Literature DB >> 28666680

The safety, immunogenicity, and acceptability of inactivated influenza vaccine delivered by microneedle patch (TIV-MNP 2015): a randomised, partly blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial.

Nadine G Rouphael1, Michele Paine2, Regina Mosley2, Sebastien Henry3, Devin V McAllister3, Haripriya Kalluri3, Winston Pewin3, Paula M Frew4, Tianwei Yu5, Natalie J Thornburg2, Sarah Kabbani2, Lilin Lai2, Elena V Vassilieva6, Ioanna Skountzou6, Richard W Compans6, Mark J Mulligan2, Mark R Prausnitz3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microneedle patches provide an alternative to conventional needle-and-syringe immunisation, and potentially offer improved immunogenicity, simplicity, cost-effectiveness, acceptability, and safety. We describe safety, immunogenicity, and acceptability of the first-in-man study on single, dissolvable microneedle patch vaccination against influenza.
METHODS: The TIV-MNP 2015 study was a randomised, partly blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 1, clinical trial at Emory University that enrolled non-pregnant, immunocompetent adults from Atlanta, GA, USA, who were aged 18-49 years, naive to the 2014-15 influenza vaccine, and did not have any significant dermatological disorders. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to four groups and received a single dose of inactivated influenza vaccine (fluvirin: 18 μg of haemagglutinin per H1N1 vaccine strain, 17 μg of haemagglutinin per H3N2 vaccine strain, and 15 μg of haemagglutinin per B vaccine strain) (1) by microneedle patch or (2) by intramuscular injection, or received (3) placebo by microneedle patch, all administered by an unmasked health-care worker; or received a single dose of (4) inactivated influenza vaccine by microneedle patch self-administered by study participants. A research pharmacist prepared the randomisation code using a computer-generated randomisation schedule with a block size of 4. Because of the nature of the study, participants were not masked to the type of vaccination method (ie, microneedle patch vs intramuscular injection). Primary safety outcome measures are the incidence of study product-related serious adverse events within 180 days, grade 3 solicited or unsolicited adverse events within 28 days, and solicited injection site and systemic reactogenicity on the day of study product administration through 7 days after administration, and secondary safety outcomes are new-onset chronic illnesses within 180 days and unsolicited adverse events within 28 days, all analysed by intention to treat. Secondary immunogenicity outcomes are antibody titres at day 28 and percentages of seroconversion and seroprotection, all determined by haemagglutination inhibition antibody assay. The trial is completed and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02438423.
FINDINGS: Between June 23, 2015, and Sept 25, 2015, 100 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to a group. There were no treatment-related serious adverse events, no treatment-related unsolicited grade 3 or higher adverse events, and no new-onset chronic illnesses. Among vaccinated groups (vaccine via health-care worker administered microneedle patch or intramuscular injection, or self-administered microneedle patch), overall incidence of solicited adverse events (n=89 vs n=73 vs n=73) and unsolicited adverse events (n=18 vs n=12 vs n=14) were similar. Reactogenicity was mild, transient, and most commonly reported as tenderness (15 [60%] of 25 participants [95% CI 39-79]) and pain (11 [44%] of 25 [24-65]) after intramuscular injection; and as tenderness (33 [66%] of 50 [51-79]), erythema (20 [40%] of 50 [26-55]), and pruritus (41 [82%] of 50 [69-91]) after vaccination by microneedle patch application. The geometric mean titres were similar at day 28 between the microneedle patch administered by a health-care worker versus the intramuscular route for the H1N1 strain (1197 [95% CI 855-1675] vs 997 [703-1415]; p=0·5), the H3N2 strain (287 [192-430] vs 223 [160-312]; p=0·4), and the B strain (126 [86-184] vs 94 [73-122]; p=0·06). Similar geometric mean titres were reported in participants who self-administered the microneedle patch (all p>0·05). The seroconversion percentages were significantly higher at day 28 after microneedle patch vaccination compared with placebo (all p<0·0001) and were similar to intramuscular injection (all p>0·01).
INTERPRETATION: Use of dissolvable microneedle patches for influenza vaccination was well tolerated and generated robust antibody responses. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28666680      PMCID: PMC5578828          DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30575-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  23 in total

1.  Survey of the prevalence of immunization non-compliance due to needle fears in children and adults.

Authors:  Anna Taddio; Moshe Ipp; Suganthan Thivakaran; Ali Jamal; Chaitya Parikh; Sarah Smart; Julia Sovran; Derek Stephens; Joel Katz
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 2.  Microneedle applications in improving skin appearance.

Authors:  Maelíosa T C McCrudden; Emma McAlister; Aaron J Courtenay; Patricia González-Vázquez; Thakur Raghu Raj Singh; Ryan F Donnelly
Journal:  Exp Dermatol       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.960

Review 3.  Efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael T Osterholm; Nicholas S Kelley; Alfred Sommer; Edward A Belongia
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 25.071

4.  Improved immunogenicity of individual influenza vaccine components delivered with a novel dissolving microneedle patch stable at room temperature.

