| Literature DB >> 32736621 |
Zhongyu Ren1, Jianhua Cao2, Yingke Li2, Peng Cheng2,3, Bing Cao4, Zongji Hao2, Hui Yao2, Dongzhe Shi5, Bin Liu2, Chang Chen5, Guang Yang6, Li Peng2, Liya Guo2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Increased physical activity level is related to lower risk of depressive symptoms, and there is an inverse association between muscle strength and risk of depressive symptoms among the elderly. Although there is evidence of an inverse association between muscle strength and depressive symptoms, the relationship between these variables in a younger population is still unknown. This study aimed to examine the association between handgrip strength, a representative indicator of skeletal muscle strength, and the risk of depressive symptoms among Chinese female college freshmen.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese college freshman; Depressive symptoms; Handgrip strength; Muscular strength
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32736621 PMCID: PMC7395416 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03478-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Participants’ characteristics according to tertiles of relative handgrip strengtha
| Tertile 1 (low) ( | Tertile 2 ( | Tertile 3 (high) (n = 292) | P for trendb | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (kg/kg) | 0.45 | 0.54 | 0.64 | – |
| Age, years | 18.6 (18.5, 18.7) | 18.6 (18.5, 18.7) | 18.7 (18.6, 18.8) | 0.278 |
| BMI, Kg/m2 | 21.6 (21.3, 21.9) | 20.0 (19.7, 20.2) | 19.0 (18.8, 19.2) | < 0.001 |
| Smoking status, % | ||||
| Occasionally | 5.6 (2.9, 8.3) | 5.2 (2.6, 7.8) | 3.4 (1.3, 5.5) | 0.425 |
| Regularly | 0.3 (−0.3, 1.0) | 0.3 (−0.3, 1.0) | 0.3 (−0.3, 1.0) | 1.000 |
| Drinking status, % | ||||
| Occasionally | 55.9 (50.2, 61.7) | 46.4 (40.6, 52.2) | 48.6 (42.9, 54.4) | 0.056 |
| Regularly | 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) | 1.7 (0.2, 3.2) | 1.4 (0.0, 2.7) | 0.097 |
| Tertile of physical activity, % | ||||
| Middle (range 28.43–58.50 MET·h·week-1) | 32.2 (26.7, 37.6) | 34.3 (28.8, 39.8) | 33.6 (28.1, 39.0) | 0.864 |
| High (range>58.50 MET·h·week-1) | 36.0 (30.4, 41.6) | 31.1 (25.8, 36.5) | 33.2 (27.8, 38.7) | 0.463 |
| Sleep duration (6–8 h), % | 88.0 (84.0, 92.0) | 91.0 (88.0, 94.0) | 90.0 (87.0, 94.0) | 0.480 |
| Sleep quality (good), % | 75.2 (70.1, 80.2) | 74.7 (69.7, 79.8) | 77.1 (72.2, 81.9) | 0.788 |
| Race, % | ||||
| Han nationality | 86.0 (82.0, 90.1) | 87.2 (83.3, 91.1) | 89.4 (85.8, 92.9) | 0.461 |
| Tujia nationality | 9.4 (6.0, 12.9) | 7.3 (4.3, 10.3) | 6.5 (3.7, 9.4) | 0.393 |
| Miao nationality | 2.8 (0.9, 4.7) | 3.5 (1.3, 5.6) | 1.7 (0.2, 3.2) | 0.417 |
| Father education level, % | ||||
| senior high school or below | 93.4 (90.5, 96.3) | 92.0 (88.9, 95.2) | 92.8 (89.8, 95.8) | 0.831 |
| college | 6.3 (3.5, 9.1) | 8.0 (4.8, 11.1) | 6.9 (3.9, 9.8) | 0.730 |
| Mother education level, % | ||||
| Senior high school or below | 95.5 (93.0, 97.9) | 95.2 (92.7, 97.7) | 96.6 (94.5, 98.7) | 0.672 |
| College | 4.6 (2.1, 7.0) | 4.8 (2.4, 7.3) | 3.4 (1.3, 5.5) | 0.672 |
| Parent’s marital status, % | ||||
| Widowed | 3.9 (1.6, 6.1) | 4.8 (2.4, 7.3) | 2.4 (0.6, 4.2) | 0.291 |
| Divorced | 14.7 (10.6, 18.8) | 13.5 (9.5, 17.5) | 10.3 (6.8, 13.8) | 0.259 |
| Only one child, % | 27.6 (22.4, 32.8) | 26.6 (21.5, 31.8) | 21.6 (16.8, 26.3) | 0.199 |
| SDS scores | 40.2 (39.3, 41.1) | 39.6 (38.7, 40.4) | 38.6 (37.8, 39.5) | 0.014 |
PA physical activity, BMI body mass index, MET metabolic equivalent, SDS self-rating depression scale
aContinuous variable without a normal distribution were log-transformed; Continuous variables are expressed as estimated geometric means (95%CI) and categorical variables are expressed as percentages (95%CI)
bLinear trends were assessed using analysis of variance for continuous variables and categorical variables
Adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) of associations of relative handgrip strength with depressive symptoms (SDS ≥ 50) among Chinese female college students
| Number of Case | Model 1 a | Model 2 b | Model 3 c | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tertile 1 (n = 286) | 42 | 1.000 (reference) d | 1.000 (reference) | 1.000 (reference) |
| Tertile 2 ( | 28 | 0.623 (0.375, 1.037) | 0.629 (0.371, 1.068) | 0.614 (0.353, 1.069) |
| Tertile 3 ( | 23 | 0.497 (0.290, 0.850) | 0.508 (0.283, 0.913) | 0.537 (0.292, 0.988) |
| P for trend e | – | 0.009 | 0.021 | 0.041 |
aModel 1 are a crude univariate model;
bModel 2 adjusted for age (continuous variable), BMI (continuous variable);
c Model 3 additionally adjusted for race (han nationality, tujia nationality, miao nationality and other nationality), only one child (yes or no), father education (senior high school or below, college and postgraduate), mother education (senior high school or below, college and postgraduate), smoking status (never, occasionally, or regularly), drinking status (never, occasionally, or regularly), physical activity level (low, middle, and high), sleep quality (good or not), sleep duration (6-8 h/d or <6 and >8 h/d) and parent’s marital status (married, widowed and divorced)
dAdjusted data are expressed as odds ratio (95% confidence intervals)
ep for trend were obtained using multivariate logistic regression analyses