| Literature DB >> 32832211 |
Vinicius S De Stefano1,2, Matthew R Ford1, Ibrahim Seven1, William J Dupps1,3,4.
Abstract
Purpose: Compare depth-resolved biomechanical properties in normal and keratoconic corneas in live human subjects using optical coherence elastography (OCE).Entities:
Keywords: corneal biomechanics; elastography; keratoconus; optical coherence tomography
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32832211 PMCID: PMC7414661 DOI: 10.1167/tvst.9.7.4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol ISSN: 2164-2591 Impact factor: 3.283
Demographic, Tomographic, and Biomechanical Variables for Normal and Keratoconic Eyes
| Scheimpflug Tomography | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient | Sex | Eye | Age | Spherical Equivalent Manifest Refraction (D) | IOP (mmHg) | Km (D) | kmax (D) | TPCT (µm) | Elastography ka/kp |
| Normal Subjects | |||||||||
| 1 | Male | OD | 29 | −4.38 | 15.5 | 41.6 | 42.5 | 529 | 1.156 |
| OS | −2.63 | 14.5 | 42.0 | 42.7 | 532 | 1.209 | |||
| 2 | Male | OD | 30 | +0.75 | 17.0 | 39.3 | 39.7 | 590 | 1.118 |
| OS | +0.50 | 16.0 | 39.4 | 39.9 | 603 | 1.263 | |||
| 3 | Female | OD | 60 | +3.00 | 15.5 | 42.2 | 43.0 | 543 | 1.146 |
| OS | +4.13 | 14.0 | 42.0 | 42.4 | 530 | 1.146 | |||
| 4 | Female | OD | 34 | −0.50 | 13.0 | 41.9 | 43.3 | 529 | 1.196 |
| OS | −0.75 | 13.0 | 42.2 | 43.7 | 526 | 1.130 | |||
| 5 | Female | OD | 32 | −4.13 | 17.0 | 41.8 | 43.0 | 535 | 1.008 |
| OS | −3.38 | 16.0 | 42.2 | 43.3 | 538 | 1.065 | |||
| 6 | Male | OS | 26 | −1.00 | 19.0 | 42.0 | 43.0 | 559 | 1.048 |
| 7 | Female | OS | 32 | −2.88 | 14.5 | 42.5 | 43.2 | 509 | 1.132 |
| 8 | Female | OD | 31 | −6.00 | 15.0 | 46.6 | 47.1 | 542 | 1.089 |
| OS | −6.25 | 15.0 | 46.7 | 47.2 | 537 | 1.094 | |||
| 9 | Male | OS | 23 | −0.25 | 18.5 | 44.7 | 45.4 | 591 | 1.093 |
| 10 | Male | OD | 39 | −3.63 | 12.5 | 45.3 | 46.0 | 536 | 1.095 |
| OS | −3.63 | 11.5 | 45.5 | 46.4 | 535 | 1.108 | |||
| 11 | Male | OD | 35 | +1.75 | 17.5 | 42.2 | 42.8 | 558 | 1.218 |
| OS | +2.13 | 16.0 | 42.1 | 43.1 | 543 | 1.313 | |||
| 12 | Female | OD | 34 | −6.75 | 18.5 | 42.4 | 42.9 | 586 | 1.122 |
| OS | −7.13 | 19.0 | 42.8 | 43.5 | 596 | 1.090 | |||
| Keratoconus Subjects | |||||||||
| 13 | Male | OD | 42 | −2.38 | 16.8 | 48.7 | 66.30 | 390 | 1.055 |
| 14 | Male | OS | 55 | −12.50 | 15.4 | 47.7 | 56.00 | 479 | 1.013 |
| 15 | Female | OD | 39 | +0.25 | 17.6 | 43.8 | 48.20 | 497 | 1.000 |
| 16 | Female | OD | 59 | 0 | 14.0 | 44.3 | 44.70 | 506 | 1.049 |
| OS | −0.25 | 17.0 | 45.0 | 45.18 | 489 | 1.071 | |||
| 17 | Female | OD | 43 | −0.63 | 7.0 | 46.2 | 54.70 | 442 | 1.151 |
| 18 | Female | OS | 34 | 0 | 10.0 | 52.2 | 58.30 | 448 | 1.063 |
| 18 | Male | OD | 42 | −0.38 | 11.0 | 48.0 | 54.60 | 464 | 1.063 |
| 19 | Male | OD | 27 | +2.75 | 11.2 | 52.6 | 63.0 | 398 | 1.044 |
| OS | +1.25 | 11.6 | 46.1 | 56.10 | 423 | 0.977 | |||
| 20 | Female | OS | 23 | +1.88 | 9.0 | 51.8 | 69.50 | 464 | 0.889 |
| 21 | Male | OD | 21 | −0.63 | 16 | 43.5 | 51.20 | 495 | 1.051 |
| OS | −1.00 | 17.5 | 43.3 | 50.50 | 482 | 1.045 | |||
| 22 | Male | OD | 57 | +1.75 | 11 | 47.5 | 59.90 | 413 | 0.800 |