Authors:  Elena V Vassilieva; Haripriya Kalluri; Devin McAllister; Misha T Taherbhai; E Stein Esser; Winston P Pewin; Joanna A Pulit-Penaloza; Mark R Prausnitz; Richard W Compans; Ioanna Skountzou
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.617

5.  Estimates of deaths associated with seasonal influenza --- United States, 1976-2007.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 17.586

6.  An economic model assessing the value of microneedle patch delivery of the seasonal influenza vaccine.

Authors:  Bruce Y Lee; Sarah M Bartsch; Mercy Mvundura; Courtney Jarrahian; Kristina M Zapf; Kathleen Marinan; Angela R Wateska; Bill Snyder; Savitha Swaminathan; Erica Jacoby; James J Norman; Mark R Prausnitz; Darin Zehrung
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Clinical study and stability assessment of a novel transcutaneous influenza vaccination using a dissolving microneedle patch.

Authors:  Sachiko Hirobe; Hiroaki Azukizawa; Takaaki Hanafusa; Kazuhiko Matsuo; Ying-Shu Quan; Fumio Kamiyama; Ichiro Katayama; Naoki Okada; Shinsaku Nakagawa
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 8.  Skin immunization with influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Ioanna Skountzou; Richard W Compans
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.291

9.  Surveillance of Vaccination Coverage Among Adult Populations - United States, 2014.

Authors:  Walter W Williams; Peng-Jun Lu; Alissa O'Halloran; David K Kim; Lisa A Grohskopf; Tamara Pilishvili; Tami H Skoff; Noele P Nelson; Rafael Harpaz; Lauri E Markowitz; Alfonso Rodriguez-Lainz; Carolyn B Bridges
Journal:  MMWR Surveill Summ       Date:  2016-02-05

10.  Immunogenicity, reactogenicity and safety of an inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine candidate versus inactivated trivalent influenza vaccine: a phase III, randomized trial in adults aged ≥18 years.

Authors:  Dorothee Kieninger; Eric Sheldon; Wen-Yuan Lin; Chong-Jen Yu; Jose M Bayas; Julian J Gabor; Meral Esen; Jose Luis Fernandez Roure; Silvia Narejos Perez; Carmen Alvarez Sanchez; Yang Feng; Carine Claeys; Mathieu Peeters; Bruce L Innis; Varsha Jain
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.090

View more
  98 in total

1.  Engineering Biomaterials to Direct Innate Immunity.

Authors:  R S Oakes; E Froimchuk; C M Jewell
Journal:  Adv Ther (Weinh)       Date:  2019-02-27

Review 2.  Microneedle-Mediated Vaccine Delivery to the Oral Mucosa.

Authors:  Rachel L Creighton; Kim A Woodrow
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 3.  Polymeric microneedles for transdermal protein delivery.

Authors:  Yanqi Ye; Jicheng Yu; Di Wen; Anna R Kahkoska; Zhen Gu
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 15.470

4.  Enhancing humoral immunity via sustained-release implantable microneedle patch vaccination.

Authors:  Archana V Boopathy; Anasuya Mandal; Daniel W Kulp; Sergey Menis; Nitasha R Bennett; Hannah C Watkins; Wade Wang; Jacob T Martin; Nikki T Thai; Yanpu He; William R Schief; Paula T Hammond; Darrell J Irvine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  M-protein based vaccine induces immunogenicity and protection from Streptococcus pyogenes when delivered on a high-density microarray patch (HD-MAP).

Authors:  Jamie-Lee S Mills; Cesar M Jayashi Flores; Manisha Pandey; Michael F Good; Simone Reynolds; Christine Wun; Ainslie Calcutt; S Ben Baker; Senthil Murugappan; Alexandra C I Depelsenaire; Jessica Dooley; Paul V Fahey; Angus H Forster
Journal:  NPJ Vaccines       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 7.344

6.  Biocompatible near-infrared quantum dots delivered to the skin by microneedle patches record vaccination.

Authors:  Kevin J McHugh; Lihong Jing; Sean Y Severt; Mache Cruz; Morteza Sarmadi; Hapuarachchige Surangi N Jayawardena; Collin F Perkinson; Fridrik Larusson; Sviatlana Rose; Stephanie Tomasic; Tyler Graf; Stephany Y Tzeng; James L Sugarman; Daniel Vlasic; Matthew Peters; Nels Peterson; Lowell Wood; Wen Tang; Jihyeon Yeom; Joe Collins; Philip A Welkhoff; Ari Karchin; Megan Tse; Mingyuan Gao; Moungi G Bawendi; Robert Langer; Ana Jaklenec
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 17.956

7.  Heterosubtypic influenza protection elicited by double-layered polypeptide nanoparticles in mice.

Authors:  Lei Deng; Timothy Z Chang; Ye Wang; Song Li; Shelly Wang; Shingo Matsuyama; Guoying Yu; Richard W Compans; Jian-Dong Li; Mark R Prausnitz; Julie A Champion; Bao-Zhong Wang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  3D-Printing of Functional Biomedical Microdevices via Light- and Extrusion-Based Approaches.

Authors:  Henry H Hwang; Wei Zhu; Grace Victorine; Natalie Lawrence; Shaochen Chen
Journal:  Small Methods       Date:  2017-12-19

Review 9.  An update on coating/manufacturing techniques of microneedles.

Authors:  Tamara N Tarbox; Alan B Watts; Zhengrong Cui; Robert O Williams
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.617

10.  Feasibility of Hepatitis B Vaccination by Microneedle Patch: Cellular and Humoral Immunity Studies in Rhesus Macaques.

Authors:  Youkyung H Choi; Monica B Perez-Cuevas; Maja Kodani; Xiugen Zhang; Mark R Prausnitz; Saleem Kamili; Siobhan M O'Connor
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.