| Literature DB >> 24927653 |
James Polashock1, Ehud Zelzion, Diego Fajardo, Juan Zalapa, Laura Georgi, Debashish Bhattacharya, Nicholi Vorsa.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The American cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.) is one of only three widely-cultivated fruit crops native to North America- the other two are blueberry (Vaccinium spp.) and native grape (Vitis spp.). In terms of taxonomy, cranberries are in the core Ericales, an order for which genome sequence data are currently lacking. In addition, cranberries produce a host of important polyphenolic secondary compounds, some of which are beneficial to human health. Whereas next-generation sequencing technology is allowing the advancement of whole-genome sequencing, one major obstacle to the successful assembly from short-read sequence data of complex diploid (and higher ploidy) organisms is heterozygosity. Cranberry has the advantage of being diploid (2n = 2x = 24) and self-fertile. To minimize the issue of heterozygosity, we sequenced the genome of a fifth-generation inbred genotype (F ≥ 0.97) derived from five generations of selfing originating from the cultivar Ben Lear.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24927653 PMCID: PMC4076063 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-14-165
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Transposable elements in the cranberry genome
| | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39.53 | 14.80 | 42.40 | 21.50 | 18.50 | 39.60 | 24.10 | 84.20 | |
| 10.14 | 6.9 | 37.6 | 19.4 | 7.5 | 25.9 | 12.16 | 75.60 | |
| LTR/Copia | 3.50 | - | 5.5 | 4.8 | 1.4 | 2.5 | 10.43 | 23.70 |
| LTR/Gypsy | 3.72 | - | 25.2 | 14.0 | 5.2 | 12.0 | 46.40 | |
| SINE | 0.45 | - | - | - | - | 0.5 | 0.01 | - |
| LINE | 2.20 | - | 6.5 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 1.74 | 1.00 |
| Others | 0.27 | - | 0.4 | - | - | - | - | - |
| Unclassified | - | - | - | - | - | 10.1 | 11.64 | 4.50 |
| 5.34 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 11.0 | 13.7 | 1.24 | 8.60 | |
| Hobo-Activator | 2.51 | - | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.5 | - | 1.1 |
| Tc1-IS630-Pogo | 0.10 | - | - | - | 0.1 | - | - | - |
| Tourist/Harbinger | 0.25 | - | - | - | 0.2 | 1.5 | - | 1.0 |
| Others | 2.48 | - | 0.6 | 0.6 | 9.9 | 7.4 | - | 6.5 |
| Unclassified | | - | - | - | 0.5 | 4.3 | - | - |
| 24.04 | 7.1 | 3.9 | 0.7 | - | - | - | - |
The percent of the genome for each type are shown relative to other selected plant species.
Figure 1Multi-gene phylogenetic tree of cranberry and 18 other plant species. This maximum likelihood (RAxML) tree was built using two plastid (atpB, rbcL) and one mitochondrial (matR) gene sequences which were concatenated and aligned, using MUSCLE (EMBL-EBI), with those of 18 other plant species including Rosids, Asterids, monocots and a basal eudicot. The results of 100 bootstrap replicates are shown at the nodes of this unrooted phylogeny. Branch lengths are proportional to divergence (see scale).
Figure 2Microsatellite (Simple Sequence Repeat; SSR) markers. Occurrence and distribution in the cranberry genome and unigene (transcriptome) sequences.
SNP comparison between ‘Ben Lear’ and inbred accession CNJ99-125-1
| Deletion | 3166 | 2250 |
| Insertion | 763 | 421 |
| MNV | 790 | 541 |
| SNV | 21084 | 16968 |
| 25803 | 20180 |
MNV = Multi-Nucleotide Variants, SNV = Single-Nucleotide Variants.
Figure 3Transport proteins in thepredicted proteins data set. Classification was done using 6099 membrane transport protein sequences downloaded from The Transporter Classification Database (TCDB). Shown are the percentages of total for each type (family or superfamily) listed in the legend in order from most to least abundant.
