BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown motor impairment after a stroke relates to lesion size and location, but unexplained variability in recovery still exists. In this study, we used lesion-mapping techniques in combination with diffusion tensor imaging to quantitatively test the hypothesis that motor recovery in patients with chronic stroke is inversely related to the proportion of the corticospinal tract (CST) affected by the lesion. METHODS: We studied 50 patients with chronic stroke, all of whom presented with moderate to severe motor impairments in the acute stage, using high-resolution anatomic MRI. We evaluated the degree of motor impairment with the Upper Extremity module of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment. To analyze the relationship between CST damage and impairment scores, we calculated a CST-lesion load for each patient by overlaying the patient's lesion map with a probabilistic tract derived from diffusion tensor images of age-matched healthy subjects. RESULTS: CST-lesion load was a significant predictor of motor deficit. Infarct size, despite correlating with motor scores, did not significantly predict impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show the degree of functional motor deficit after a stroke is highly dependent on the overlap of the lesion with the CST and not lesion size per se. In the future, automated calculation of CST-lesion load may allow more precise prediction of motor impairment after stroke.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous studies have shown motor impairment after a stroke relates to lesion size and location, but unexplained variability in recovery still exists. In this study, we used lesion-mapping techniques in combination with diffusion tensor imaging to quantitatively test the hypothesis that motor recovery in patients with chronic stroke is inversely related to the proportion of the corticospinal tract (CST) affected by the lesion. METHODS: We studied 50 patients with chronic stroke, all of whom presented with moderate to severe motor impairments in the acute stage, using high-resolution anatomic MRI. We evaluated the degree of motor impairment with the Upper Extremity module of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment. To analyze the relationship between CST damage and impairment scores, we calculated a CST-lesion load for each patient by overlaying the patient's lesion map with a probabilistic tract derived from diffusion tensor images of age-matched healthy subjects. RESULTS: CST-lesion load was a significant predictor of motor deficit. Infarct size, despite correlating with motor scores, did not significantly predict impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show the degree of functional motor deficit after a stroke is highly dependent on the overlap of the lesion with the CST and not lesion size per se. In the future, automated calculation of CST-lesion load may allow more precise prediction of motor impairment after stroke.
Authors: Elizabeth Bates; Stephen M Wilson; Ayse Pinar Saygin; Frederic Dick; Martin I Sereno; Robert T Knight; Nina F Dronkers Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Setsu Wakana; Hangyi Jiang; Lidia M Nagae-Poetscher; Peter C M van Zijl; Susumu Mori Journal: Radiology Date: 2003-11-26 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: H Dawes; C Enzinger; H Johansen-Berg; M Bogdanovic; C Guy; J Collett; H Izadi; C Stagg; D Wade; P M Matthews Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2007-12-21 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: J P Mohr; M A Foulkes; A T Polis; D B Hier; C S Kase; T R Price; T K Tatemichi; P A Wolf Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 1993-04 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Påvel G Lindberg; Pernille H B Skejø; Elisabeth Rounis; Zoltan Nagy; Christina Schmitz; Helena Wernegren; Annika Bring; Margareta Engardt; Hans Forssberg; Jörgen Borg Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2007-05-16 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Eugenio Abela; John Missimer; Roland Wiest; Andrea Federspiel; Christian Hess; Matthias Sturzenegger; Bruno Weder Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-02-20 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Yin-Liang Lin; Kelsey A Potter-Baker; David A Cunningham; Manshi Li; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; John Lee; Stephen Jones; Ken Sakaie; Xiaofeng Wang; Andre G Machado; Ela B Plow Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2020-07-03 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Andre G Machado; Adriana B Conforto; Kelsey A Potter-Baker; David A Cunningham; Nicole M Varnerin; Xiaofeng Wang; Ken Sakaie; Ela B Plow Journal: Clin Neurophysiol Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Claudio L Ferre; Jason B Carmel; Véronique H Flamand; Andrew M Gordon; Kathleen M Friel Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2020-01-26 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Kelsi K Hirai; Benjamin N Groisser; William A Copen; Aneesh B Singhal; Judith D Schaechter Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2015-09-16 Impact factor: 2.390
Authors: Stephen E Nadeau; Bruce Dobkin; Samuel S Wu; Qinglin Pei; Pamela W Duncan Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Wuwei Feng; Jasmine Wang; Pratik Y Chhatbar; Christopher Doughty; Douglas Landsittel; Vasileios-Arsenios Lioutas; Steven A Kautz; Gottfried Schlaug Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2015-10-31 Impact factor: 10.422