Literature DB >> 3571730

A frequency importance function for continuous discourse.

G A Studebaker, C V Pavlovic, R L Sherbecoe.   

Abstract

Normal hearing subjects estimated the intelligibility of continuous discourse (CD) passages spoken by three talkers (two male and one female) under 135 conditions of filtering and signal-to-noise ratio. The relationship between the intelligibility of CD and the articulation index (the transfer function) was different from any found in ANSI S3.5-1969. Also, the lower frequencies were found to be relatively more important for the intelligibility of CD than for identification of nonsense syllables and other types of speech for which data are available except for synthetic sentences [Speaks, J. Speech Hear. Res. 10, 289-298 (1967)]. The frequency which divides the auditory spectrum into two equally important halves (the crossover frequency) was found to be about 0.5 oct lower for the CD used in this study than the crossover frequency for male talkers of nonsense syllables found in ANSI S3.5-1969 and about 0.7 oct lower than the one for combined male and female talkers of nonsense syllables reported by French and Steinberg [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 19, 90-119 (1947)].

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3571730     DOI: 10.1121/1.394633

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  26 in total

1.  Tinnitus Does Not Interfere with Auditory and Speech Perception.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Matthew Richardson; Katie Turner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Priming of lowpass-filtered speech affects response bias, not sensitivity, in a bandwidth discrimination task.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Amanda M Griffin; Neil A Macmillan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Masking release for words in amplitude-modulated noise as a function of modulation rate and task.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lisa N Whittle; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Methods and applications of the audibility index in hearing aid selection and fitting.

Authors:  Amyn M Amlani; Jerry L Punch; Teresa Y C Ching
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2002-09

5.  Listening Comprehension in Middle-Aged Adults.

Authors:  Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.493

6.  The effect of speech material on the band importance function for Mandarin Chinese.

Authors:  Yufan Du; Yi Shen; Xihong Wu; Jing Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  The Effect of Hearing Aid Bandwidth and Configuration of Hearing Loss on Bimodal Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Arlene C Neuman; Annette Zeman; Jonathan Neukam; Binhuan Wang; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Individualized estimation of the Speech Intelligibility Index for short sentences: Test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Donghyeon Yun; Yi Liu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Speech-material and talker effects in speech band importance.

Authors:  Sarah E Yoho; Eric W Healy; Carla L Youngdahl; Tyson S Barrett; Frédéric Apoux
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The development of frequency weighting for speech in children with a history of otitis media with effusion.

Authors:  Rose J Eapen; Emily Buss; John H Grose; Amelia F Drake; Madhu Dev; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.