Literature DB >> 35669020

Clinical Impact of Pelvic Malrotation on Radiograph-Based Preoperative Planning for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Proof-of-Concept and Prudent Prediction of Acceptable Rotation.

Ernest Lourens1, Andrew P Kurmis1, Wan Yin Lim2.   

Abstract

Introduction: Pelvic rotation (PR) on preoperative radiograph templating can affect various critical measured acetabular angles and potentially outcomes of successful total hip arthroplasty (THA). Optimising anatomical reconstruction of the joint is essential to achieve function, longevity and prevention of complications following surgery. There is limited literature that standardises the degree of acceptable PR on radiograph or its effects on the fitting of acetabular prostheses. Objective: This study aimed to develop a proof-of-concept that quantifies how PR can affect various acetabular angles used in pre-operative THA templating and to formulate a practicable method of determining if the preoperative PR is acceptable. Materials and methods: Computerised tomography (CT) models from three control and two THA patients were generated and manipulated in various degrees of PR. CT slices were thickened to simulate radiographs and acetabular angles measured.
Results: The acetabular anteversion distance (AAD) and lateral opening angle (LOA) demonstrated a linear and quadratic relationship with good correlation (R 2 = 0.923, R 2 = 0.710 respectively, p < 0.0001) in relation to PR. Change in area of prosthesis (AOP) demonstrated a good linear correlation (r 2 = 0.774 and r 2 = 0.875, p < 0.0001) with PR. Two novel measurements were used to estimate the degree of PR from a pelvic radiograph; the horizontal distance between pubic symphysis and middle of sacrococcygeal joint (PSSC) and the simplified pelvic rotation ratio (SPRR). A strong correlation between PSSC and SPRR with change in PR was observed (R 2 = 0.970, R 2 = 0.953, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Preliminary result suggests that an SPRR > 2.0 correlates to PR > 20° with potential to have a clinical impact on preoperative measurements. © Crown 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acetabular angle; Arthroplasty; Computerised tomography; Hip; Pelvic; Preoperative planning; Radiograph; Rotation; X-ray

Year:  2022        PMID: 35669020      PMCID: PMC9123151          DOI: 10.1007/s43465-022-00626-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Orthop        ISSN: 0019-5413            Impact factor:   1.033


  26 in total

1.  Pelvic tilt makes acetabular cup navigation inaccurate.

Authors:  Burkhard Lembeck; Otto Mueller; Patrik Reize; Nikolaus Wuelker
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.717

2.  A novel method for accurate and reproducible functional cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Morteza Meftah; Akhilesh Yadav; Anthony C Wong; Amar S Ranawat; Chitranjan S Ranawat
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  The effect of orientation of the acetabular component on outcome following total hip arthroplasty with small diameter hard-on-soft bearings.

Authors:  G Grammatopoulos; G E R Thomas; H Pandit; D J Beard; H S Gill; D W Murray
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  A retrospective study on the relationship between altered native acetabular angle and vertical implant malpositioning.

Authors:  Jorge Rojas; Maria Bautista; Guillermo Bonilla; Omar Amado; Elina Huerfano; Daniel Monsalvo; Adolfo Llinás; José Navas
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties.

Authors:  G E Lewinnek; J L Lewis; R Tarr; C L Compere; J R Zimmerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Pelvic tilt in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: when does it matter?

Authors:  Joseph D Maratt; Christina I Esposito; Alexander S McLawhorn; Seth A Jerabek; Douglas E Padgett; David J Mayman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-10-23       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  The John Charnley Award: risk factors for cup malpositioning: quality improvement through a joint registry at a tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Mark C Callanan; Bryan Jarrett; Charles R Bragdon; David Zurakowski; Harry E Rubash; Andrew A Freiberg; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  Cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  T Scheerlinck
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 0.500

9.  Effect of acetabular cup abduction angle on wear of ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene in hip simulator testing.

Authors:  Laryssa A Korduba; Aaron Essner; Robert Pivec; Perry Lancin; Michael A Mont; Aiguo Wang; Ronald E Delanois
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  2014-10

10.  The best method for evaluating anteversion of the acetabular component after total hip arthroplasty on plain radiographs.

Authors:  Yang Soo Park; Won Chul Shin; Sang Min Lee; Sang Ho Kwak; Jung Yun Bae; Kuen Tak Suh
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.