| Literature DB >> 35735936 |
Aswani Kumar Gera1, Rajesh Kumar Burra1.
Abstract
The current scenario of the quest for microneedles (MNs) with biodegradability and biocompatibility properties is a potential research area of interest. Microneedles are considered to be robust, can penetrate the skin's deep-seated layers, and are easy to manufacture, and their applications from the clinical perspective are still ongoing with standard escalation. This review paper focuses on some of the pivotal variants of polymeric microneedles which are specifically dissolvable and swell-based MNs. It further explores the drug dissolution kinetics and insertion behavior mechanisms with an emphasis on the need for mathematical modeling of MNs. This review further evaluates the multifarious fabrication methods, with an update on the advances in the fabrication of polymeric MNs, the choice of materials used for the fabrication, the challenges in polymeric MN fabrication, and the prospects of polymeric MNs with applications pertinent to healthcare, by exclusively focusing on the procurable literature over the last decade.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; polymeric microneedle; polymers; skin; transdermal drug delivery
Year: 2022 PMID: 35735936 PMCID: PMC9224958 DOI: 10.3390/jfb13020081
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Funct Biomater ISSN: 2079-4983
Figure 1Publications on polymeric micro needles in the last decade. The above bar chart displays the incremental rise in published work on polymeric MNs over the last 10 years (2012–2022). Data accessed from National Library of Medicine (PubMed) on 9 March 2022.
Typical polymers—general properties and fabrication of polymeric MNs.
| Material | Advantages | Limitations | Fabrication Techniques | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. PVA | Low material costs | Greater rate of absorbency | Molding fused deposition method (FDM) | [ |
| 2. PLGA | Preparation of dissolving microneedles (MNs) | Material costs are high | Molding, hot embossing | [ |
| 3. HA | Faster rate of dissolving | Chances of skin irritability | Micro-molding | [ |
| 4. PCL | Good thermal stability | Process of slow degradation | 3D printing, micro-molding | [ |
| 5. PEGDA | Can penetrate easily into molecular spaces | High material cost | Photolithography | [ |
| 6. PGA | Faster rate of degradation | High material cost | Injection molding technique | [ |
| 7. PLA | Higher rates of tensile strength | Costly material | Molding | [ |
| 8. PVP | Good plasticity and dissolvability | Difficulty in fabrication | Molding and photo | [ |
| 9. PDMS | Good biocompatibility and flexibility | Less penetrability | Micro-molding, curing | [ |
| 10. Poly (Ethylene Glycol-co-methacrylic-acid) | Good biocompatibility | Good drug transport mechanism | Bulk polymerization | [ |
| 11. Cellulose acetate | Good base material | Bio fluid extractions/insulin delivery | Mold casting method | [ |
| 12. PGMA | Good penetration efficiency | Drug delivery/ISF sampling | photopolymerization | [ |
Abbreviations: PVA: polyvinyl alcohol, PLGA: poly lactic-co-glycolic acid, HA: hyaluronic acid, PEGDA: poly (ethylene glycol) diacrylate, PGA: polyglycolide; PLA: poly (lactic acid), PVP: polyvinylpyrrolidone, PDMS, Poly (Ethylene glycol-co-methacrylic-acid), PGMA: Poly Glycidyl methacrylate.
Figure 2Basic parameters—design and performance of polymeric MNs.
Figure 3Graphical illustration of permeation of conventional hypodermic needle vs. MNs when inserted into the skin layers. The image is reproduced with permission from [60], Elsevier, 2011.
Figure 4A graphical representation of the DMN manufacturing process, which employs the droplet air-born method. (A) Dispensing of biopolymers on a flat surface for the fabrication of a base structure. (B) Drug-containing droplets are dispersed across the base structure. The contact of dispensed particle droplets is caused by the downward movement of the upper plate. (C) The point of contact of the dispensed droplet. (D) Regulating microneedle length. (E) Droplet solidification mediated by air blowing to shape microneedle structure. (F) Plate separation dissolves microneedle arrays on the upper and lower plates. The image is adapted from [86], Elsevier, 2013. Droplet-born air blowing (DAB) technology for creating polymeric MNs.
Figure 5Graphical representation of 3D printing process of polymeric MNs.
Figure 6Schematic inversion fabrication technique for porous polymeric micro needles. Reproduced with permission from [45].
Figure 7Schematic diagram of fabrication process for porous-based polymeric microneedles. Reproduced with permission from [46].
Figure 8Current microneedle devices. (A) Microstructured transdermal system (MTS). (B) Microinfusor. (C) Macroflux®. (D) Microneedle Therapy System (MTS Roller™). (E) Micro-trans™. (F) h-patch™. (G) Micron Jet. (H) Intanza®. Reproduced with permission from [43].
Figure 9Eye contact path for ocular drug delivery. Reproduced with permission from [44] Nature Publishing Group.