Literature DB >> 10664630

Grading and staging of bladder carcinoma in transurethral resection specimens. Correlation with 105 matched cystectomy specimens.

L Cheng1, R M Neumann, A L Weaver, J C Cheville, B C Leibovich, D M Ramnani, B G Scherer, A Nehra, H Zincke, D G Bostwick.   

Abstract

We compared the grading and staging of transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) and cystectomy specimens for 105 patients who underwent radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma between 1980 and 1984. Of 105 patients, 96% underwent cystectomy within 100 days of TURB (median interval, 10 days). Grading was performed according to the 1998 World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathology grading system and staging according to the 1997 TNM classification. Histologic grade was low-grade, 13; high-grade, 92 in TURB specimens; low-grade, 17; high-grade, 88 in cystectomy specimens. Pathologic stage was Ta, 15; T1, 55; and T2, 35 in TURB specimens; Ta, 5; T1, 19; T2, 19; T3, 46; and T4, 16 in cystectomy specimens. Histologic grade at TURB was associated with pathologic stage at cystectomy (P < .001). When all advanced-stage (muscle-invasive) carcinomas (pT2 or more) were considered together, 55 patients were understaged by TURB, 4 had higher stage in TURB than in cystectomy, and 46 were the same stage as by cystectomy. Forty-three of 55 patients with stage T1 carcinoma at TURB had advanced-stage carcinoma at cystectomy, including 34 who had extravesicular extension (pT3 or more). We found pathologic understanding by TURB occurs in a significant number of patients with bladder cancer; the newly proposed grading system predicted final pathologic stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10664630     DOI: 10.1309/94B6-8VFB-MN9J-1NF5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  22 in total

Review 1.  Emerging endoscopic imaging technologies for bladder cancer detection.

Authors:  Aristeo Lopez; Joseph C Liao
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Accuracy of grading of urothelial carcinoma on urine cytology: an analysis of interobserver and intraobserver agreement.

Authors:  Michelle D Reid; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Momin T Siddiqui; Stephen W Looney
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2012-10-20

3.  Multimodal 3D cancer-mimicking optical phantom.

Authors:  Gennifer T Smith; Kristen L Lurie; Dimitar V Zlatev; Joseph C Liao; Audrey K Ellerbee Bowden
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  A 20-gene model for molecular nodal staging of bladder cancer: development and prospective assessment.

Authors:  Steven Christopher Smith; Alexander Spyridon Baras; Garrett Dancik; Yuanbin Ru; Kuan-Fu Ding; Christopher A Moskaluk; Yves Fradet; Jan Lehmann; Michael Stöckle; Arndt Hartmann; Jae K Lee; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  [Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: evaluation by combined endoscopy and urine cytology: is incontrovertible assessment possible?].

Authors:  J Hess; S Tschirdewahn; T Szarvas; R Rossi; H Rübben; F Vom Dorp
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  Role of Narrow Band Imaging in Management of Urothelial Carcinoma.

Authors:  Emanuela Altobelli; Dimitar V Zlatev; Joseph C Liao
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Impact of concomitant carcinoma in situ on upstaging and outcome following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Faysal A Yafi; Armen G Aprikian; Joseph L Chin; Yves Fradet; Jonathan Izawa; Eric Estey; Adrian Fairey; Ricardo Rendon; Ilias Cagiannos; Louis Lacombe; Jean-Baptiste Lattouf; Fred Saad; David Bell; Darrel Drachenberg; Wassim Kassouf
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 8.  Use of nomograms as predictive tools in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Ahmad Shabsigh; Bernard H Bochner
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  [Quality of care in patients with newly diagnosed bladder cancer: a prospective assessment in northern Germany].

Authors:  C Reek; M Rink; M Bloch; J Hansen; F K Chun; A Schneider; J Busche; M Fisch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Reproducibility of the 1998 World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathology classification of papillary urothelial neoplasms of the urinary bladder.

Authors:  Kutsal Yorukoglu; Burcin Tuna; Emel Dikicioglu; Ender Duzcan; Aydin Isisag; Sait Sen; Ugur Mungan; Ziya Kirkali
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2003-10-08       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.