| Literature DB >> 35611183 |
Patrick P Edger1,2, Massimo Iorizzo3,4, Nahla V Bassil5, Juliana Benevenuto6, Luis Felipe V Ferrão6, Lara Giongo7, Kim Hummer5, Lovely Mae F Lawas8, Courtney P Leisner8, Changying Li9, Patricio R Munoz6, Hamid Ashrafi4, Amaya Atucha10, Ebrahiem M Babiker11, Elizabeth Canales12, David Chagné13, Lisa DeVetter14, Mark Ehlenfeldt15, Richard V Espley13, Karina Gallardo16, Catrin S Günther13, Michael Hardigan17, Amanda M Hulse-Kemp18,19, MacKenzie Jacobs1,20, Mary Ann Lila3, Claire Luby17, Dorrie Main21, Molla F Mengist3,4, Gregory L Owens22, Penelope Perkins-Veazie4, James Polashock15, Marti Pottorff3, Lisa J Rowland23, Charles A Sims24, Guo-Qing Song25, Jessica Spencer4, Nicholi Vorsa15, Alan E Yocca26, Juan Zalapa27.
Abstract
The genus Vaccinium L. (Ericaceae) contains a wide diversity of culturally and economically important berry crop species. Consumer demand and scientific research in blueberry (Vaccinium spp.) and cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon) have increased worldwide over the crops' relatively short domestication history (~100 years). Other species, including bilberry (Vaccinium myrtillus), lingonberry (Vaccinium vitis-idaea), and ohelo berry (Vaccinium reticulatum) are largely still harvested from the wild but with crop improvement efforts underway. Here, we present a review article on these Vaccinium berry crops on topics that span taxonomy to genetics and genomics to breeding. We highlight the accomplishments made thus far for each of these crops, along their journey from the wild, and propose research areas and questions that will require investments by the community over the coming decades to guide future crop improvement efforts. New tools and resources are needed to underpin the development of superior cultivars that are not only more resilient to various environmental stresses and higher yielding, but also produce fruit that continue to meet a variety of consumer preferences, including fruit quality and health related traits.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35611183 PMCID: PMC9123236 DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhac083
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hortic Res ISSN: 2052-7276 Impact factor: 7.291
Figure 1An illustration of A) lingonberry, B) blueberry, C) bilberry and D) cranberry by the artist Arevka.
Quality standards recommended for blueberry fruit originally reported by Beaudry (1992) [107] and adapted by Retamales and Hancock (2018) [122] with the range heritability (h) values compiled from multiple blueberry studies [107, 122]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 2.25–4.25 | 3–4 | 0.35–0.50 | [ |
| SS | >10% | > 11% | 0.35–0.65 | [ |
| SS:TTA | 10–33 | 15–30 | ||
| Firmness | >70 g | >200 g | 0.40–0.70 | [ |
| Size | >10 mm | >15 mm | 0.14–0.65 | [ |
| Color | Blue | Blue | 0.80 | [ |
| Aroma |
| 0.50–0.80 | [ | |
| Antioxidant | 0.43 | [ | ||
| Total Phenolic | 0.46–0.70 | [ | ||
| Anthocyanin | 0.45–0.80 | [ | ||
| Flavanal | 0.15–0.70 | [ | ||
| Flavonol | 0.15–0.50 | [ | ||
| Phenolic acid | 0.30–0.70 | [ | ||
Populations, markers, and traits mapped in genotype–phenotype association studies in blueberry
| Study | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Association | QTL map | GWAS | GWAS | QTL map | QTL map | QTL map |
| Blueberry type | Wild diploid species | SHB | SHB | SHB | Wild diploid species | SHB |
| Population | Biparental pseudo backcross | 117 full-sib families | 92 full-sib families | Biparental outcrossing F1 | Biparental pseudo backcross | Biparental outcrossing F1 |
| # Individuals | 95 | 1,559 | 886 | 236 | 117 | 287 |
| #Markers | 265 | 80,591 | 71,487 | 11,292 | 17,486 | 17,438 |
| # Traits | 2 | 8 | 17 | 5 | 18 | 4 |
| Traits | Climatic adaptation | Fruit quality and yield | Flavor-related volatiles | Machine-harvesting related traits | Climatic, fruit quality, developmental | Fruit quality |
Figure 2QTLs identified in blueberry through GWAS and QTL mapping studies. Chromosomes represent the largest homologous set of the “Draper” genome [46]. Significant genomic regions from studies using a distinct reference genome were re-assigned using BLAST. Markers on chromosomes represent the central position of the QTL region. The percentage of the phenotypic variance explained by QTLs were estimated based on different methodologies according to the papers referenced in the figure.
Populations, markers, and traits mapped in genotype–phenotype association studies in blueberry
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTL map | Wild diploid species | Biparental pseudo backcross | 95 | 265 | 2 | Climatic adaptation | [ |
| GWAS | SHB | 117 full-sib families | 1,559 | 80,591 | 8 | Fruit quality and yield | [ |
| GWAS | SHB | 92 full-sib families | 886 | 71,487 | 17 | Flavor-related volatiles | [ |
| QTL map | SHB | Biparental outcrossing F1 | 236 | 11,292 | 5 | Machine harvesting related traits | [ |
| QTL map | Wild diploid species | Biparental pseudo backcross | 117 | 17,486 | 18 | Climatic adaptation, fruit quality, development | [ |
| QTL map | SHB | Biparental outcrossing F1 | 287 | 17,438 | 4 | Fruit quality | [ |
SHB: Southern highbush blueberry