| 23 | Male | OD | 28 | −2.75 | 10 | 43.4 | 43.90 | 473 | 1.041 |
| Controls (mean ± SD) | 34 ± 9 | −1.95 ± 3.29 | 15.6 ± 2.2 | 42.7 ± 2.0 | 43.5 ± 2.0 | 550 ± 27 | 1.14 ± 0.07 | ||
| Keratoconus (mean ± SD) | 39 ± 15 | −1.10 ± 3.54 | 13.0 ± 3.5 | 46.9 ± 3.3 | 54.8 ± 7.8 | 458 ± 37 | 1.02 ± 0.08 | ||
|
| 0.26 | 0.07 | 0.015 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | ||
Subjects 1–12, normal group; 13–22, keratoconus group.
Km, mean keratometry.
Statistically significant difference.
Mann-Whitney U test.
Figure 1.Left: schematic representation of the optical coherence elastography system. Right: picture of the prototype, with a focus on the transparent flat lens, force sensors, and translational stage. SS-OCT, swept-source optical coherence tomography system.
Figure 2.Examples of OCT elastography results for a normal eye (left column, panels A, C, E) and a keratoconus eye (right column, panels B, D, F). A, B: Corneal OCT scan obtained at the end of the elastography displacement series, capturing a full-thickness horizontal cross-section spanning a 5-mm width. Speckle tracking of raw OCT data was performed as described in the methods to derive displacement vectors. C, D: Map of OCT elastography–derived k values (local force/axial displacement relationship in grams/micrometer) overlaid on the raw OCT image. Color maps are on the same scale and demonstrate much lower (red) axial stiffness properties (k, in grams/micrometer) in the keratoconic eye than in the normal eye as well as absence of the relative anterior stromal stiffness advantage in keratoconus. E, F: Plot of depth-resolved displacement (red) and k (blue) values through a central corneal region of interest for the same eyes as in A–D. The scales in E and F differ and are normalized for each eye to highlight depth-dependent property differences. The magnitudes indicate higher axial displacements (left axis) at all depths in the keratoconic cornea and much lower force-to-displacement relationships (axial stiffness) through the keratoconic cornea (right axis). In addition to the differences in magnitudes, note the inversion of the normal anterior-to-posterior stromal stiffness distribution in keratoconus (blue tracing trending upward rather than downward toward the posterior stroma). This phenomenon drives significant group differences in the anterior-posterior ratio of k values (ka/kp, described in the text).
Figure 3.Additional elastograms of normal (left column) and keratoconus corneas (right column). The maps display k values (slope of the cumulative force/axial displacement relationship for each corneal point during the applanating perturbation) in grams/micrometer, and all share the same scale. Although a range of k value magnitudes are observed in both groups, normal corneas more consistently demonstrate a discrete band of higher (stiffer) k values (cooler colors) in the anterior one-third of the stroma, indicating less displacement and greater axial displacement resistance in that region. This preferential anterior stiffness is either absent or inverted in most keratoconus eyes, which tend to show a reduction in relative anterior stromal resistance to deformation.