| Literature DB >> 35840976 |
Sara Trifunovic1, Katarina Smiljanić2, Albert Sickmann3,4,5, Fiorella A Solari3, Stoimir Kolarevic6, Aleksandra Divac Rankov7, Mila Ljujic7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although still considered a safer alternative to classical cigarettes, growing body of work points to harmful effects of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) affecting a range of cellular processes. The biological effect of e-cigarettes needs to be investigated in more detail considering their widespread use.Entities:
Keywords: Electronic cigarettes; Lung fibroblast; Metabolic cooperation; Proteomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35840976 PMCID: PMC9285873 DOI: 10.1186/s12931-022-02102-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respir Res ISSN: 1465-9921
Fig. 1Mutagenicity and genotoxicity of e-cigarette liquids in V79 cells. A Colony forming ability of V79 cells after 72 h (ECL; ECL-N; NIC) and 1 h (H2O2), treatments normalised to control (ctrl). B Number of HPRT(-) cells per 1 × 106 seeded V79 cells after 6 days of recovery from treatments. C Number of HPRT(-) cells per 1 × 106 cells normalised to colony forming ability after treatments. A–C Data are presented as mean ± SEM from six independent replicates. D The level of DNA damage in V79 cells determined by single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet assay)—tail DNA (%) of V79 cells after 72 h (ECL; ECL-N; NIC) and 1 h (H2O2) treatments. Data are representative of three independent experiments. E Representative images of tail DNA (comets) of treated V79 cells
Fig. 2Effects of e-cigarette liquids on metabolic cooperation and Cx43 protein expression. A Metabolic cooperation: number of 6-TG-R V79 surviving colonies in mixed co-cultures of 100 6-TG-R and 0.75 × 106 WT cells normalised to seeding controls (100 6-TG-R cells treated the same way as co-cultures). B Densitometric quantification of Cx43 protein expression normalised to tubulin. Data are presented as mean ± SEM from three separate experiments of independent cell preparations. * p < 0.05; **p < 0.01 versus negative control. C Western blot of Cx43 and tubulin as endogenous control in V79 cells after 72 h treatments, blot is representative of three separate experiments and cropped from original image (Additional file 7: Fig. S7)
Fig. 3Proteomes overlap of V79 cell treatments and their bioinformatics profiling in respect to biological processes. A Venn diagram of V79 treatments top proteins (e.g. in case when several proteoforms with different accession entries are present, only the top scored are reported); the numbers in the brackets denote total top proteins in each treatment. B Cellular component comparisons among V79 treatments with statistically significant enrichment of gene products in representative examples of cell compartments; p values displayed were calculated by hypergeometric test. C Biological processes profiling and its enrichment analysis in V79 lung fibroblast treatments. Legend: -log10 (p-value), the probability score in the gene ontology enrichment analysis; tca, tricarboxylic acid cycle; ipr, intracellular protein transport; fct, formation of cytoplasm translation initiation complex. All graphics were done in FunRich 3.1.3 software
Fig. 4Relative proteomic quantification of differently regulated proteins in V79 cell treatments and their bioinformatics comparison. A Heat map of relative, label-free protein quantification (LFQ) of V79 cell line treatments displaying the protein groups that passed the filters (only significantly up- and downregulated proteins in respect to control, at p < 0.01 done with PEAKS Q statistical test). The hierarchical clustering was generated using neighbour-joining algorithm with a Euclidean distance similarity measurement of the log2 ratios of the protein abundance of each group relative to the average abundance. B Gene ontologies with significant enrichment (p < 0.05, according to a hypergeometric and Bonferroni tests) in control-upregulated (red bars) and control-downregulated (green bars) proteins, in respect to molecular function, cellular component and biological processes aspects done in FunRich 3.1.3 program
Relative modification profiling of carbonylation, oxidative and e-cigarettes biohazard chemical modifications among control and treated V79 cell proteomes
| Modification type | Control | ECL | ECL-N | NIC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ratio* | %** | Ratio | % | Ratio | % | Ratio | % | |
| 2-pyrrolidone from Pro | 1 | 0.03 | 1.8 | 0.07 | 1.4 | 0.07 | 1 | 0.04 |
| 2-amino-3-oxo-butanoic_acid from Thr | 1 | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.001 | 0.02 | 0.004 | 0.01 | 0.002 |
| Lysine oxidation to aminoadipic semialdehyde | N/A | 0 | ∞ | 0.001 | N/A | 0 | N/A | 0 |
| Levuglandinyl-lysine anhyropyrrole adduct | 1 | 0.01 | 2.5 | 0.05 | 4 | 0.11 | 0.7 | 0.02 |
| 4-hydroxynonenal (HNE) | N/A | 0 | ∞ | 0.001 | ∞ | 0.003 | N/A | 0 |
| Carboxymethyl on N term | N/A | 0 | ∞ | 0.004 | ∞ | 0.002 | N/A | 0 |
| Met single oxidation (sulfoxide) | 1 | 54 | 0.8 | 66 | 0.7 | 78 | 0.8 | 68 |
| Met double oxidation (sulfone) | 1 | 0.02 | 5.9 | 0.2 | 4.6 | 0.2 | 1.9 | 0.06 |
| His and Trp oxidation | 1 | 0.09 | 5.9 | 0.77 | 4.8 | 0.85 | 3.7 | 0.51 |
| Proline oxidation to pyroglutamic acid | N/A | 0 | N/A | 0 | ∞ | 0.003 | N/A | 0 |
| Tryptophan oxidation to hydroxykynurenin | 1 | 0.01 | 1.2 | 0.02 | 0.9 | 0.02 | 1.4 | 0.02 |
| 2.3-dihydro-2 2-dimethyl-7-benzofuranol N-methyl carbamate | N/A | 0 | N/A | 0 | ∞ | 0.001 | N/A | 0 |
| 5-dimethylaminonaphthalene-1-sulfonyl | N/A | 0 | ∞ | 0.004 | ∞ | 0.001 | ∞ | 0.002 |
| Hydroxymethyl | N/A | 0 | ∞ | 0.0003 | N/A | 0 | N/A | 0 |
| O-Isopropylmethylphosphonylation | N/A | 0 | ∞ | 0.003 | N/A | 0 | N/A | 0 |
| Tri nitro benzene | N/A | 0 | ∞ | 0.1 | ∞ | 0.1 | N/A | 0 |
| Diethylation | N/A | 0 | ∞ | 0.002 | N/A | 0 | N/A | 0 |
| Acetaldehyde + 26 | 1 | 0.01 | 1.8 | 0.03 | 1.5 | 0.04 | 1.4 | 0.03 |
| Dichlorination of tyrosine residues | 1 | 0.0004 | 45 | 0.03 | 32 | 0.03 | 27 | 0.02 |
| Ethylation | 1 | 0.01 | 2.7 | 0.05 | 1.4 | 0.04 | 3.4 | 0.07 |
| Replacement of 2 protons by nickel | 1 | 0.08 | 1.3 | 0.16 | 1.1 | 0.18 | 1.1 | 0.14 |
*Ratio: sum of areas under extracted ion chromatography (XIC) curves of all modified peptides bearing the same modification type divided by the sum of XIC curve areas of modified peptides from the control group. ** Percentage (%): share of the sum of XIC curve areas of all modified peptides with certain modification type, within summed XIC areas of all proteins per treatment (e.g. share within the complete proteome of the particular treatment). N/A: not applicable since modified peptide form does not exist (e.g. only unmodified form of peptide is present). ∞: when dividing integer with 0 as in the case when expressing ratio where XIC value of control modified peptide is 0