Literature DB >> 31720836

Accommodation response and spherical aberration during orthokeratology.

L Batres1,2, S Peruzzo1, M Serramito1, G Carracedo3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the changes in the accommodative response and in the corneal and internal spherical aberration during 3 months of wear of orthokeratology lenses from the baseline.
METHODS: Fifty children aged 8 to 17 were recruited for a prospective study and were fitted with orthokeratology lenses. Refraction without cycloplegia, high and low uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), accommodation lag, horizontal near phoria without correction, corneal topography, corneal, and total wavefront aberration were performed at baseline, 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. Data were analyzed by Student's t test for related samples, repeated measures ANOVA test, and Pearson correlation test.
RESULTS: The spherical equivalent (SE) before and after 3 months was - 3.33 ± 1.60 D and - 0.30 ± 0.46 D, respectively. Accommodation lag was 0.53 ± 0.38 D and 0.20 ± 0.33 D at baseline and at 3 months, respectively. A moderate correlation between lag at the baseline and its change between baseline and the 3-month visit was found (P < 0.05; R = 0.748). The spherical aberration (SA) increased for anterior corneal and total measurement, being statistically significant for all visits (P < 0.05). The internal SA decreased: - 0.105 ± 0.006 at baseline and - 0.196 ± 0.203 at 1 week (P < 0.05). No difference between baseline and the follow-up visits in posterior corneal SA was found (P > 0.05)
CONCLUSION: The negative SA of the lens increases during OK treatment compensated for the increase of the anterior corneal surface positive SA, in addition to increasing the accommodative response.

Entities:  

Keywords:  : Myopia; Aberrations; Accommodation; Orthokeratology

Year:  2019        PMID: 31720836     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-019-04504-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  90 in total

1.  The effect of refractive error on the accommodative response gradient: a summary and update.

Authors:  Michel Millodot
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Peripheral refraction in orthokeratology patients.

Authors:  W Neil Charman; John Mountford; David A Atchison; Emma L Markwell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  A Comparison of the Effects of Orthokeratology Lens, Medcall Lens, and Ordinary Frame Glasses on the Accommodative Response in Myopic Children.

Authors:  Xiaoxia Han; Dongjun Xu; Weizhong Ge; Zhi Wang; Xiaodong Li; Weihua Liu
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.018

4.  Spectacle lenses alter eye growth and the refractive status of young monkeys.

Authors:  L F Hung; M L Crawford; E L Smith
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 5.  IMI - Interventions Myopia Institute: Interventions for Controlling Myopia Onset and Progression Report.

Authors:  Christine F Wildsoet; Audrey Chia; Pauline Cho; Jeremy A Guggenheim; Jan Roelof Polling; Scott Read; Padmaja Sankaridurg; Seang-Mei Saw; Klaus Trier; Jeffrey J Walline; Pei-Chang Wu; James S Wolffsohn
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Relative peripheral refractive error and the risk of onset and progression of myopia in children.

Authors:  Donald O Mutti; Loraine T Sinnott; G Lynn Mitchell; Lisa A Jones-Jordan; Melvin L Moeschberger; Susan A Cotter; Robert N Kleinstein; Ruth E Manny; J Daniel Twelker; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 7.  Myopia and associated pathological complications.

Authors:  Seang-Mei Saw; Gus Gazzard; Edwin Chan Shih-Yen; Wei-Han Chua
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Accommodation function comparison following use of contact lens for orthokeratology and spectacle use in myopic children: a prospective controlled trial.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Li Wang; Peng Li; Jun Li
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 9.  IMI - Myopia Genetics Report.

Authors:  Milly S Tedja; Annechien E G Haarman; Magda A Meester-Smoor; Jaakko Kaprio; David A Mackey; Jeremy A Guggenheim; Christopher J Hammond; Virginie J M Verhoeven; Caroline C W Klaver
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Interaction between Corneal and Internal Ocular Aberrations Induced by Orthokeratology and Its Influential Factors.

Authors:  Qingzhong Chen; Min Li; Ying Yuan; Rao Me; Yunjie Yu; Guangsen Shi; Bilian Ke
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-08-06       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  1 in total

1.  The associations of accommodation and aberrations in myopia control with orthokeratology.

Authors:  Chenglu Ding; Yunyun Chen; Xue Li; Yingying Huang; Hao Chen; Jinhua Bao
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2021-12-05       Impact factor: 3.992

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.