| Literature DB >> 35745284 |
Nicole Fakhoury Sayegh1, Gessica N H A Heraoui1, Hassan Younes2, Lea Nicole Sayegh3, Christa Boulos1, Raymond Sayegh4.
Abstract
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is considered the most common liver injury worldwide. NAFLD can evolve into non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) with or without fibrosis. The objectives of this study were to determine the nutritional profile and dietary patterns of NAFLD Lebanese patients and to report the type of diet-related to the presence of hepatic fibrosis. We hypothesized that the traditional pattern was related to a low risk of fibrosis. This cross-sectional study included 320 eligible Lebanese NAFLD patients. Three dietary patterns were identified: the Traditional diet, the High Fruit diet, and the Westernized diet. Multivariate analysis showed a significant relationship between high adherence to the traditional diet and absence of hepatic fibrosis with a decreased risk of 82%, p = 0.031 after adjusting for its covariables. Fruits were absent from this dietary pattern. Although our results pointed to a possible relationship between fibrosis in NAFLD patients and fruit intake, experimental studies are needed to show whether this is a causal relationship. However, the results obtained in this study may contribute to the planning of dietary interventions and recommendations and enable a better follow-up for NAFLD patients with fibrosis.Entities:
Keywords: dietary patterns; hepatic fibrosis; the high fruit diet; the traditional diet
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35745284 PMCID: PMC9229197 DOI: 10.3390/nu14122554
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 6.706
Figure 1Flow chart for selection and enrolment of the study participants. NAFLD: Non -Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, FFQ Food Frequency Questionnaire [11], International Diabetes Federation (IDF) [12].
Sociodemographic, clinical, and environmental parameters according to the NFS scores (n = 320).
| NFS Scores | Total ( | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <−1.45 | ≥−1.45 | |||
| Age (years), mean ± SD | 40.04 ± 0.11 | 47.65 ± 0.13 | 0.0001 | 43.34 ± 0.12 |
| Sex | ||||
| Male | 125 (65.5%) | 88 (67.9%) | 0.778 | 213 (66.5%) |
| Female | 66 (34.5%) | 41 (32.1%) | 107 (33.6%) | |
| Place of residence, | ||||
| Mount Lebanon | 57 (29.8%) | 54 (41.9%) | 0.314 | 111 (34.7%) |
| North | 23 (11.9%) | 6 (4.7%) | 29 (9.1%) | |
| South | 14 (7.4%) | 9 (6.9%) | 23 (7.2%) | |
| Beirut | 47 (24.4%) | 30 (23.6%) | 77 (24.1%) | |
| Bekaa | 22 (11.4%) | 11 (8.5%) | 33 (10.3%) | |
| Nabatieh | 17 (9.1%) | 13 (10.1%) | 30 (9.3%) | |
| Abroad | 11 (5.7%) | 6 (4.7%) | 17 (5.3%) | |
| Marital Status, | ||||
| Single | 42 (22.0%) | 24 (18.9%) | 0.853 | 66 (20.6%) |
| Married | 144 (75.4%) | 100 (77.5%) | 244 (75.9%) | |
| Divorced | 3 (1.6%) | 4 (2.8%) | 7 (2.10%) | |
| Widow/er | 2 (1.04%) | 1 (0.8%) | 3 (1.10%) | |
| Academic level, | ||||
| Illiterate | 1 (0.6%) | 2 (1.5%) | 0.329 | 3 (0.9%) |
| Elementary | 15 (8.0%) | 18 (13.9%) | 33 (10.3%) | |
| Intermediate, Secondary | 72 (37.4%) | 43 (33.3%) | 115 (35.9%) | |
| University | 103 (54.0%) | 66 (51.2%) | 169 (52.8%) | |
| Occupation, | ||||
| Self-employed | 85 (44.6%) | 53 (41%) | 0.001 | 138 (43.1%) |
| Employee | 60 (31.4%) | 40 (31.4%) | 100 (31.2%) | |
| Retired/unemployment | 36 (18.9%) | 32 (24.7%) | 68 (21.2%) | |
| Others | 10 (5.2%) | 4 (3.1%) | 14 (4.4%) | |
| Crowding index †, | ||||
| ≤1 | 144 (75.4%) | 103 (79.8%) | 0.53 | 247 (77.1%) |
| >1 | 47 (24.6%) | 26 (20.2%) | 73 (22.9%) | |
| Presence of metabolic syndrome, | 155 (81.2%) | 114 (88.5%) | 0.156 | 269 (83.9%) |
| Obesity (yes), | 103 (53.9%) | 101 (78.2%) | 0.001 | 204 (63.7%) |
