| Literature DB >> 35628948 |
Sarah Christina Reitz1, Ellen Gerhard2, Stella Breuer2, Ferdinand Oliver Bohmann1, Waltraud Pfeilschifter1,3, Joachim Berkefeld2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Until now, thrombectomy studies have provided little reliable information about the correlation between the infarct topography and clinical outcome of acute stroke patients with embolic large-vessel occlusions. Therefore, we aimed to analyze whether infarcts of the corticospinal tracts in the central white matter (CWM) or the internal capsule on postinterventional imaging controls are associated with poor clinical outcome after thrombectomy.Entities:
Keywords: acute stroke; cerebrovascular disease; corticospinal tracts; endovascular recanalization; endovascular treatment
Year: 2022 PMID: 35628948 PMCID: PMC9145944 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11102823
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.964
Figure 1Consort diagram. EVT, endovascular thrombectomy; MCA, middle cerebral artery; TICI, thrombolysis in cerebral infarction.
Figure 2ASPECTS presentation, group definition, and case example for imaging selection criteria: (a) subganglionic nuclei: frontal operculum (M1), anterior temporal lobe (M2), posterior temporal lobe (M3); supraganglionic nuclei: anterior MCA (M4), lateral MCA (M5), posterior MCA (M6); basal ganglia: caudate (C), lentiform nucleus (L), insula (I), internal capsule (IC), central white matter (CWM). Blue colored areas correspond to inclusion criteria: infarct demarcation in the postinterventional imaging in the regions of C, L and CI or CWM (the latter is not represented in the ASPECTS). Red colored areas show eloquent cortical ASPECTS areas with impacts on sensomotoric or language functions (M1 and M3 left; M5 on both sides). Green colored areas show non-eloquent cortical areas (M1 and M3 right; M2, M4, M6 on both sides). Group A: Affection of ASPECTS areas C, L, and CI or CWM plus one green cortical area. Group B: Affection of ASPECTS areas C, L, and CI plus one red cortical area or more than one green cortical area. (b) CT of an 80 years old stroke patient with M1 occlusion on the left side, obtained 24 h after successful thrombectomy to illustrate imaging inclusion criteria of suspected lesion of the corticospinal tract: (i) hypodense infarct demarcation in the left caudate nucleus, basal ganglia, and posterior limb of the internal capsule (arrow); (ii) infarct of the central white matter on the left side above the level of the basal ganglia. The cortical territories of the middle cerebral artery are spared.
Demographic data. Data are presented as numbers (%) or if marked as medians (IQR). NIHSS, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale; EVT, endovascular treatment; IVT, intravenous thrombolysis; TOAST, Trial of ORG 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; TICI, thrombolysis in cerebral infarction; symptom onset to reperfusion: time interval from witnessed symptom onset or last seen well to reperfusion.
