Literature DB >> 26119203

Midterm Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes after Percutaneous Interspinous Spacer Treatment for Neurogenic Intermittent Claudication.

Stefano Marcia1, Joshua A Hirsch2, Ronil V Chandra3, Mariangela Marras4, Emanuele Piras1, Giovanni Carlo Anselmetti4, Mario Muto5, Luca Saba6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the midterm clinical and radiologic outcome of percutaneous interspinous process spacer (IPS) treatment for neurogenic intermittent claudication (NIC) in patients who fail conservative treatment.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with NIC, lumbar spinal stenosis confirmed on magnetic resonance imaging, failure of conservative management for at least 6 months, and treatment with percutaneous IPS were included. Visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were recorded at baseline, 1 month, 1 year and 3 years after treatment. Spinal canal and foraminal cross-sectional areas were calculated from multidetector computed tomography at baseline and 1 year.
RESULTS: There were 80 patients treated with 94 IPS devices; 83% of patients received a single IPS; 78% of IPS devices were placed at L4-L5. An IPS dislocation was the single periprocedural major complication. VAS score of 8.1 ± 2 before treatment was reduced to 4.4 ± 2 at 1 month after treatment (P = .0001); ODI score of 23.3 ± 10 before treatment was reduced to 11.7 ± 8.5 at 1 month after treatment (P = .0001). These significant reductions were durable at 1-year and 3-year follow-up evaluations (P < .01). Spinal canal and foraminal cross-sectional area increased by 15% at 1 year (P = .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NIC who failed conservative treatment and were treated with percutaneous IPS achieved significant gains in pain relief and reduced disability that remained durable at 3-year clinical follow-up evaluation. This outcome was accompanied by significant increases in spinal canal and foraminal cross-sectional areas at the treated level.
Copyright © 2015 SIR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26119203     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2015.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1051-0443            Impact factor:   3.464


  3 in total

1.  Clinical and radiological outcomes following insertion of a novel removable percutaneous interspinous process spacer: an initial experience.

Authors:  Luca Jacopo Pavan; Danoob Dalili; Aldo Eros De Vivo; Arthur Hamel-Senecal; Federico Torre; Alexandre Rudel; Luigi Manfré; Nicolas Amoretti
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 2.995

2.  Axial loading during MRI reveals insufficient effect of percutaneous interspinous implants (Aperius™ PerCLID™) on spinal canal area.

Authors:  Hrafnhildur Hjaltadottir; Hanna Hebelka; Caroline Molinder; Helena Brisby; Adad Baranto
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Decompression Surgery versus Interspinous Devices for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Jennifer Tram; Shanmukha Srinivas; Arvin R Wali; Courtney S Lewis; Martin H Pham
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2020-01-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.