The relative numbers of transporters in each family
| Plant plasmodesmata (PPD) family. | 34.96% | 28.29% | 6.67% |
| Major facilitator superfamily (MFS). | 4.51% | 2.46% | 2.05% |
| Proton-dependent oligopeptide tranporter (POT) family. | 3.03% | 1.76% | 1.26% |
| Mitochondrial carrier (MC) family. | 2.90% | 1.88% | 1.02% |
| Major intrinsic protein (MIP) family. | 1.79% | 0.98% | 0.81% |
| Nuclear mRNA exporter (mRNA-E) family. | 2.47% | 1.68% | 0.79% |
| Cation channel-forming heat shock protein-70 (Hsp70) family. | 1.48% | 0.75% | 0.73% |
| Proposed fatty acid transporter (FAT) family. | 1.67% | 0.95% | 0.71% |
| Monovalent cation:proton antiporter-2 (CPA2) family. | 1.30% | 0.61% | 0.69% |
| Amino acid/auxin permease (AAAP) family. | 2.35% | 1.82% | 0.53% |
| Multidrug/oligosaccharidyl-lipid/polysaccharide (MOP) flippase superfamily. | 2.47% | 1.99% | 0.48% |
| Plant photosystem I supercomplex (PSI) family. | 1.36% | 0.95% | 0.41% |
| Voltage-gated ion channel (VIC) superfamily. | 1.79% | 1.42% | 0.38% |
| Chloroplast envelope protein translocase (CEPT or tic-Toc) family. | 1.11% | 0.98% | 0.13% |
| P-type ATPase (P-ATPase) superfamily. | 2.35% | 2.22% | 0.12% |
| Glutamate-gated ion channel (GIC) family of neurotransmitter receptors. | 1.05% | 1.04% | 0.01% |
| Drug/metabolite transporter (DMT) superfamily. | 3.09% | 3.18% | −0.09% |
| H + -or Na + -translocating F-type, V-type and A-type ATPase (F-ATPase) superfamily. | 1.11% | 1.36% | −0.25% |
| H + -or Na + -translocating NADH dehydrogenase (NDH) family. | 1.11% | 1.44% | −0.33% |
| Iron/lead transporter (ILT) superfamily. | 1.54% | 2.22% | −0.68% |
| ATP-binding cassette (ABC) superfamily. | 4.76% | 5.46% | −0.70% |
| Nuclear pore complex (NPC) family. | 0.43% | 1.39% | −0.95% |
| Nuclear t-RNA exporter (t-Exporter) family. | 0.25% | 1.42% | −1.17% |
| Endoplasmic reticular retrotranslocon (ER-RT) family. | 0.49% | 1.79% | −1.30% |
| Transient receptor potential Ca2+ channel (TRP-CC) family. | 0% | 1.59% | −1.59% |
| Peroxisomal protein importer (PPI) family. | 1.54% | 6.39% | −4.84% |
Percent shown is based on the total number found in each species.
The difference is between Cranberry vs. Grape.
Transcription factors
| MYB | 119 | 428 | 263 | 275 | 252 |
| bHLH | 79 | 244 | 172 | 116 | 196 |
| AP2-EREBP | 74 | 274 | 166 | 145 | 188 |
| C3H | 70 | 148 | 83 | 54 | 109 |
| C2H2 | 68 | 313 | 107 | 129 | 124 |
| Orphans | 53 | 136 | 86 | 140 | 216 |
| PHD | 52 | 127 | 55 | 70 | 61 |
| HB | 51 | 169 | 105 | 75 | 137 |
| NAC | 41 | 261 | 120 | 81 | 146 |
| bZIP | 37 | 107 | 110 | 50 | 127 |
| SNF2 | 33 | 64 | 43 | 35 | 48 |
| WRKY | 32 | 145 | 85 | 64 | 119 |
| GNAT | 29 | n.d. | 41 | 32 | 45 |
| SET | 29 | 68 | 46 | 45 | 34 |
| mTERF | 26 | n.d. | 36 | 21 | 29 |
| CCAAT | 25 | 193 | 72 | 87 | 69 |
| GRAS | 25 | 121 | 36 | 51 | 63 |
| Trihelix | 23 | 27 | 27 | 62 | 26 |
| TRAF | 22 | n.d. | 29 | 19 | 90 |
| ABI3VP1 | 21 | 80 | 59 | 36 | 60 |
| G2-like | 20 | 19 | 53 | 35 | 57 |
| C2C2-Dof | 19 | 58 | 44 | 24 | 36 |
| FAR1 | 19 | n.d. | 24 | 42 | 129 |
| LOB | 19 | n.d. | 49 | 45 | 43 |
| FHA | 17 | 34 | 19 | 13 | 22 |
| MADS | 17 | 152 | 124 | 65 | 87 |
| C2C2-GATA | 16 | 39 | 37 | 24 | 37 |
| AUX/IAA | 15 | 52 | 35 | 24 | 52 |
| TCP | 15 | 58 | 30 | 18 | 25 |
| SBP | 14 | 42 | 28 | 19 | 29 |
| ARF | 12 | 37 | 35 | 19 | 49 |
| HSF | 12 | 56 | 24 | 20 | 40 |
| OFP | 12 | n.d. | 18 | 11 | 30 |
| BSD | 10 | n.d. | 12 | 7 | 8 |
| HMG | 9 | 23 | 21 | 12 | 20 |
| RWP-RK | 9 | 14 | 16 | 7 | 14 |
| Jumonji | 8 | 29 | 20 | 19 | 17 |
