproducibility of different microscopic characteristics in the WHO grading systems for pTa and pT1 urinary bladder urothelial carcinomas.

Authors:  Vebjørn Kvikstad; Ok Målfrid Mangrud; Einar Gudlaugsson; Ingvild Dalen; Hans Espeland; Jan P A Baak; Emiel A M Janssen
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 2.644

7.  Antitumor Activity of Auger Electron Emitter 111In Delivered by Modular Nanotransporter for Treatment of Bladder Cancer With EGFR Overexpression.

Authors:  Andrey A Rosenkranz; Tatiana A Slastnikova; Tatiana A Karmakova; Maria S Vorontsova; Natalia B Morozova; Vasiliy M Petriev; Alexey S Abrosimov; Yuri V Khramtsov; Tatiana N Lupanova; Alexey V Ulasov; Raisa I Yakubovskaya; Georgii P Georgiev; Alexander S Sobolev
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 8.  Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Bladder Cancer: Development of VI-RADS (Vesical Imaging-Reporting And Data System).

Authors:  Valeria Panebianco; Yoshifumi Narumi; Ersan Altun; Bernard H Bochner; Jason A Efstathiou; Shaista Hafeez; Robert Huddart; Steve Kennish; Seth Lerner; Rodolfo Montironi; Valdair F Muglia; Georg Salomon; Stephen Thomas; Hebert Alberto Vargas; J Alfred Witjes; Mitsuru Takeuchi; Jelle Barentsz; James W F Catto
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 9.  Evolution of Urothelial Bladder Cancer in the Context of Molecular Classifications.

Authors:  Martina Minoli; Mirjam Kiener; George N Thalmann; Marianna Kruithof-de Julio; Roland Seiler
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Is there a role for second transurethral resection in pTa high-grade urothelial bladder cancer?

Authors:  Anuj Deep Dangi; Ramani Manoj Kumar; Thomas Alex Kodiatte; Mahasampth Gowri; Santosh Kumar; Antony Devasia; Nitin Kekre
Journal:  Cent European J Urol       Date:  2018-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.