Literature DB >> 15459431

Immediate computed tomography scanning of acute stroke is cost-effective and improves quality of life.

Joanna M Wardlaw1, Janelle Seymour, John Cairns, Sarah Keir, Steff Lewis, Peter Sandercock.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Stroke is very common, but computed tomography (CT) scanning, an expensive and finite resource, is required to differentiate cerebral infarction, hemorrhage, and stroke mimics. We determined whether, and in what circumstances, CT is cost-effective in acute stroke.
METHODS: We developed a decision tree representing acute stroke care pathways populated with data from multiple sources. We determined the effect of diagnostic information from CT scanning on functional outcome, length of stay, costs, and quality of life during 5 years for 13 alternative CT strategies (varying proportions and types of patients and rapidity of scanning).
RESULTS: For 1000 patients aged 70 to 74 years, the policy "scan all strokes within 48 hours" cost 10,279,728 pounds sterling and achieved 1982.3 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The most cost-effective strategy was "scan all immediately" (9,993,676 pounds sterling and 1982.4 QALYs). The least cost-effective was "scan patients on anticoagulants and those in a life-threatening condition immediately and the rest within 14 days" (12,592,666 pounds sterling and 1931.8 QALYs). "Scan no patients" reduced QALYs (1904.2) and increased cost (10,544,000 pounds sterling).
CONCLUSIONS: Immediate CT scanning is the most cost-effective strategy. For the majority of acute stroke patients, increasing independent survival by correct early diagnosis, ensuring appropriate subsequent treatment and management decisions, reduced costs of stroke and increased QALYs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15459431     DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000143453.78005.44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  29 in total

1.  The risk of thrombolysis in "stroke mimics": a case report.

Authors:  Nesrine Knaïssi; Laurent Derex; Tae-Hee Cho; Dominique Marnet; Norbert Nighoghossian
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2010-12-11       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in emergency assessment of patients with suspected acute stroke: a prospective comparison.

Authors:  Julio A Chalela; Chelsea S Kidwell; Lauren M Nentwich; Marie Luby; John A Butman; Andrew M Demchuk; Michael D Hill; Nicholas Patronas; Lawrence Latour; Steven Warach
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-01-27       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Improving the outcome of stroke.

Authors:  Hugh Markus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-08-25

4.  Commentary on NICE guidelines for alteplase for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke.

Authors:  R I Lindley
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  [European Stroke Organisation 2008 guidelines for managing acute cerebral infarction or transient ischemic attack. Part 1].

Authors:  P Ringleb; P D Schellinger; W Hacke
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 6.  Cost-effective diagnostic cardiovascular imaging: when does it provide good value for the money?

Authors:  Hansel J Otero; Frank J Rybicki; Dan Greenberg; Dimitrios Mitsouras; Jorge A Mendoza; Peter J Neumann
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Estimating the payoffs from cardiovascular disease research in Canada: an economic analysis.

Authors:  Claire de Oliveira; Hai V Nguyen; Harindra C Wijeysundera; William W L Wong; Gloria Woo; Paul Grootendorst; Peter P Liu; Murray D Krahn
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2013-07-25

Review 8.  Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Tasneem F Hasan; Nathaniel Todnem; Neethu Gopal; David A Miller; Sukhwinder S Sandhu; Josephine F Huang; Rabih G Tawk
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Liquid biopsy markers for stroke diagnosis.

Authors:  Harshani Wijerathne; Malgorzata A Witek; Alison E Baird; Steven A Soper
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2020-07-05       Impact factor: 5.225

Review 10.  Modeling stroke management: a qualitative review of cost-effectiveness analyses.

Authors:  Chantal Guilhaume; Delphine Saragoussi; John Cochran; Clément François; Mondher Toumi
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2010-03-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.