| SWI/SNF-BAF60b | 8 | n.d. | 17 | 14 | 10 |
| Transcription Factors | |||||
| ARID | 7 | n.d. | 11 | 10 | 6 |
| ARR-B | 7 | 16 | 17 | 29 | 12 |
| C2C2-CO-like | 7 | 17 | 21 | 6 | 24 |
| Sigma70-like | 7 | n.d. | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Tify | 7 | n.d. | 26 | 11 | 16 |
| BES1 | 6 | 24 | 14 | 9 | 6 |
| E2F-DP | 6 | 15 | 14 | 7 | 12 |
| TAZ | 6 | n.d. | 8 | 3 | 2 |
| TUB | 6 | 21 | 15 | 11 | 26 |
| CAMTA | 5 | n.d. | 9 | 4 | 7 |
| GeBP | 5 | 13 | 20 | 3 | 6 |
| SWI/SNF-SWI3 | 5 | n.d. | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| zf-HD | 5 | 29 | 18 | 17 | 15 |
| BBR/BPC | 4 | 6 | 16 | 3 | 9 |
| DDT | 4 | n.d. | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| GRF | 4 | n.d. | 9 | 7 | 13 |
| HRT | 4 | n.d. | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| LUG | 4 | n.d. | 7 | 3 | 7 |
| Pseudo | 4 | n.d. | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| CSD | 3 | n.d. | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| Alfin-like | 2 | n.d. | 9 | 6 | 9 |
| Coactivator | 2 | n.d. | 7 | 2 | 2 |
| CPP | 2 | n.d. | 9 | 6 | 11 |
| DBP | 2 | n.d. | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| LIM | 2 | n.d. | 10 | 5 | 6 |
| PBF-2-like | 2 | n.d. | 4 | 2 | 2 |
| PLATZ | 2 | n.d. | 14 | 9 | 15 |
| SRS | 2 | 8 | 13 | 6 | 6 |
| C2C2-YABBY | 1 | n.d. | 8 | 7 | 7 |
| EIL | 1 | n.d. | 6 | 4 | 8 |
| IWS1 | 1 | n.d. | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| LFY | 1 | n.d. | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MBF1 | 1 | n.d. | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| MED6 | 1 | n.d. | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| RB | 1 | n.d. | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Rcd1-like | 1 | n.d. | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| SAP | 1 | n.d. | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| SOH1 | 1 | n.d. | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| TIG | 1 | n.d. | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| ULT | 1 | n.d. | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| VOZ | 1 | n.d. | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| ZIM | 0 | 0 | 23 | 0 | 23 |
The numbers found in cranberry for each family as compared to other selected species.
Disease resistance (R-genes) found in cranberry
| 55 | 60 | 40 | 402 | 181 | 21 | |
| 2 | 19 | 97 | 0 | 224 | 21 | |
| 6 | 111 | 11 | 74 | 394 | 10 | |
| 289 | 219 | 222 | 394 | 1265 | 161 | |
| 44 | 150 | 91 | 216 | 320 | 110 | |
| Pid2 | 67 | | | | | |
| Pto | 47 | 0 | 1 | 7 | | 25 |
| Lr34 | 11 | | | | | |
| Bs3 | 9 | | | | | |
| Hm1 | 8 | | | | | |
| MLO | 3 | 17 | 19 | 17 | | 15 |
| RTM1 | 3 | | | | | |
| Xa13 | 3 | | | | | |
| Bs3-E | 2 | | | | | |
| ASC1 | 1 | | | | | |
| At1 | 1 | | | | | |
| Hs1pro-1 | 1 | | | | | |
| Hm2 | 1 | | | | | |
| Hm3 | 1 | | | | | |
| IVR | 1 | | | | | |
| 555 | 576 | 481 | 1100 | 2384 | 363 | |
The number found in each class as compared to other selected species.
Figure 4Mitochondrial scaffolds recovered from the cranberry whole-genome assembly. Mapped mitochondrial scaffolds (left) against the previously published mitochondrial genome (right). Different colors represent different scaffolds. Scaffolds colored in black mapped in multiple locations.
Figure 5KEGG reference pathway for flavonoid biosynthesis (map00941). Enzymes colored in pink were found in both cranberry and grape. Those in green were found in grape, but not cranberry. Those uncolored were found in neither cranberry nor grape.