Literature DB >> 31163219

Genotoxicity evaluation of tobacco and nicotine delivery products: Part Two. In vitro micronucleus assay.

David Thorne1, Robert Leverette2, Damien Breheny3, Mel Lloyd4, Stephen McEnaney4, James Whitwell4, Julie Clements4, Betsy Bombick2, Marianna Gaça3.   

Abstract

In this study, a variety of test matrices from tobacco and nicotine delivery products were assessed against a 3R4F Kentucky reference cigarette using the in vitro micronucleus assay. Testing was conducted using two Chinese hamster cell lines (CHO and V79), and a human lymphoblastoid cell line (TK6), in accordance with established guidelines. Total particulate matter (TPM) from a 3R4F Reference cigarette was compared to an electronic cigarette e-liquid, electronic cigarette TPM and TPM from a commercial tobacco heating product using a standard and an extended treatment condition with recovery period. Cells were assessed with 3R4F TPM prior to assessment of the other tobacco and nicotine product test matrices. These cell lines gave varied responses to 3R4F TPM with the most robust response using V79 cells. The use of an extended exposure/recovery period was seen to increase assay sensitivity for CHO and V79 cell lines but was less clear for TK6 cells. Negative responses were observed for all products except 3R4F across all treatment conditions in V79 cells. The most potent response to cigarette smoke was following extended treatment with recovery, suggesting this may be a more appropriate treatment for the future assessment of tobacco and nicotine product test matrices.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  E-cigarette; E-liquid; IVMN; In vitro; NGP; Nicotine equivalents; THP; TPM

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31163219     DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.05.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol        ISSN: 0278-6915            Impact factor:   6.023


  7 in total

1.  Review of industry reports on EU priority tobacco additives part B: Methodological limitations.

Authors:  Anette K Bolling; Nadja Mallock; Efthimios Zervas; Stéphanie Caillé-Garnier; Thibault Mansuy; Cécile Michel; Jeroen L A Pennings; Thomas Schulz; Per E Schwarze; Renata Solimini; Jean-Pol Tassin; Constantine Vardavas; Miguel Merino; Charlotte G G M Pauwels; Lotte E van Nierop; Claude Lambré; Anne Havermans
Journal:  Tob Prev Cessat       Date:  2022-07-05

2.  Electronic cigarette liquids impair metabolic cooperation and alter proteomic profiles in V79 cells.

Authors:  Sara Trifunovic; Katarina Smiljanić; Albert Sickmann; Fiorella A Solari; Stoimir Kolarevic; Aleksandra Divac Rankov; Mila Ljujic
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2022-07-15

3.  The in vitro ToxTracker and Aneugen Clastogen Evaluation extension assay as a tool in the assessment of relative genotoxic potential of e-liquids and their aerosols.

Authors:  Lukasz Czekala; Fiona Chapman; Liam Simms; Kathryn Rudd; Edgar Trelles Sticken; Roman Wieczorek; Lisa Maria Bode; Jutta Pani; Nynke Moelijker; Remco Derr; Inger Brandsma; Giel Hendriks; Matthew Stevenson; Tanvir Walele
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 4.  Heated Tobacco Products: A Review of Current Knowledge and Initial Assessments.

Authors:  Nadja Mallock; Elke Pieper; Christoph Hutzler; Frank Henkler-Stephani; Andreas Luch
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2019-10-10

5.  Free Radical Production in the Smoking of E-Cigarettes and their Possible Effects in Human Health.

Authors:  Roberto Menicagli; Ortensio Marotta; Roberta Serra
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2020-04-30

6.  Impact of cigarette versus electronic cigarette aerosol conditioned media on aortic endothelial cells in a microfluidic cardiovascular model.

Authors:  Om Makwana; Gina A Smith; Hannah E Flockton; Gary P Watters; Frazer Lowe; Damien Breheny
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Collecting e-cigarette aerosols for in vitro applications: A survey of the biomedical literature and opportunities to increase the value of submerged cell culture-based assessments.

Authors:  Daniel J Smart; Gary Phillips
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2020-10-04       Impact factor: 3.446

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.