Literature DB >> 25628277

The effect of orientation of the acetabular component on outcome following total hip arthroplasty with small diameter hard-on-soft bearings.

G Grammatopoulos1, G E R Thomas1, H Pandit1, D J Beard1, H S Gill2, D W Murray1.   

Abstract

We assessed the orientation of the acetabular component in 1070 primary total hip arthroplasties with hard-on-soft, small diameter bearings, aiming to determine the size and site of the target zone that optimises outcome. Outcome measures included complications, dislocations, revisions and ΔOHS (the difference between the Oxford Hip Scores pre-operatively and five years post-operatively). A wide scatter of orientation was observed (2sd 15°). Placing the component within Lewinnek's zone was not associated withimproved outcome. Of the different zone sizes tested (± 5°, ± 10° and ± 15°), only ± 15° was associated with a decreased rate of dislocation. The dislocation rate with acetabular components inside an inclination/anteversion zone of 40°/15° ± 15° was four times lower than those outside. The only zone size associated with statistically significant and clinically important improvement in OHS was ± 5°. The best outcomes (ΔOHS > 26) were achieved with a 45°/25° ± 5° zone. This study demonstrated that with traditional technology surgeons can only reliably achieve a target zone of ±15°. As the optimal zone to diminish the risk of dislocation is also ±15°, surgeons should be able to achieve this. This is the first study to demonstrate that optimal orientation of the acetabular component improves the functional outcome. However, the target zone is small (± 5°) and cannot, with current technology, be consistently achieved. ©2015 The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cup orientation; Dislocation; Hip arthroplasty; OHS; Outcome; acetabular anteversion; acetabular inclination

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25628277     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.34294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  22 in total

1.  Anteroposterior Radiographs Are More Accurate than Cross-Table Lateral Radiographs for Acetabular Anteversion Assessment: a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Peter K Sculco; Alexander S McLawhorn; Kaitlin M Carroll; Benjamin A McArthur; David J Mayman
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-10-19

2.  Can an Augmented Reality Headset Improve Accuracy of Acetabular Cup Orientation in Simulated THA? A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Kartik Logishetty; Luke Western; Ruairidh Morgan; Farhad Iranpour; Justin P Cobb; Edouard Auvinet
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  A retrospective study on the relationship between altered native acetabular angle and vertical implant malpositioning.

Authors:  Jorge Rojas; Maria Bautista; Guillermo Bonilla; Omar Amado; Elina Huerfano; Daniel Monsalvo; Adolfo Llinás; José Navas
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  A new method for intraoperative assessment of leg length, sizing and placement of the components in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Ioannis P Stathopoulos; Nicolaos Andrianopoulos; Dimitrios Paschaloglou; Kalliopi Lampropoulou-Adamidou; Maria Spetsaki; Ioannis K Tsarouchas
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2020-01-02

5.  Clinical Impact of Pelvic Malrotation on Radiograph-Based Preoperative Planning for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Proof-of-Concept and Prudent Prediction of Acceptable Rotation.

Authors:  Ernest Lourens; Andrew P Kurmis; Wan Yin Lim
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 1.033

6.  Defining "Normal" Static and Dynamic Spinopelvic Characteristics: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Jeroen C F Verhaegen; Moritz Innmann; Nuno Alves Batista; Charles-Antoine Dion; Isabel Horton; Jim Pierrepont; Christian Merle; George Grammatopoulos
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2022-07-05

7.  2018 Frank Stinchfield Award: Spinopelvic Hypermobility Is Associated With an Inferior Outcome After THA: Examining the Effect of Spinal Arthrodesis.

Authors:  George Grammatopoulos; Wade Gofton; Zaid Jibri; Matthew Coyle; Johanna Dobransky; Cheryl Kreviazuk; Paul R Kim; Paul E Beaulé
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 8.  [What are the benefits of patient-specific reconstruction in total hip replacement?]

Authors:  Christian Merle; Moritz M Innmann; Fabian Westhauser; Patrick Sadoghi; Tobias Renkawitz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  The area method for measuring acetabular cup anteversion: An accurate and autonomous solution.

Authors:  Michael P Murphy; Cameron J Killen; Steven J Ralles; Nicholas M Brown; Albert J Song; Karen Wu
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-04-14

10.  Influence of surgical approach on component positioning in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Moritz M Innmann; Marcus R Streit; Jeanette Kolb; Jochen Heiland; Dominik Parsch; Peter R Aldinger; Matthias Königshausen; Tobias Gotterbarm; Christian Merle
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.