Literature DB >> 3572299

Choice between sequences of fixed-ratio schedules: effects of ratio values and probability of food delivery.

A Poling, E Blakely, V Pellettiere, M Picker.   

Abstract

Pigeons were exposed to schedules of food delivery that consisted of two sequential fixed ratios. When alternative sequences provided two food deliveries per 50 responses, the schedule with the shorter initial fixed-ratio value was consistently preferred. Progressively reducing from 1.0 to .25 the probability of food delivery following completion of the second fixed ratio of the sequence with the shorter initial fixed ratio did not reduce preference for this sequence. Moreover, the sequence with the shorter initial fixed ratio also was preferred when the probability of food delivery following completion of the initial ratio in that sequence was progressively reduced from 1.0 to .5, although preference shifted to the alternative when the probability was reduced to 0. These findings suggest that the length of the initial fixed ratio was a primary determinant of choice. Subsequent manipulations demonstrated, however, that when the initial fixed ratios of the two alternatives were equal, changes in the ratio value and probability of food delivery following completion of the second fixed ratio lawfully affected choice.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3572299      PMCID: PMC1348329          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1987.47-225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  14 in total

1.  Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; D H Loveland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Preference for mixed versus constant delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  R A Cicerone
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Parameters affecting the maintenance of negatively reinforced key pecking.

Authors:  E T Gardner; P Lewis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules: number of component intervals.

Authors:  M C Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Concurrent ratio schedules: Fixed vs. variable response requirements.

Authors:  D P Rider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Preference for mixed- versus fixed-ratio schedules.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Commitment, choice and self-control.

Authors:  H Rachlin; L Green
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Reinforcement of least-frequent sequences of choices.

Authors:  C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Choice for aperiodic versus periodic ratio schedules: A comparison of concurrent and concurrent-chain procedures.

Authors:  D P Rider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Effects of reinforcement magnitude on choice and rate of responding.

Authors:  A J Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.