Literature DB >> 3583639

The relationship between tonic accommodation and refractive error.

N A McBrien, M Millodot.   

Abstract

It is now well established that accommodation adopts an intermediate resting position in the absence of visual stimulation. It also has been shown that this tonic position of accommodation exhibits considerable variation among individuals (ie, 0-4 D). Previous studies have been somewhat inconclusive as to whether these individual differences in tonic accommodation are related to the refractive properties of the eye. This study investigates the relationship between tonic accommodation and refractive error with particular reference to both the value and the time course of tonic accommodation. Sixty-two subjects were used for the study, with an age range of 19-25 yr. Subjects were placed into one of four refractive groups, after considering factors pertaining to the theories of refractive development. Darkroom measures of tonic accommodation were determined using the infrared objective autorefractor, Canon Autoref R-1. Significant differences were found among the four refractive groups, with corrected hyperopes having the highest dioptric value of tonic accommodation and corrected late-onset myopes having the lowest dioptric value. The significant difference found between early- and late-onset myopes is suggested as a possible reason for the inconclusive results of some previous studies. It also was found that the time taken to reach a stable tonic position of accommodation was much slower for the hyperopic group than for the other refractive groups. The results are discussed in the light of recent findings on accommodative hysteresis and with respect to a dual innervation to the ciliary muscle.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3583639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  16 in total

1.  Steady-state accommodation and ocular biometry in late-onset myopia.

Authors:  M A Bullimore; B Gilmartin; J M Royston
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Mesopic contrast sensitivity in the presence or absence of glare in a large driver population.

Authors:  María C Puell; Catalina Palomo; Celia Sánchez-Ramos; Consuelo Villena
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Characteristics of accommodative behavior during sustained reading in emmetropes and myopes.

Authors:  Elise Harb; Frank Thorn; David Troilo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Accuracy of a new photo-refractometer in young and adult patients.

Authors:  Thilo Schimitzek; Wolf A Lagrèze
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-01-14       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  Clinical and laboratory investigations of the relationship of accommodation and convergence function with refractive error. A literature review.

Authors:  D A Goss; H Zhai
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Accommodation response and spherical aberration during orthokeratology.

Authors:  L Batres; S Peruzzo; M Serramito; G Carracedo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 7.  A Review of Intraocular Pressure (IOP) and Axial Myopia.

Authors:  Dongyan Zhang; Liyin Wang; Le Jin; Yingying Wen; Xuhong Zhang; Liyue Zhang; Hong Zhu; Ziyu Wang; Xin Yu; Chen Xie; Jianping Tong; Ye Shen
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 1.974

8.  Tonic accommodation predicts closed-loop accommodation responses.

Authors:  Chunming Liu; Stefanie A Drew; Eric Borsting; Amy Escobar; Lawrence Stark; Christopher Chase
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Inter-individual variability in the dynamics of natural accommodation in humans: relation to age and refractive errors.

Authors:  F Schaeffel; H Wilhelm; E Zrenner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  The influence of first near-spectacle reading correction on accommodation and its interaction with convergence.

Authors:  Indu Vedamurthy; Wendy W Harrison; Yue Liu; Ian Cox; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.