| CVD (yes), | 8 (4.2%) | 21(16%) | 0.0001 | 29 (9.1%) |
| Family medical history (yes), | 167 (87.6%) | 104 (81.0%) | 0.182 | 271 (84.7%) |
| Smoking (yes), | 78 (40.8%) | 55(42.6%) | 0.187 | 133 (41.5%) |
| Physical Activities (Kcals)(yes) | 41 (21.46%) | 23 (17.82%) | 0.469 | 64 (20%) |
| Energy intake (kcal), (M), mean ± SD | 4525.8 ± 0.2 | 4127.6 ± 0.2 | 0.110 | 4162.9 ± 0.2 |
| Energy intake (kcal), (F), mean ± SD | 2829.4 ± 0.2 | 2731.5 ± 0.3 | 0.737 | 2747.3 ± 0.3 |
| Waist circumference (cm) (M)≥ 94 § (F) ≥80 § | 130 (68.2%) | 107 (83.0%) | 0.006 | 237 (74.2%) |
| Waist/hip ratio | 144 (75.6%) | 103 (79.6%) | 0.438 | 247 (77.3%) |
| Diabetes type 2, | 25 (13.0%) | 43 (33.0%) | 0.0001 | 68 (21.2%) |
| Homa > 3, | 92 (48.3%) | 66 (51.5%) | 0.697 | 158 (49.4%) |
| ASAT/ALAT ≥ 1 | 29 (15.3%) | 34 (26.4%) | 0.032 | 63 (19.7%) |
| Current dietary ** supplementation use, | 81 (42.4%) | 70 (54.3%) | 0.053 | 151 (47.2%) |
Continuous variables were reported as geometric means± standard deviations. Categorical variables were reported as numbers and percentage. Statistical tests used: independent, t-test (continuous variables), test χ2-test (categorical variables). SD, standard deviation, p < 0.05. † crowding index: amount of residents/number of rooms. § waist circumference and waist to hip ration: values according to the IDF, 2009 (M/F). ** Current dietary supplementation use; 75% of supplements were Vit D.
Figure 2Dietary patterns distribution between males and females (n = 320).
Factor loading matrix for the three identified dietary patterns in the study population.
| Food Group | Pattern | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional Lebanese | High Fruits | Westernized | |
| Vegetables | 0.85 | ||
| Chickpeas, red beans, lentils, peas | 0.50 | ||
| Vegetable oil/olives | 0.33 | 0.20 | |
| Almonds, walnuts, hazelnuts, sesames | 0.27 | ||
| Fish | 0.21 | ||
| Sea Food | 0.36 | ||
| Red Wine | 0.21 | ||
| Fruits and fruit juices | 0.73 | ||
| Hamburger and fries | 0.63 | ||
| Beef meat | 0.53 | ||
| Chicken | 0.53 | ||
| Carbonated beverages | 0.52 | ||
| Pizza | 0.52 | ||
| Chips | 0.50 | ||
| Pork | 0.41 | ||
| Hot Dog | 0.45 | ||
| Ketchup | 0.50 | ||
| Mayonnaise or mustard | 0.41 | ||
| 1 chicken egg | 0.44 | ||
| Spaghetti or noodles | 0.41 | ||
| Cooked rice | 0.24 | 0.39 | |
| Pies or fatayer | 0.39 | ||
| Bread | 0.27 | ||
| Desserts, Arabic pastries | 0.30 | ||
| Milk chocolate | 0.39 | ||
| Laban/Lebanese yogurt | 0.25 | ||
| Energy drink | 0.22 | ||
| Beer | 0.21 | ||
| Pop Corn | 0.20 | ||
| Percent variance explained by each pattern | 18.22% | 9.84% | 7.22% |
Extraction method: principal component analysis; Rotation method: Varimax with Kaiser normalization; Absolute values ≤ 0.2 were excluded from the table.
Association between dietary patterns, sociodemographic and clinical characteristics in the study population.
| Traditional Lebanese | High Fruits | Westernized | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | CI | OR | CI | OR | CI | |
| Age (years) | 1.60 | 1.03–1.09 * | 1.01 | 0.98–1.03 | 0.92 | 0.89–0.95 * |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 0.90 | 0.91–1.02 | 0.95 | 0.89–1.01 | 1.11 | 1.04–1.18 * |
| Education ** (university level/others) | 2.90 | 1.50–5.76 * | 0.50 | 0.27–0.91 * | 0.76 | 0.39–1.48 |
* Test statistic; Multivariate -adjusted OR (95% CI) using binary logistic regression, p < 0.05. The Model was adjusted for gender, crowding index, presence of metabolic syndrome (no/yes), physical activity (yes/no), family history (no/yes), marital status (married, single, widow), smoking (no/yes) and profession (freelance, employee, unemployed, retirement and others). ** Education (university level versus illiterate, primary, secondary, and high school level).
