Literature DB >> 35641830

Clinical and radiological outcomes following insertion of a novel removable percutaneous interspinous process spacer: an initial experience.

Luca Jacopo Pavan1, Danoob Dalili2,3, Aldo Eros De Vivo4, Arthur Hamel-Senecal5, Federico Torre5, Alexandre Rudel5, Luigi Manfré4, Nicolas Amoretti5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes of a series of patients treated with a removable percutaneous interspinous process spacer (IPS) (LobsterProject® Techlamed®) for symptomatic degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS).
METHODS: All patients treated in two centres with this IPS during 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Procedures were performed under deep sedation or general anaesthesia by two interventional radiologists. Patients were clinically evaluated before intervention and at 3-month follow-up with Visual Analog Scales for pain (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and radiologically with MRI or CT scans. Neural foramina were independently measured for each patient on pre- and post-procedural CT scans by two radiologists.
RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were treated in the selected period of which fifty-eight had complete documentation (mean age 71.2 ± 9.2 years [55-92], 32 males, 26 females). Forty-eight interventions were performed under deep sedation and ten under general anaesthesia, without procedural complications. Clinical follow-up at 3 months showed a significant reduction of pain (VAS from 83 ± 9 to 29 ± 19, - 65%; p < 0.001) and an improvement in functional outcomes (ODI from 31 ± 12 to 13 ± 10%, - 58%; p < 0.001). There was one case of unsatisfactory positioning post procedure, two cases of posterior migration at 3-month follow-up and one case of spinous process fracture. Mean neural foramina area increased from 77 ± 23 to 95 ± 27 mm2 (+ 26%; p < 0.001) with very good inter-observer reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.899).
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous minimally invasive insertion of a removable IPS device demonstrates a favourable safety profile, good clinical outcomes at 3 months, and apparent anatomical increase in foraminal dimensions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05203666-Release Date: 21st January 2022, retrospectively registered.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Intermittent claudication; Interspinous spacer; Interventional radiology; Spinal stenosis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35641830     DOI: 10.1007/s00234-022-02977-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroradiology        ISSN: 0028-3940            Impact factor:   2.995


  20 in total

1.  United States trends in lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions.

Authors:  Richard A Deyo; Darryl T Gray; William Kreuter; Sohail Mirza; Brook I Martin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management?: A prospective 10-year study.

Authors:  T Amundsen; H Weber; H J Nordal; B Magnaes; M Abdelnoor; F Lilleâs
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Neurogenic Claudication: a Review of Current Understanding and Treatment Options.

Authors:  Shadi Messiah; Antony R Tharian; Kenneth D Candido; Nebojsa Nick Knezevic
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2019-03-19

Review 4.  Management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jon Lurie; Christy Tomkins-Lane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-01-04

5.  The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication.

Authors:  Joshua C Richards; Sharmila Majumdar; Derek P Lindsey; Gary S Beaupré; Scott A Yerby
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Midterm Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes after Percutaneous Interspinous Spacer Treatment for Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication.

Authors:  Stefano Marcia; Joshua A Hirsch; Ronil V Chandra; Mariangela Marras; Emanuele Piras; Giovanni Carlo Anselmetti; Mario Muto; Luca Saba
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 3.464

7.  Successful use of percutaneous interspinous spacers and adjunctive spinoplasty in a 9 year cohort of patients.

Authors:  Luigi Manfre; Aldo Eros De Vivo; Hosam Al Qatami; Ahmed Own; Fausto Ventura; Kevin Zhou; Ronil V Chandra; Joshua A Hirsch
Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 5.836

8.  Clinical evaluation of the preliminary safety and effectiveness of a minimally invasive interspinous process device APERIUS(®) in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with symptomatic neurogenic intermittent claudication.

Authors:  Jan Van Meirhaeghe; Patrick Fransen; Daniele Morelli; Niall J A Craig; Gregor Godde; Attila Mihalyi; Frederic Collignon
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Efficacy of epidural injections in the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Alan David Kaye; Kavita Manchikanti; Mark Boswell; Vidyasagar Pampati; Joshua Hirsch
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-02-01

10.  Percutaneous Interspinous Spacer vs Decompression in Patients with Neurogenic Claudication: An Alternative in Selected Patients?

Authors:  Bernhard Meyer; Adad Baranto; Frederic Schils; Frederic Collignon; Bjorn Zoega; Leong Tan; Jean-Charles LeHuec
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.654

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.