| Literature DB >> 35822948 |
Marcos A Crespo1, Hiram J Jimenez2, Tanmay Deshmukh3, Jose S Pulido2, Ahmed Saeed Saad1, Frederick H Silver3,4, Dominick A Benedetto5, Christopher J Rapuano1, Zeba A Syed1.
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the in vivo elastic modulus of the human cornea using vibrational optical coherence tomography (VOCT).Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35822948 PMCID: PMC9288150 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.11.7.11
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol ISSN: 2164-2591 Impact factor: 3.048
Figure 1.(A) In vivo VOCT setup showing both the OCT device (‡) and speaker (*). (B) Schematic representation of the VOCT mechanism: transverse sound waves are emitted by a speaker, producing tissue vibrations detected as displacement by the OCT device.
Figure 2.Linear regression comparing VOCT and Pentacam central corneal thickness measurements showed a strong correlation between the two thickness measurements.
Figure 3.Representative output of frequency spectrum versus weighted displacement displaying resonant frequency peaks 1 to 5.
Resonant Frequency and Moduli Values for Peaks 1 to 5 for Central and Inferior Cornea
| Central Cornea | Inferior Cornea | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peak | Resonant Frequency (Hz), Mean ± SD | Modulus (MPa), Mean ± SD (95% CI) | Resonant Frequency (Hz), Mean ± SD | Modulus (MPa) Mean ± SD, (95% CI) |
| 1 | 73.5 ± 4.9 | 1.023 ± 0.104 | 72.1 ± 6.3 | 0.98 ± 0.15 |
| (1.009–1.037) | (0.96–0.99) | |||
| 2 | 120.4 ± 2.0 | 2.05 ± 0.16 | 120.3 ± 1.8 | 1.991 ± 0.236 |
| (2.03–2.07) | (1.961–2.020) | |||
| 3 | 148.7 ± 8.0 | 2.94 ± 0.40 | 147.2 ± 6.7 | 2.76 ± 0.28 |
| (2.89–3.00) | (2.71–2.81) | |||
| 4 | 207 ± 7 | 5.31 ± 0.37 | 205 ± 6 | 5.08 ± 0.73 |
| (5.23–5.40) | (4.95–5.22) | |||
| 5 | 239 ± 3 | 6.87 ± 0.33 | 238 ± 4 | 6.52 ± 0.79 |
| (6.81–6.93) | (6.40–6.65) | |||
CI, confidence interval.
Figure 4.Elastic modulus values for resonant frequency peaks 1 to 5 for (A) central and (B) inferior cornea in 32 eyes. The horizontal lines in the box-and-whisker plots represent the median values, and the boxes represent the lower and upper quartiles. The x represents the mean, and the bars represent minimum and maximum values within 1.5 times the lower and upper quartiles. The dots represent the outlier values.
Selected Methods for Corneal Biomechanical Analysis
| Methods | Corneal Biomechanical Property | Values | Measurement Approach | Limitations and Assumptions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uniaxial extension tests (extensiometry) | Elastic modulus | 0.8–2.2 MPa | A strip of corneal tissue is stretched while analyzing stress–strain relationship. | Destructive. |
| Ocular response analyzer | Hysteresis | 9.6 mm Hg | A high-speed air puff is delivered to the cornea, provoking a transient inward deformation of the cornea. An infrared beam that reflects from the cornea to a detector can detect the inward and outward deformation of the cornea; coupled with the pressure measurement at both deflections, a hysteresis value is determined. | Measurements are dependent on geometry and IOP. |
| Corvis ST | Elastic modulus | 0.71 MPa | A puff of air is applied to deform the cornea. The resulting corneal oscillations are observed using an ultra-high-speed camera. Computational algorithms are then able to process the images and determine different parameters. | Measurements are dependent on geometry and intraocular pressure (IOP). |
| Brillouin optical microscopy | Elastic modulus | 2.7 GPa | The spectral shift in Brillouin light scattering is measured, which is proportional to the longitudinal elastic modulus of the tissue. Brillouin optical microscopy allows for the measurement of corneal elastic modulus at different depths. | Measurements are susceptible to mass density, refractive index, and hydration levels. |
| Magnetic resonance elastography | Elastic modulus | 40–185 kPa | Magnetic resonance imaging is used to analyze tissue motion upon the application of mechanical vibrations. The phase shift observed is employed to calculate the elastic modulus. | Assumes isotropy, homogeneity, and almost complete incompressibility. |
| Optical coherence elastography | Elastic modulus | 11.52 kPa | Light is used to examine tissues based on the amount of reflected and nonreflected light an image produces. | Assumes linear elasticity, |
| Vibration optical coherence tomography (VOCT) | Elastic modulus | 0.98–6.87 MPa (This article) | Noninvasive and nondestructive approach that employs infrared light and audible sound to create transverse tissue displacement, which results in a spectrum of resonant frequencies that are recorded by measuring the displacement of the tissue as a function of frequency. The measured resonant frequencies are converted into elastic modulus values using a calibration equation. | Modulus calculation is dependent on the reliability of the calibration equation. The RF value obtained is precise within a ± 10-Hz range. |