| Age (y; mean ± SD) | 71.8 ± 13.20 | 71.4 ± 13.81 | 72.4 ± 12.54 | |
| Male | 32 (45.7) | 17 (42.5) | 15 (50.0) | 0.533 |
| Secondary transferred to EVT | 33 (47.1) | 20 (50.0) | 13 (43.3) | 0.580 |
| IVT | 43 (61.4) | 27 (67.5) | 16 (53.3) | 0.228 |
| Length of stay (d; mean ± SD) | 11.7 ± 8.69 | 12.5 ± 10.07 | 10.7 ± 6.46 | 0.592 |
| 14 (10–18) | 11.5 (9–17) | 16 (12–19) | 0.005 | |
| 0 (0–1) | 0 (0–1) | 0 (0–1) | 0.222 | |
|
| ||||
| Home | 63 (90.0) | 37 (92.5) | 26 (86.7) | 0.420 |
| Nursing at home | 1 (1.4) | 0 (0) | 1 (3.3) | 0.245 |
| Nursing home | 6 (8.6) | 3 (7.5) | 3 (10.0) | 0.712 |
|
| ||||
| Smoking | 10 (14.3) | 6 (15.0) | 4 (13.3) | 0.844 |
| Hypertension | 55 (78.6) | 30 (75.0) | 25 (83.3) | 0.400 |
| Dyslipidemia | 9 (12.9) | 4 (10.0) | 5 (16.7) | 0.410 |
| Diabetes | 11 (15.7) | 6 (15.0) | 5 (16.7) | 0.850 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 44 (62.9) | 28 (70.0) | 16 (53.3) | 0.153 |
|
| ||||
| Large-artery atheroslerosis | 6 (8.6) | 2 (5.0) | 4 (13.4) | 0.218 |
| Cardioembolism | 46 (65.7) | 28 (70.0) | 18 (60.0) | 0.383 |
| Other | 18 (25.7) | 10 (25.0) | 8 (26.6) | 0.776 |
|
| 37 (52.9) | 18 (45.0) | 19 (63.3) | 0.128 |
|
| ||||
| M1 | 58 (82.9) | 32 (80.0) | 26 (86.7) | 0.464 |
| Carotid-T | 12 (17.1) | 8 (20.0) | 4 (13.3) | 0.464 |
|
| ||||
| 2b | 34 (48.6) | 19 (47.5) | 15 (50.0) | 0.856 |
| 2c | 7 (10.0) | 3 (7.5) | 4 (13.3) | 0.421 |
| 3 | 29 (41.4) | 18 (45.0) | 11 (36.7) | 0.484 |
| Symptom onset to endovascular | 10.9 ± 39.71 | 6.2 ± 4.00 | 17.3 ± 60.84 | 0.586 |
| Groin puncture to endovascular | 0.8 ± 0.48 | 0.8 ± 0.48 | 0.8 ± 0.48 | 0.826 |
Figure 3The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 90 days demonstrates a shift toward excellent outcome (mRS 0–1) for patients in group A (n = 40) as compared with group B (n = 30).
Data are presented as numbers (%) or if marked as medians (IQR). NIHSS, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale; mRS, modified Rankin Scale.
|
| ||||
| Home | 21 (30.0) | 14 (35.0) | 7 (23.3) | 0.113 |
| Rehab | 35 (50.0) | 20 (50) | 15 (50.0) | 1.000 |
| Nursing home | 1 (1.4) | 1 (2.5) | 0 (0) | 0.383 |
| Hospital | 6 (8.6) | 2 (5.0) | 4 (13.3) | 0.218 |
| Dead | 7 (10) | 3 (7.5) | 4 (13.3) | 0.421 |
|
| ||||
| Home | 41 (58.6) | 24 (60.0) | 17 (56.7) | 0.779 |
| Nursing at home | 6 (8.6) | 4 (10.0) | 2 (6.65) | 0.622 |
| Nursing home | 5 (7.1) | 4 (10.0) | 1 (3.3) | 0.284 |
| Rehab | 5 (7.1) | 3 (7.5) | 2 (6.65) | 0.893 |
| Hospital | 2 (2.9) | 2 (5.0) | 0 (0) | 0.214 |
| Dead | 11 (15.7) | 3 (7.5) | 8 (26.7) | 0.029 |
|
| ||||
| After 24 h | 8 (3–15) | 4.5 (3–10) | 13 (7–21) | 0.001 |
| At discharge | 2 (0–8) | 1 (0–5) | 5.5 (2–12) | 0.002 |
|
| ||||
| At discharge | 2.5 (1–4) | 1.5 (1–4) | 4 (2–5) | 0.013 |
| After 90 d | 2 (1–4) | 2 (1–4) | 3 (2–6) | 0.021 |
|
| ||||
| Good outcome (mRS 0–2) | 36 (51.4) | 22 (55.0) | 14 (46.7) | 0.581 |
| Excellent outcome (mRS 0–1) | 23 (32.9) | 18 (45.0) | 5 (16.7) | 0.013 |
|
| 3 (4.3) | 0 (0) | 3 (10.0) | 0.052 |