Literature DB >> 1425129

Steady-state accommodation and ocular biometry in late-onset myopia.

M A Bullimore1, B Gilmartin, J M Royston.   

Abstract

The steady-state accommodative responses of emmetropes and late-onset myopes was measured for an array of numbers located at -1, -3 and -5 dioptres using an objective infra-red optometer. Responses were compared for passive (reading numbers) and active (adding numbers) conditions. For the passive condition, the late-onset myopes showed a significantly lower accommodative response than the emmetropic group. No significant differences were found between the two groups for the active condition. Ocular biometric characteristics were also measured in emmetropes, late-onset myopes and early-onset myopes using keratometry and ultrasonography. No significant differences in corneal curvature, anterior chamber depth and crystalline lens thickness were found between the groups. Late-onset myopes exhibited significantly deeper vitreous chambers than emmetropes, which more than accounted for the difference in refractive error between the two refractive groups. We conclude that, while significant differences exist in the accommodative responses of late-onset myopes and emmetropes, late-onset myopia is due predominantly to elongation of the vitreous chamber.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1425129     DOI: 10.1007/bf00161240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  37 in total

1.  Effects of luminance and stimulus distance on accommodation and visual resolution.

Authors:  C A Johnson
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1976-02

2.  The fixation point as a stimulus for accommodation.

Authors:  D A Owens; H W Leibowitz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  On emmetropia and ametropia.

Authors:  G van ALPHEN
Journal:  Opt Acta (Lond)       Date:  1961

4.  The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence.

Authors:  E F FINCHAM; J WALTON
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1957-08-06       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Modification of the Canon Auto Ref R1 for use as a continuously recording infra-red optometer.

Authors:  J R Pugh; B Winn
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Static accommodation and the minimum angle of resolution.

Authors:  W N Charman
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1986-11

7.  The relationship between tonic accommodation and refractive error.

Authors:  N A McBrien; M Millodot
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  The sagittal growth of the eye. 1. Ultrasonic measurement of the depth of the anterior chamber from birth to puberty.

Authors:  J S Larsen
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1971

9.  Clinical evaluation of the Canon Autoref R-1.

Authors:  N A McBrien; M Millodot
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1985-11

10.  Progression of myopia in youth: age of cessation.

Authors:  D A Goss; R L Winkler
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1983-08
View more
  15 in total

1.  A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry.

Authors:  J Santodomingo-Rubido; E A H Mallen; B Gilmartin; J S Wolffsohn
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Accommodative lag and juvenile-onset myopia progression in children wearing refractive correction.

Authors:  David A Berntsen; Loraine T Sinnott; Donald O Mutti; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-02-20       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  Clinical and laboratory investigations of the relationship of accommodation and convergence function with refractive error. A literature review.

Authors:  D A Goss; H Zhai
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  The Study of Progression of Adult Nearsightedness (SPAN): design and baseline characteristics.

Authors:  Mark A Bullimore; Kathleen S Reuter; Lisa A Jones; G Lynn Mitchell; Jessica Zoz; Marjorie J Rah
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Study of Theories about Myopia Progression (STAMP) design and baseline data.

Authors:  David A Berntsen; Donald O Mutti; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Nature of the refractive errors in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) with experimentally induced ametropias.

Authors:  Ying Qiao-Grider; Li-Fang Hung; Chea-Su Kee; Ramkumar Ramamirtham; Earl L Smith
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  The response to visual form deprivation differs with age in marmosets.

Authors:  David Troilo; Debora L Nickla
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Vergence driven accommodation with simulated disparity in myopia and emmetropia.

Authors:  Guido Maiello; Kristen L Kerber; Frank Thorn; Peter J Bex; Fuensanta A Vera-Diaz
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 3.467

9.  Individual variations in human cone photoreceptor packing density: variations with refractive error.

Authors:  Toco Yuen Ping Chui; Hongxin Song; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Axial length targets for myopia control.

Authors:  Paul Chamberlain; Percy Lazon de la Jara; Baskar Arumugam; Mark A Bullimore
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.