Literature DB >> 35788766

[Coronary computed tomography and cardiac devices : Diagnostic results or nothing but artifacts?]

Silvia Smolka1, Stephan Achenbach2.   

Abstract

Coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography has become a major cornerstone in the diagnostic workup of cardiologic patients, particularly for evaluation of the coronary arteries and preprocedural planning of interventions for structural heart disease. Despite the possible problems that intensive electromagnetic radiation (including X‑rays) might cause when directly impacting on implanted cardiac devices, cardiac CT is a safe diagnostic test and should not be withheld from patients with devices if properly indicated. Sufficient image quality is paramount for the evaluation; hence, special attention should be paid to a low heart rate (< 60 bpm) and sufficient compliance with breathing instructions. Furthermore, pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) leads may cause metal artifacts, especially around the lead tip. Their dense material causes beam hardening and streak artifacts which may result in reduced image quality and limited diagnostic assessability. The prevalence of such artifacts depends not only on lead material but also on lead positioning relative to the gantry plane. Metal artifacts are more frequent in patients with unipolar leads and shock coils, which can impair the assessment of coronary arteries, mainly of the right coronary artery (RCA). Artifacts caused by left ventricular (LV) leads of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) systems tend to affect assessment of the left circumflex artery (LCX). By using dual energy CT and postprocessing algorithms, the impact of artifacts can be reduced and diagnostic image quality can be achieved in most cases. Unfortunately, the actual occurrence of such artifacts or the degree of impairment of image quality cannot be reliably predicted.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac diagnostics; Coronary diseases; Imaging quality; Implantable cardioverter–defibrillator; Pacemaker

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35788766     DOI: 10.1007/s00399-022-00876-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol        ISSN: 0938-7412


  16 in total

1.  Is metal artefact reduction mandatory in cardiac PET/CT imaging in the presence of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads?

Authors:  Pardis Ghafarian; S M R Aghamiri; Mohammad R Ay; Arman Rahmim; Thomas H Schindler; Osman Ratib; Habib Zaidi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Pacemaker Malfunction Attributed to Multidetector Cardiac Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Abdalla A Elagha; Gaby Weissman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Artifacts at Cardiac CT: Physics and Solutions.

Authors:  Kevin Kalisz; Ji Buethe; Sachin S Saboo; Suhny Abbara; Sandra Halliburton; Prabhakar Rajiah
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 5.333

4.  Safety of computed tomography in patients with cardiac rhythm management devices: assessment of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration advisory in clinical practice.

Authors:  Ayman A Hussein; Ameer Abutaleb; Jean Jeudy; Timothy Phelan; Ronak Patel; Melsjan Shkullaku; Faisal Siddiqi; Vincent See; Anastasios Saliaris; Stephen R Shorofsky; Timm Dickfeld
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Cardiac CT: Imaging of and Through Cardiac Devices.

Authors:  Gary S Mak; Quynh A Truong
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2012-10-01

6.  Computed tomography in patients with cardiac pacemakers: difficulties and solutions.

Authors:  Rafal Mlynarski; Maciej Sosnowski; Agnieszka Mlynarska; Michał Tendera
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Do implanted pacemaker leads and ICD leads cause metal-related artifact in cardiac PET/CT?

Authors:  Frank P DiFilippo; Richard C Brunken
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.057

8.  Learning metal artifact reduction in cardiac CT images with moving pacemakers.

Authors:  T Lossau Née Elss; H Nickisch; T Wissel; M Morlock; M Grass
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 8.545

9.  Effect of radiation therapy on permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator function.

Authors:  Akash Makkar; Joann Prisciandaro; Sunil Agarwal; Morgan Lusk; Laura Horwood; Jean Moran; Colleen Fox; James A Hayman; Hamid Ghanbari; Brett Roberts; Diego Belardi; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Thomas Crawford; Eric Good; Krit Jongnarangsin; Frank Bogun; Aman Chugh; Hakan Oral; Fred Morady; Frank Pelosi
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 6.343

10.  Reduction of CT artifacts from cardiac implantable electronic devices using a combination of virtual monoenergetic images and post-processing algorithms.

Authors:  Lenhard Pennig; David Zopfs; Roman Gertz; Johannes Bremm; Charlotte Zaeske; Nils Große Hokamp; Erkan Celik; Lukas Goertz; Marcel Langenbach; Thorsten Persigehl; Amit Gupta; Jan Borggrefe; Simon Lennartz; Kai Roman Laukamp
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.