Literature DB >> 25469569

The Chicago Classification of esophageal motility disorders, v3.0.

P J Kahrilas1, A J Bredenoord, M Fox, C P Gyawali, S Roman, A J P M Smout, J E Pandolfino.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Chicago Classification (CC) of esophageal motility disorders, utilizing an algorithmic scheme to analyze clinical high-resolution manometry (HRM) studies, has gained acceptance worldwide.
METHODS: This 2014 update, CC v3.0, developed by the International HRM Working Group, incorporated the extensive clinical experience and interval publications since the prior (2011) version. KEY
RESULTS: Chicago Classification v3.0 utilizes a hierarchical approach, sequentially prioritizing: (i) disorders of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow (achalasia subtypes I-III and EGJ outflow obstruction), (ii) major disorders of peristalsis (absent contractility, distal esophageal spasm, hypercontractile esophagus), and (iii) minor disorders of peristalsis characterized by impaired bolus transit. EGJ morphology, characterized by the degree of overlap between the lower esophageal sphincter and the crural diaphragm and baseline EGJ contractility are also part of CC v3.0. Compared to the previous CC version, the key metrics of interpretation, the integrated relaxation pressure (IRP), the distal contractile integral (DCI), and the distal latency (DL) remain unchanged, albeit with much more emphasis on DCI for defining both hypo- and hypercontractility. New in CC v3.0 are: (i) the evaluation of the EGJ at rest defined in terms of morphology and contractility, (ii) 'fragmented' contractions (large breaks in the 20-mmHg isobaric contour), (iii) ineffective esophageal motility (IEM), and (iv) several minor adjustments in nomenclature and defining criteria. Absent in CC v3.0 are contractile front velocity and small breaks in the 20-mmHg isobaric contour as defining characteristics. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Chicago Classification v3.0 is an updated analysis scheme for clinical esophageal HRM recordings developed by the International HRM Working Group.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  achalasia; dysphagia; esophageal motility disorders; high-resolution manometry; ineffective esophageal motility

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25469569      PMCID: PMC4308501          DOI: 10.1111/nmo.12477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil        ISSN: 1350-1925            Impact factor:   3.598


  41 in total

1.  Failure to respond to physiologic challenge characterizes esophageal motility in erosive gastro-esophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  C Daum; R Sweis; E Kaufman; A Fuellemann; A Anggiansah; M Fried; M Fox
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Localizing the contractile deceleration point (CDP) in patients with abnormal esophageal pressure topography.

Authors:  Z Lin; J E Pandolfino; Y Xiao; D Carlson; K Bidari; G Escobar; P J Kahrilas
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 3.598

3.  Normal values for esophageal high-resolution manometry.

Authors:  A Bogte; A J Bredenoord; J Oors; P D Siersema; A J P M Smout
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 3.598

4.  Systematic analysis of esophageal pressure topography in high-resolution manometry of 68 normal volunteers.

Authors:  S Niebisch; C L Wilshire; J H Peters
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 3.429

5.  Multiple rapid swallow responses during esophageal high-resolution manometry reflect esophageal body peristaltic reserve.

Authors:  Anisa Shaker; Nathaniel Stoikes; Jesse Drapekin; Vladimir Kushnir; L Michael Brunt; C Prakash Gyawali
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  The effect of a sitting vs supine posture on normative esophageal pressure topography metrics and Chicago Classification diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders.

Authors:  Y Xiao; A Read; F Nicodème; S Roman; P J Kahrilas; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Refining the criterion for an abnormal Integrated Relaxation Pressure in esophageal pressure topography based on the pattern of esophageal contractility using a classification and regression tree model.

Authors:  Zhiyue Lin; P J Kahrilas; S Roman; L Boris; D Carlson; J E Pandolfino
Journal:  Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 3.598

8.  Partial recovery of peristalsis after myotomy for achalasia: more the rule than the exception.

Authors:  Sabine Roman; Peter J Kahrilas; François Mion; Thomas B Nealis; Nathaniel J Soper; Gilles Poncet; Frédéric Nicodème; Eric Hungness; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  High-resolution manometry correlates of ineffective esophageal motility.

Authors:  Yinglian Xiao; Peter J Kahrilas; Mary J Kwasny; Sabine Roman; Zhiyue Lin; Frédéric Nicodème; Chang Lu; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Normative data of high-resolution impedance manometry in the Chinese population.

Authors:  Yinan Shi; Yinglian Xiao; Sui Peng; Jinkun Lin; Lishou Xiong; Minhu Chen
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.029

View more
  493 in total

1.  Pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux in Patients with Chronic Pulmonary Obstructive Disease Is Linked to an Increased Transdiaphragmatic Pressure Gradient and not to a Defective Esophagogastric Barrier.

Authors:  Leonardo M Del Grande; Fernando A M Herbella; Amilcar M Bigatao; Henrique Abrao; Jose R Jardim; Marco G Patti
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Can high resolution manometry parameters for achalasia be obtained by conventional manometry?

Authors:  Fernando Am Herbella; Marco G Patti
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol       Date:  2015-08-15

3.  Peroral endoscopic myotomy is highly effective for achalasia patients with recurrent symptoms after pneumatic dilatation.

Authors:  Madhusudhan R Sanaka; George Khoudari; Malav Parikh; Prashanthi N Thota; Rocio Lopez; Niyati Gupta; Scott Gabbard; Monica Ray; Sudish Murthy; Siva Raja
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Neuronal Control of Esophageal Peristalsis and Its Role in Esophageal Disease.

Authors:  K Nikaki; A Sawada; A Ustaoglu; D Sifrim
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2019-11-23

5.  Hypopharyngeal multichannel intraluminal impedance leads to the promising outcome of antireflux surgery in Japanese population with laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms.

Authors:  Takeshi Suzuki; Yosuke Seki; Yoshitaka Okamoto; Toshitaka Hoppo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  An Overview of Achalasia and Its Subtypes.

Authors:  Dhyanesh A Patel; Brian M Lappas; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2017-07

7.  High-resolution Impedance Manometry after Sleeve Gastrectomy: Increased Intragastric Pressure and Reflux are Frequent Events.

Authors:  François Mion; Salvatore Tolone; Aurélien Garros; Edoardo Savarino; Elise Pelascini; Maud Robert; Gilles Poncet; Pierre-Jean Valette; Sophie Marjoux; Ludovico Docimo; Sabine Roman
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  How to Effectively Use High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry.

Authors:  Dustin A Carlson; Peter J Kahrilas
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 22.682

9.  High-Resolution Impedance Manometry Metrics of the Esophagogastric Junction for the Assessment of Treatment Response in Achalasia.

Authors:  Dustin A Carlson; Zhiyue Lin; Peter J Kahrilas; Joel Sternbach; Eric S Hungness; Nathaniel J Soper; Michelle Balla; Zoe Listernick; Michael Tye; Katherine Ritter; Jenna Craft; Jody D Ciolino; John E Pandolfino
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Intraoperative assessment of esophageal motility using FLIP during myotomy for achalasia.

Authors:  Ryan A J Campagna; Dustin A Carlson; Eric S Hungness; Amy L Holmstrom; John E Pandolfino; Nathaniel J Soper; Ezra N Teitelbaum
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.