UNLABELLED: The rising incidence of obesity and diabetes coincides with a marked increase in fructose consumption. Fructose consumption is higher in individuals with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) than in age-matched and body mass index (BMI)-matched controls. Because fructose elicits metabolic perturbations that may be hepatotoxic, we investigated the relationship between fructose consumption and disease severity in NAFLD. We studied 427 adults enrolled in the NASH Clinical Research Network for whom Block food questionnaire data were collected within 3 months of a liver biopsy. Fructose consumption was estimated based on reporting (frequency x amount) of Kool-aid, fruit juices, and nondietary soda intake, expressed as servings per week, and classified into none, minimum to moderate (<7 servings/week), and daily (> or =7 servings/week). The association of fructose intake with metabolic and histological features of NAFLD was analyzed using multiple linear and ordinal logistic regression analyses with and without controlling for other confounding factors. Increased fructose consumption was univariately associated with decreased age (P < 0.0001), male sex (P < 0.0001), hypertriglyceridemia (P < 0.04), low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (<0.0001), decreased serum glucose (P < 0.001), increased calorie intake (P < 0.0001), and hyperuricemia (P < 0.0001). After controlling for age, sex, BMI, and total calorie intake, daily fructose consumption was associated with lower steatosis grade and higher fibrosis stage (P < 0.05 for each). In older adults (age > or = 48 years), daily fructose consumption was associated with increased hepatic inflammation (P < 0.05) and hepatocyte ballooning (P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients with NAFLD, daily fructose ingestion is associated with reduced hepatic steatosis but increased fibrosis. These results identify a readily modifiable environmental risk factor that may ameliorate disease progression in patients with NAFLD.
UNLABELLED: The rising incidence of obesity and diabetes coincides with a marked increase in fructose consumption. Fructose consumption is higher in individuals with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) than in age-matched and body mass index (BMI)-matched controls. Because fructose elicits metabolic perturbations that may be hepatotoxic, we investigated the relationship between fructose consumption and disease severity in NAFLD. We studied 427 adults enrolled in the NASH Clinical Research Network for whom Block food questionnaire data were collected within 3 months of a liver biopsy. Fructose consumption was estimated based on reporting (frequency x amount) of Kool-aid, fruit juices, and nondietary soda intake, expressed as servings per week, and classified into none, minimum to moderate (<7 servings/week), and daily (> or =7 servings/week). The association of fructose intake with metabolic and histological features of NAFLD was analyzed using multiple linear and ordinal logistic regression analyses with and without controlling for other confounding factors. Increased fructose consumption was univariately associated with decreased age (P < 0.0001), male sex (P < 0.0001), hypertriglyceridemia (P < 0.04), low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (<0.0001), decreased serum glucose (P < 0.001), increased calorie intake (P < 0.0001), and hyperuricemia (P < 0.0001). After controlling for age, sex, BMI, and total calorie intake, daily fructose consumption was associated with lower steatosis grade and higher fibrosis stage (P < 0.05 for each). In older adults (age > or = 48 years), daily fructose consumption was associated with increased hepatic inflammation (P < 0.05) and hepatocyte ballooning (P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients with NAFLD, daily fructose ingestion is associated with reduced hepatic steatosis but increased fibrosis. These results identify a readily modifiable environmental risk factor that may ameliorate disease progression in patients with NAFLD.
Authors: Naga P Chalasani; Arun J Sanyal; Kris V Kowdley; Patricia R Robuck; Jay Hoofnagle; David E Kleiner; Aynur Unalp; James Tonascia Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2008-09-10 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Richard J Johnson; Mark S Segal; Yuri Sautin; Takahiko Nakagawa; Daniel I Feig; Duk-Hee Kang; Michael S Gersch; Steven Benner; Laura G Sánchez-Lozada Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Kate S Collison; Marya Z Zaidi; Soad M Saleh; Nadine J Makhoul; Angela Inglis; Joey Burrows; Joseph A Araujo; Futwan A Al-Mohanna Journal: Genes Nutr Date: 2011-12-06 Impact factor: 5.523
Authors: Michael K Pickens; Hisanobu Ogata; Russell K Soon; James P Grenert; Jacquelyn J Maher Journal: Liver Int Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 5.828
Authors: Rosangela A Pereira; Amanda M Souza; Kiyah J Duffey; Rosely Sichieri; Barry M Popkin Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2014-08-27 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Miguel A Lanaspa; Laura G Sanchez-Lozada; Yea-Jin Choi; Christina Cicerchi; Mehmet Kanbay; Carlos A Roncal-Jimenez; Takuji Ishimoto; Nanxing Li; George Marek; Murat Duranay; George Schreiner; Bernardo Rodriguez-Iturbe; Takahiko Nakagawa; Duk-Hee Kang; Yuri Y Sautin; Richard J Johnson Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2012-10-03 Impact factor: 5.157