Literature DB >> 27169655

Determination of Chemical Compounds Generated from Second-generation E-cigarettes Using a Sorbent Cartridge Followed by a Two-step Elution Method.

Shigehisa Uchiyama1, Yui Senoo, Hideki Hayashida, Yohei Inaba, Hideki Nakagome, Naoki Kunugita.   

Abstract

We developed an analytical method for analyzing electronic cigarette (E-cigarette) smoke, and measured the carbonyl compounds and volatile organic compounds generated by 10 brands of second-generation E-cigarettes. A glass filter (Cambridge filter pad) for particulate matter and a solid sorbent tube packed with Carboxen-572 for gaseous compounds were used to collect E-cigarette smoke. These were then analyzed using a two-step elution method with carbon disulfide and methanol, followed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC/MS). Formaldehyde (FA), acetaldehyde (AA), acetone (AC), acrolein (ACR), propanal (PA), acetol (AT), glyoxal (GO), and methyl glyoxal (MGO) were detected by HPLC in some E-cigarettes. Propylene glycol (PG), glycerol (GLY), and some esters were detected by GC/MS. GO and MGO exist mainly as particulate matter. AA, AC, ACR, PA, and AT exist mainly as gaseous compounds. FA exists as both particulate matter and gaseous compounds. These carbonyl compounds have carbon numbers C1 - C3. The main components of E-liquid are PG (C3) and GLY (C3). Therefore, the oxidation of liquids, such as PG and GLY in E-cigarettes upon incidental contact with the heating element in E-cigarette, is suggested as being a possible cause for carbonyl generation. When the puff number exceeds a critical point, carbonyl generation rapidly increases and then remains constant. The results of this study are now being used to determine the following E-cigarette smoking protocol: puff volume, 55 mL; puff duration, 2 s; and puff number, 30. E-cigarette analysis revealed very large variation in carbonyl concentration among not only different brands, but also different samples of the same product. Typical distributions of carbonyl concentration were not observed in any of the E-cigarettes tested, and the mean values greatly differed from median values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27169655     DOI: 10.2116/analsci.32.549

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Sci        ISSN: 0910-6340            Impact factor:   2.081


  28 in total

1.  Japan Atherosclerosis Society (JAS) Guidelines for Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Diseases 2017.

Authors:  Makoto Kinoshita; Koutaro Yokote; Hidenori Arai; Mami Iida; Yasushi Ishigaki; Shun Ishibashi; Seiji Umemoto; Genshi Egusa; Hirotoshi Ohmura; Tomonori Okamura; Shinji Kihara; Shinji Koba; Isao Saito; Tetsuo Shoji; Hiroyuki Daida; Kazuhisa Tsukamoto; Juno Deguchi; Seitaro Dohi; Kazushige Dobashi; Hirotoshi Hamaguchi; Masumi Hara; Takafumi Hiro; Sadatoshi Biro; Yoshio Fujioka; Chizuko Maruyama; Yoshihiro Miyamoto; Yoshitaka Murakami; Masayuki Yokode; Hiroshi Yoshida; Hiromi Rakugi; Akihiko Wakatsuki; Shizuya Yamashita
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 4.928

2.  Indoor Air Quality and Passive E-cigarette Aerosol Exposures in Vape-Shops.

Authors:  Yeongkwon Son; Daniel P Giovenco; Cristine Delnevo; Andrey Khlystov; Vera Samburova; Qingyu Meng
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Nicotine and Carbonyl Emissions From Popular Electronic Cigarette Products: Correlation to Liquid Composition and Design Characteristics.

Authors:  Ahmad El-Hellani; Rola Salman; Rachel El-Hage; Soha Talih; Nathalie Malek; Rima Baalbaki; Nareg Karaoghlanian; Rima Nakkash; Alan Shihadeh; Najat A Saliba
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 4.244

Review 4.  Electronic cigarettes: One size does not fit all.

Authors:  Amika K Sood; Matthew J Kesic; Michelle L Hernandez
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 10.793

5.  Comparing the cytotoxicity of electronic cigarette fluids, aerosols and solvents.

Authors:  Rachel Z Behar; Yuhuan Wang; Prue Talbot
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  Investigating E-Cigarette Particle Emissions and Human Airway Depositions under Various E-Cigarette-Use Conditions.

Authors:  Yeongkwon Son; Gediminas Mainelis; Cristine Delnevo; Olivia A Wackowski; Stephan Schwander; Qingyu Meng
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.739

7.  Headspace analysis for screening of volatile organic compound profiles of electronic juice bulk material.

Authors:  Ryan F LeBouf; Dru A Burns; Anand Ranpara; Kathleen Attfield; Leonard Zwack; Aleksandr B Stefaniak
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 8.  A Review of Pulmonary Toxicity of Electronic Cigarettes in the Context of Smoking: A Focus on Inflammation.

Authors:  Peter G Shields; Micah Berman; Theodore M Brasky; Jo L Freudenheim; Ewy Mathe; Joseph P McElroy; Min-Ae Song; Mark D Wewers
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Evaluation of E-Vapor Nicotine and Nicotyrine Concentrations under Various E-Liquid Compositions, Device Settings, and Vaping Topographies.

Authors:  Yeongkwon Son; Olivia Wackowski; Clifford Weisel; Stephan Schwander; Gediminas Mainelis; Cristine Delnevo; Qingyu Meng
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.739

10.  Electronic Cigarette Refill Fluids Sold Worldwide: Flavor Chemical Composition, Toxicity, and Hazard Analysis.

Authors:  Esther E Omaiye; Wentai Luo; Kevin J McWhirter; James F Pankow; Prue Talbot
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.