Literature DB >> 16812127

Concurrent ratio schedules: Fixed vs. variable response requirements.

D P Rider.   

Abstract

Rats were trained on concurrent fixed-ratio variable-ratio or concurrent fixed-ratio mixed-ratio schedules of food reinforcement. The variable-ratio schedule was composed of an arithmetic sequence of 11 ratios that averaged 50; the mixed-ratio schedule consisted of equiprobable ratios of 1 and 99. Fixed-ratio values, varied over experimental conditions, included 25, 35, 50, 60, and 99. The proportion of responses and time allocated to the variable- or mixed-ratio schedule increased as the size of the fixed ratio increased. For most subjects, higher proportions of responses and time were maintained on the fixed-ratio schedule at fixed-ratio values of 25 and 35; higher proportions of responses and time were maintained on the variable- or mixed-ratio schedule at fixed-ratio values of 50 or higher. On concurrent variable-ratio fixed-ratio schedules, the tendency for responding to be maintained exclusively by one schedule was related to the difference in local reinforcement rates obtained from those schedules. Exclusive responding was approximated when the difference in local reinforcement rates obtained from those schedules was large; responding was more evenly distributed between the schedules as the difference in the rates at which reinforcement was obtained from each decreased.

Entities:  

Year:  1979        PMID: 16812127      PMCID: PMC1332824          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1979.31-225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  6 in total

1.  SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein; D H Loveland
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Altering the proportion of components in a mixed fixed-ratio schedule.

Authors:  E K Crossman; L T Silverman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Some factors controlling preference between fixed-ratio and variable-ratio schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  J A Sherman; J R Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  6 in total
  10 in total

1.  The effect of rate of reinforcement and time in session on preference for variability.

Authors:  Frances K McSweeney; Benjamin P Kowal; Eric S Murphy
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Unit price and choice in a token-reinforcement context.

Authors:  Theresa A Foster; Timothy D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The matching relation and situation-specific bias modulation in professional football play selection.

Authors:  Stephanie T Stilling; Thomas S Critchfield
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Preference in concurrent variable-interval fixed-ratio schedules.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Concurrent schedules: Effects of time- and response-allocation constraints.

Authors:  M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Local rates of responding and reinforcement during concurrent schedules.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; C L Melville; M A Buck; J E Whipple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Concurrent variable-ratio schedules: Implications for the generalized matching law.

Authors:  J S Macdonall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Choice for aperiodic versus periodic ratio schedules: A comparison of concurrent and concurrent-chain procedures.

Authors:  D P Rider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Choice between sequences of fixed-ratio schedules: effects of ratio values and probability of food delivery.

Authors:  A Poling; E Blakely; V Pellettiere; M Picker
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Stimulus contingency and the malleability of species-typical auditory preferences in Northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) hatchlings.

Authors:  Christopher Harshaw; Isaac P Tourgeman; Robert Lickliter
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.038

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.