| Literature DB >> 35782312 |
Mohammed Chalkha1, Asmae Nakkabi1,2, Taibi Ben Hadda3,4, Malika Berredjem5, Abdelfattah El Moussaoui6, Mohamed Bakhouch7, Mohamed Saadi8, Lahcen El Ammari8, Faisal A Almalki3, Hamid Laaroussi4, Violeta Jevtovic9, Mohamed El Yazidi1.
Abstract
The discovery and development of new potent antimicrobial and antioxidant agents is an essential lever to protect living beings against pathogenic microorganisms and free radicals. In this regard, new functionalized pyrazoles have been synthesized using a simple and accessible approach. The synthesized aminobenzoylpyrazoles 3a-h and pyrazole-sulfonamides 4a-g were obtained in good yields and were evaluated in vitro for their antimicrobial and antioxidant activities. The structures of the synthesized compounds were determined using IR, NMR, and mass spectrometry. The structure of the compound 4b was further confirmed by single crystal X-ray diffraction. The results of the in vitro screening show that the synthesized pyrazoles 3 and 4 exhibit a promising antimicrobial and antioxidant activities. Among the tested compounds, pyrazoles 3a, 3f, 4e, 4f, and 4g have exhibited remarkable antimicrobial activity against some microorganisms. In addition, compounds 3a, 3c, 3e, 4a, 4d, 4f, and 4g have shown a significant antioxidant activity in comparison with the standard butylhydroxytoluene (BHT). Hence, compounds 3a, 4f, and 4g represent interesting dual acting antimicrobial and antioxidant agents. In fact, pyrazole derivatives bearing sulfonamide moiety (4a-g) have displayed an important antimicrobial activity compared to pyrazoles 3a-h, this finding could be attributed to the synergistic effect of the pyrazole and sulfonamide pharmacophores. Furthermore, Molecular docking results revealed a good interaction of the synthesized compounds with the target proteins and provided important information about their interaction modes with the target enzyme. The results of the POM bioinformatics investigations (Petra, Osiris, Molinspiration) show that the studied heterocycles present a very good non toxicity profile, an excellent bioavailability, and pharmacokinetics. Finally, an antiviral pharmacophore (O δ-, O δ-) was evaluated in the POM investigations and deserves all our attention to be tested against Covid-19 and its Omicron and Delta mutants.Entities:
Keywords: Antimicrobial/Antioxidant bioactivity; Docking study; Identification of the pharmacophore sites; POM, Petra/Osiris/Molinspiration; PSH, Pyrazoles-Sulfonamide Hybrids; Petra/Osiris/Molinspiration (POM) analyses; Pyrazole Linked Sulfonamide Conjugates
Year: 2022 PMID: 35782312 PMCID: PMC9237569 DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.133605
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mol Struct ISSN: 0022-2860 Impact factor: 3.841
Fig. 1Target compounds design concept based on commercially antibiotic drug containing pyrazole and sulfonamide scaffolds.
Scheme 1Route of synthesis of compounds 4a-g.
Fig. 3Ortep drawing the structure of the title compound (4b) and its numbering scheme. Thermal ellipsoids were drawn at the 50 % probability level at 296 K.
Fig. 2Possible tautomers and their corresponding pharmacophore sites [POM Theory].
Fig. 4The crystal packing for the title compound, showing molecules linked by hydrogen bonds (dashed cyan lines) and π…π interactions (dashed green lines).
Antimicrobial activity (MIC, µg/mL) of the synthesized compounds (3a-h and 4a-g)
| Compd. | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H | H | 125 | 250 | 250 | 125 | |||
| H | Cl | 250 | 125 | 250 | 250 | 125 | 125 | |
| OCH3 | H | 250 | 125 | 250 | 250 | 125 | 125 | |
| OCH3 | Cl | 250 | 125 | 250 | 250 | 125 | 125 | |
| Cl | H | 250 | 250 | 250 | 125 | 250 | 250 | |
| Cl | Cl | 250 | 125 | 250 | 250 | 125 | ||
| Br | H | 250 | 250 | 125 | 125 | 125 | 250 | |
| Br | Cl | 250 | 125 | 250 | 250 | 125 | 125 | |
| H | H | 250 | 250 | 250 | 125 | 250 | 125 | |
| H | Cl | 250 | 125 | 250 | 250 | 125 | 125 | |
| OCH3 | H | 250 | 125 | 125 | 250 | 125 | 125 | |
| OCH3 | Cl | 250 | 125 | 125 | 250 | 125 | 125 | |
| Cl | H | 125 | 125 | 125 | 250 | 125 | ||
| Cl | Cl | 250 | 125 | 250 | 250 | |||
| Br | H | 125 | 125 | 125 | 125 | 125 | ||
| Streptomycin | — | — | 25 | 3.12 | — | 12.5 | — | — |
| Ampicillin | — | — | 50 | 25 | 1.56 | 25 | — | — |
| Fluconazole | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40 | 20 |
Bacteria strains : (Escherichia coli (ATB:57) B6N),(Klebsiella pneumoniae),(Pseudomonas aeruginosa),(Staphylococcus aureus); Fungal strains: (Candida albicans ATCC10231) and (Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC9763).
