Thilo Schimitzek1, Wolf A Lagrèze. 1. Sektion Neuroophthalmologie, Kinderophthalmologie, Schielbehandlung Universitäts-Augenklinik, Killianstr. 5, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. Schimi@aug.ukl.uni-freiburg.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Photorefraction can be carried out in both eyes simultaneously from a distance and is therefore suitable for examination of children. This study evaluated the accuracy of a commercially available photo-refractometer (Power Refractor, Plusoptix, Erlangen, Germany) and investigated whether the working distance relaxes the accommodation sufficiently without cycloplegia. METHODS: Photo-refractometer readings were compared to cycloplegic retinoscopy. Because of the limited working range the group of patients consisted of low and moderate ametropic eyes within a spherical power of -7.0 to +5.0 D. One hundred and ninety-two eyes from 104 patients (2-81 years) were photo-refracted under cycloplegia. A subgroup of 83 eyes from 46 patients was additionally refracted without cycloplegia. RESULTS: Under cycloplegia, the Power Refractor measured the spherical equivalent slightly below that of cycloplegic retinoscopy (too much minus). The mean difference in spherical equivalent was -0.12+/-0.91 D (SD). The mean difference of cylindrical power was -0.17+/-0.73 D. The mean weighted axis difference was 0.61+/-0.71 D which is comparable to an axis deviation of 18 degrees at a cylinder power of 1.00 D. Without cycloplegia, the mean difference of the spherical equivalent was -0.73+/-1.25 D. The mean difference of cylindrical power was -0.20+/-0.65 D. The mean weighted axis difference was 0.44+/-0.58 D which is comparable to an axis deviation of 13 degrees at a cylinder power of 1.00 D. CONCLUSIONS: Without cycloplegia, the spherical equivalent of the Power Refractor tends to be underestimated due to uncontrolled accommodation, especially in children. Cycloplegia improves the accuracy in evaluating the spherical equivalent, but decreases the accuracy of cylinder power and axis.
BACKGROUND: Photorefraction can be carried out in both eyes simultaneously from a distance and is therefore suitable for examination of children. This study evaluated the accuracy of a commercially available photo-refractometer (Power Refractor, Plusoptix, Erlangen, Germany) and investigated whether the working distance relaxes the accommodation sufficiently without cycloplegia. METHODS: Photo-refractometer readings were compared to cycloplegic retinoscopy. Because of the limited working range the group of patients consisted of low and moderate ametropic eyes within a spherical power of -7.0 to +5.0 D. One hundred and ninety-two eyes from 104 patients (2-81 years) were photo-refracted under cycloplegia. A subgroup of 83 eyes from 46 patients was additionally refracted without cycloplegia. RESULTS: Under cycloplegia, the Power Refractor measured the spherical equivalent slightly below that of cycloplegic retinoscopy (too much minus). The mean difference in spherical equivalent was -0.12+/-0.91 D (SD). The mean difference of cylindrical power was -0.17+/-0.73 D. The mean weighted axis difference was 0.61+/-0.71 D which is comparable to an axis deviation of 18 degrees at a cylinder power of 1.00 D. Without cycloplegia, the mean difference of the spherical equivalent was -0.73+/-1.25 D. The mean difference of cylindrical power was -0.20+/-0.65 D. The mean weighted axis difference was 0.44+/-0.58 D which is comparable to an axis deviation of 13 degrees at a cylinder power of 1.00 D. CONCLUSIONS: Without cycloplegia, the spherical equivalent of the Power Refractor tends to be underestimated due to uncontrolled accommodation, especially in children. Cycloplegia improves the accuracy in evaluating the spherical equivalent, but decreases the accuracy of cylinder power and axis.