Literature DB >> 22565799

Clinical evaluation of the preliminary safety and effectiveness of a minimally invasive interspinous process device APERIUS(®) in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with symptomatic neurogenic intermittent claudication.

Jan Van Meirhaeghe1, Patrick Fransen, Daniele Morelli, Niall J A Craig, Gregor Godde, Attila Mihalyi, Frederic Collignon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: New interspinous process decompression devices (IPDs) provide an alternative to conservative treatment and decompressive surgery for patients with neurogenic intermittent claudication (NIC) due to degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS). APERIUS(®) is a minimally invasive IPD that can be implanted percutaneously. This multicentre prospective study was designed to make a preliminary evaluation of safety and effectiveness of this IPD up to 12 months post-implantation.
METHODS: After percutaneous implantation in 156 patients with NIC due to DLSS, data on symptoms, quality of life, pain, and use of pain medication were obtained for up to 12 months.
RESULTS: Early symptom and physical function improvements were maintained for up to 12 months, when 60 and 58 % of patients maintained an improvement higher than the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) symptom severity and physical function, respectively. Leg, buttock/groin, and back pain were eased throughout, and the use and strength of related pain medication were reduced. Devices were removed from 9 % of patients due to complications or lack of effectiveness.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, in a period of up to 12 months follow-up, the safety and effectiveness of the APERIUS(®) offered a minimally invasive option for the relief of NIC complaints in a high proportion of patients. Further studies are underway to provide insight on outcomes and effectiveness compared to other decompression methods, and to develop guidance on optimal patient selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22565799      PMCID: PMC3508224          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-012-2330-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  18 in total

Review 1.  Degenerative lumbar stenosis: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  A S Hilibrand; N Rand
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 2.  Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D.

Authors:  Stephen J Walters; John E Brazier
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Health-related quality of life assessment by the EuroQol-5D can provide cost-utility data in the field of low-back surgery.

Authors:  Tore K Solberg; Jan-Abel Olsen; Tor Ingebrigtsen; Dag Hofoss; Oystein P Nygaard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Measurement properties of a self-administered outcome measure in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  G Stucki; L Daltroy; M H Liang; S J Lipson; A H Fossel; J N Katz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Treatment of neurogenic claudication by interspinous decompression: application of the X STOP device in patients with lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Paul A Anderson; Cliff B Tribus; Scott H Kitchel
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2006-06

6.  A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results.

Authors:  James F Zucherman; Ken Y Hsu; Charles A Hartjen; Thomas F Mehalic; Dante A Implicito; Michael J Martin; Donald R Johnson; Grant A Skidmore; Paul P Vessa; James W Dwyer; Stephen T Puccio; Joseph C Cauthen; Richard M Ozuna
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Diagnostic value of the history and physical examination.

Authors:  J N Katz; M Dalgas; G Stucki; N P Katz; J Bayley; A H Fossel; L C Chang; S J Lipson
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1995-09

8.  Clinical recording of pressure on the spinal cord and cauda equina. Part 1: the spinal block infusion test: method and clinical studies.

Authors:  B Magnaes
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Dynamic intraspinous spacer technology for posterior stabilization: case-control study on the safety, sagittal angulation, and pain outcome at 1-year follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  K Anthony Kim; Matthew McDonald; Justin H T Pik; Paul Khoueir; Michael Y Wang
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 10.  Effectiveness of interspinous implant surgery in patients with intermittent neurogenic claudication: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wouter A Moojen; Mark P Arts; Ronald H M A Bartels; Wilco C H Jacobs; Wilco C Peul
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-06-11       Impact factor: 3.134

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Aperius interspinous device for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a review.

Authors:  Ashwanth Ramesh; Frank Lyons; Michael Kelleher
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 2.  Interspinous implants: are the new implants better than the last generation? A review.

Authors:  Michael Pintauro; Alexander Duffy; Payman Vahedi; George Rymarczuk; Joshua Heller
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-06

3.  Percutaneous interspinous spacer versus open decompression: a 2-year follow-up of clinical outcome and quality of life.

Authors:  F Beyer; A Yagdiran; P Neu; T Kaulhausen; P Eysel; R Sobottke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Clinical and radiological outcomes following insertion of a novel removable percutaneous interspinous process spacer: an initial experience.

Authors:  Luca Jacopo Pavan; Danoob Dalili; Aldo Eros De Vivo; Arthur Hamel-Senecal; Federico Torre; Alexandre Rudel; Luigi Manfré; Nicolas Amoretti
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 2.995

5.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis treatment with Aperius™ PerCLID™ system and Falena® interspinous spacers: 1-year follow-up of clinical outcome and quality of life.

Authors:  Salvatore Masala; Stefano Marcia; Amedeo Taglieri; Antonio Chiaravalloti; Eros Calabria; Mario Raguso; Emanuele Piras; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 1.610

6.  Long-term results with percutaneous interspinous process devices in the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication.

Authors:  Patrick Fransen
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-12

7.  Anterior and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Supplemental Interspinous Process Fixation: Outcomes from a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study.

Authors:  Ripul Panchal; Ryan Denhaese; Clint Hill; K Brandon Strenge; Alexandre DE Moura; Peter Passias; Paul Arnold; Andrew Cappuccino; M David Dennis; Andy Kranenburg; Brieta Ventimiglia; Kim Martin; Chris Ferry; Sarah Martineck; Camille Moore; Kee Kim
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

Review 8.  Controversies about interspinous process devices in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine diseases: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Roberto Gazzeri; Marcelo Galarza; Alex Alfieri
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Interspinous spacer versus traditional decompressive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ai-Min Wu; Yong Zhou; Qing-Long Li; Xin-Lei Wu; Yong-Long Jin; Peng Luo; Yong-Long Chi; Xiang-Yang Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Percutaneous Interspinous Spacer vs Decompression in Patients with Neurogenic Claudication: An Alternative in Selected Patients?

Authors:  Bernhard Meyer; Adad Baranto; Frederic Schils; Frederic Collignon; Bjorn Zoega; Leong Tan; Jean-Charles LeHuec
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.654

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.