The antioxidant activity of the synthesized compounds and the BHT reference.
| Percentage inhibition of antioxidant activity of tested compounds | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H | H | - | |||||||
| H | Cl | - | 21.06±0.42 | 36.51±0.35 | 37.87±0.79 | 39.09±0.41 | 42.87±0.45 | 58.93±0.34 | |
| OCH3 | H | - | |||||||
| OCH3 | Cl | - | 2.7±0.63 | 18.93±0.34 | 22.27±0.3 | 23.78±0.28 | 42.72±0.43 | 62.87±0.68 | |
| Cl | H | - | |||||||
| Cl | Cl | - | 3.78±0.69 | 17.12±0.32 | 20.15±0.96 | 20.60±0.46 | 23.33±0.56 | 64.54±0.65 | |
| Br | H | - | 15±0.09 | 18.33±0.97 | 19.84±0.8 | 20.30±0.63 | 22.12±0.32 | 63.48±0.97 | |
| Br | Cl | - | 13.18±0.82 | 28.48±0.72 | 30.60±0.54 | 46.51±0.25 | 49.84±0.43 | 56.51±0.72 | |
| H | H | tosyl | |||||||
| H | Cl | tosyl | 3.63±0.64 | 5.75±0.24 | 14.39±0.35 | 32.27±0.63 | 43.78±0.82 | 59.69±0.93 | |
| OCH3 | H | tosyl | |||||||
| OCH3 | Cl | tosyl | 9.24±0.42 | 10.60±0.23 | 15±0.32 | 38.33±0.92 | 51.21±0.35 | 57.27±0.43 | |
| Cl | H | tosyl | 14.01±0.93 | 19.84±0.22 | 26.66±0.43 | 30±0.43 | 33.78±0.06 | 59.24±0.77 | |
| Cl | Cl | tosyl | |||||||
| Br | H | tosyl | |||||||
| — | — | — | 43.93±0.93 | 59.09±0.09 | 63.63±0.63 | 75.75±0.75 | 80.30±0.30 | 87.87±0.87 | |
Fig. 5Re-docking of the co-crystallized ligand (PDB ID: 3JQ9)
Fig. 6Molecular docking analysis of PSH derivatives (4c, 4e, 4f and 4g). Pose view of interaction with receptor DHPs.
Ranking of the PSH derivatives 4a-4g derivatives after docking study.
| Compds | Binding Energy (kcal/mol) | Vdw Energy | Electrostatic Energy | Nature of interactions | Amino acids on active sites with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4a | -6.01 | -8.46 | 0.06 | -Phe190- Ser222, Arg255 | |
| 4b | -6.48 | -8.72 | -0.14 | -Lys221, Phe190- Ser222, Arg255 | |
| 4c | -6.92 | -9.46 | -0.14 | -Phe190-Arg255, Thr62 | |
| 4d | -6.41 | -9.01 | -0.08 | ||
| 4e | -6.96 | -9.2 | -0.14 | ||
| 4f | |||||
| 4g | -Phe190, Lys221-Arg255, Thr62 | ||||
| co-crystallized ligand | -9.41 | -10.13 | -1.37 | -Phe190, Lys221 |
Fig. 7Atomic charge of tested compounds 3a-h and 4a-g.
Fig. 8Identification of potential Antiviral (O1, O2)-pharmacophore site.
Fig. 9Superimposition of docked pose and crystal structure pose of ligand RZG in wild type of SARS-CoV-2 main protease (PDB ID: 5R80).
Fig. 10Binding site structure of SARS-CoV-2 main protease-RZG.
Ranking of the pyrazole-sulfonamide derivatives after docking study.
| N° | protein | Compound | RMSD | Free Energy of Binding | Inhibition Constant, Ki | Amino acids involved in interactions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.00 | -5.27 | 137.38 uM | hydrogen bonding | |||
| hydrophobic interaction | |||||||
| 2 | 0.70 | -8.72 | 403.64 nM | hydrogen bonding | GLN189 | ||
| hydrophobic interaction | |||||||
| 3 | 0.00 | -6.85 | 9.59 uM | hydrogen bonding | ASN142, | ||
| hydrophobic interaction | |||||||
| 4 | 0.00 | -10.10 | 39.32 nM | hydrogen bonding | GLN189 | ||
| hydrophobic interaction | |||||||
| 5 | 0.00 | -7.64 | 1.98 uM | hydrogen bonding | |||
| hydrophobic interaction | MET165, MET49, GLU166, | ||||||
| 6 | 0.00 | -9.39 | 130.62 nM | hydrogen bonding | GLN189 | ||
| hydrophobic interaction | |||||||
| 7 | 0.00 | -6.10 | 33.57 uM | hydrogen bonding | |||
| hydrophobic interaction | |||||||
| 8 | 1.64 | -9.74 | 435.66 nM | hydrogen bonding | GLN 189 | ||
| hydrophobic interaction | |||||||
Fig. 11Binding site structure of SARS-CoV-2 main protease- 4f.