Hepatic fibrosis across tertiles (T) of dietary pattern scores.
| Dietary Pattern | T1 | T2 | T3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Traditional Lebanese | ||||
| Crude Model | Ref * | 0.41 (0.15–1.12) | 0.36 (0.13–1.03) | 0.057 |
| Model 1 | Ref | 0.31 (0.99–1.18) | 0.21 (0.07–0.82) ‡ | 0.024 |
| Model 2 | Ref | 0.32 (0.07–1.21) | 0.18 (0.04–0.79) ‡ | 0.023 |
| Model 3 | Ref | 0.42 (0.11–1.96) | 0.18 (0.04–0.85) ‡ | 0.031 |
| High Fruits | ||||
| Crude Model | Ref | 1.22 (0.42–3.53) | 0.98 (0.32–3.02) | 0.969 |
| Model 1 | Ref | 1.68 (0.39–7.11) | 1.05 (0.24–4.69) | 0.943 |
| Model 2 | Ref | 1.59 (0.32–7.93) | 1.06 (0.21–5.35) | 0.946 |
| Model 3 | Ref | 2.53 (0.43–14.97) | 1.78 (0.28–11.17) | 0.537 |
| Westernized | ||||
| Crude Model | Ref | 1.51 (0.47–4.82) | 1.03 (0.31–3.39) | 0.956 |
| Model 1 | Ref | 1.78 (0.53–6.01) | 1.41 (0.38–5.28) | 0.606 |
| Model 2 | Ref | 2.43 (0.59–9.99) | 1.19 (0.28–5.02) | 0.813 |
| Model 3 | Ref | 2.22 (0.51–9.61) | 1.04 (0.24–4.51) | 0.959 |
‡ Test statistic; Multivariate -adjusted OR (95%CI) using binary logistic regression, p < 0.05. The Model 1 was adjusted for age, gender, and the crowding index. Model 2; Model 1 + presence of metabolic syndrome (no/yes), physical activity (yes/no), obesity (no, yes), diabetes type 2 (no, yes), family history (no/yes) and smoking (no/yes). Model 3; Model 2 adjusted for marital status (married, single, widow), education (illiterate, primary, high school, and university) and profession (freelance, employee, unemployed, retirement and others). * Ref referred to the first tertile of dietary pattern (low adherence to the corresponding dietary pattern).
Hepatic fibrosis across tertiles of food groups.
| Food Groups | Tertile 1 | Tertile 2 | Tertile 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fructose (g/day) | Ref * | 1.07(0.52–2.20) | 1.15(0.54–2.45) | 0.718 |
| Fibres (g/day) | Ref | 0.67(0.32–1.39) | 1.24(0.61–2.52) | 0.554 |
| Monounsaturated Fatty acids (g/day) | Ref | 0.91(0.45–1.84) | 0.69(0.33–1.46) | 0.342 |
| Polyunsaturated Fatty acids (g/day) | Ref | 0.77 (0.39–1.52) | 0.65(0.31–1.36) | 0.253 |
| Saturated Fatty acids (g/day) | Ref | 1.50 (0.74–3.06) | 0.83(0.38–1.83) | 0.653 |
| ω-3 (g/day) | Ref | 1.12 (0.55–2.29) | 1.03(0.49–2.16) | 0.944 |
| ω-6 (g/day) | (1.20–13.70) | (13.71–19.01) | (19.02–52.70) | 0.922 |
| Cholesterol (mg/day) | Ref | 0.79 (0.39–1.61) | 1.10(0.52–2.30) | 0.792 |
| Protein (g/day) | Ref | 0.91 (0.43–1.91) | 0.65(0.28–1.50) | 0.311 |
| Fat (g/day) | Ref | 1.06 (0.50–2.23) | 0.55(0.24–1.26) | 0.159 |
| Simple Carbohydrates (g/day) | (8.15–101.4) | (101.50–164.69) | (164.70–469.64) | 0.099 |
| EPA (mg/day) | (0.1–2.0) | (2.10–5.0) | (5.1–160) | 0.357 |
| DHA (mg/day) | (0.1–1.0) | (1.1–9.0) | (9.1–230) | 0.212 |
| Energy/day (Kcals), males | Ref | 0.63 (0.26–1.57) | 1.01 (0.38–2.64) | 0.994 |
| Energy/day (Kcals), females | Ref | 2.27 (0.48–10.80) | 1.53 (0.33–7.09) | 0.587 |
Test statistic; § Multivariate -adjusted OR (95%CI) using binary logistic regression, p < 0.05. The Model is adjusted for age, gender, crowding index, presence of metabolic syndrome(no/yes), obesity (no, yes), diabetes type 2 (no, yes) physical activity (yes/no), family history (no/yes), marital status (married, single, widow), smoking (no/yes), education (illiterate, primary, high school, and university) and profession (freelance, employee, unemployed, retirement and others). * Ref referred to the first tertile of nutrients consumed (g/day).