| Literature DB >> 27295982 |
Giovanny Covarrubias-Pazaran1, Luis Diaz-Garcia1,2, Brandon Schlautman1, Joseph Deutsch3, Walter Salazar1, Miguel Hernandez-Ochoa1, Edward Grygleski4, Shawn Steffan5, Massimo Iorizzo6, James Polashock7, Nicholi Vorsa8, Juan Zalapa9,10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The application of genotyping by sequencing (GBS) approaches, combined with data imputation methodologies, is narrowing the genetic knowledge gap between major and understudied, minor crops. GBS is an excellent tool to characterize the genomic structure of recently domesticated (~200 years) and understudied species, such as cranberry (Vaccinium macrocarpon Ait.), by generating large numbers of markers for genomic studies such as genetic mapping.Entities:
Keywords: Genotyping by sequencing; Imputation; Linkage disequilibrium; Pseudo-testcross; Segregation distortion; Synteny; Vaccinium macrocarpon
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27295982 PMCID: PMC4906896 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-016-2802-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1Cranberry parental linkage map genome-wide recombination frequency and linkage disequilibrium patterns. Ordered markers in [BGx(BLxNL)]95 (P1; A) and GH1x35 (P2; B) parental bin maps for the 12 linkage groups containing 1728 and 2021 molecular markers (type ABxAA and AAxAB), comprising 592 and 671 bins respectively, were used to show the computed parsimonious order of the map. The upper triangular region of the matrix (in red palette) shows the linkage disequilibrium (calculated using the r2 metric) whereas the lower triangular shows the recombination between markers (in rainbow palette)
Features of the cranberry integrated (I) and parental bin linkage maps (P1 and P2)
| LG | Length (cM) | Tot.No.Markers | No.SSR | No.SNP | #Bins | Avg.Gap (cM) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | P1 | P2 | I | P1 | P2 | I | P1 | P2 | I | P1 | P2 | P1 | P2 | P1 | P2 | |
| 1 | 107.1 | 138.2 | 123.0 | 542 | 198 | 220 | 14 | 7 | 10 | 528 | 191 | 210 | 73 | 77 | 1.9 | 1.6 |
| 2 | 95.8 | 113.8 | 95.2 | 413 | 192 | 134 | 16 | 10 | 7 | 397 | 182 | 127 | 60 | 49 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| 3 | 100.2 | 120.8 | 90.6 | 357 | 142 | 154 | 15 | 7 | 14 | 342 | 135 | 140 | 50 | 56 | 2.4 | 1.6 |
| 4 | 88.5 | 115.6 | 91.2 | 354 | 138 | 172 | 22 | 16 | 12 | 332 | 122 | 160 | 55 | 61 | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| 5 | 103.8 | 74.0 | 96.1 | 301 | 29 | 244 | 16 | 4 | 15 | 285 | 25 | 229 | 13 | 69 | 5.7 | 1.4 |
| 6 | 97.9 | 131.8 | 91.4 | 421 | 142 | 157 | 12 | 10 | 6 | 409 | 132 | 151 | 53 | 59 | 2.5 | 1.5 |
| 7 | 95.2 | 116.0 | 88.6 | 335 | 136 | 110 | 18 | 11 | 10 | 317 | 125 | 100 | 54 | 40 | 2.1 | 2.2 |
| 8 | 96.7 | 98.0 | 78.0 | 302 | 104 | 111 | 19 | 13 | 8 | 283 | 91 | 103 | 33 | 46 | 3.0 | 1.7 |
| 9 | 78.3 | 112.8 | 99.1 | 473 | 180 | 167 | 19 | 13 | 4 | 454 | 167 | 163 | 48 | 57 | 2.3 | 1.7 |
| 10 | 78.7 | 85.3 | 81.4 | 372 | 122 | 152 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 360 | 114 | 148 | 47 | 38 | 1.8 | 2.1 |
| 11 | 86.0 | 95.5 | 103.1 | 526 | 162 | 229 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 508 | 153 | 220 | 54 | 66 | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 12 | 83.9 | 119.3 | 99.0 | 453 | 183 | 171 | 20 | 15 | 15 | 433 | 168 | 156 | 52 | 53 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
| Totala | 1112.1 | 1321.1 | 1136.7 | 4849 | 1728 | 2021 | 201 | 123 | 114 | 4648 | 1605 | 1907 | 592 | 671 | 2.5 | 1.7 |
Summary of total linkage group lengths, total number of markers, number of SSRs, SNPs, number of bins, and average gap in cM
aSummed across LGs = Length (cM), Tot.No.Markers, No.SSR, No.SNP, #Bins,; Averaged across LGs = Avg.Gap (cM)
Genome-wide features of the cranberry integrated (I) and parental bin maps (P1 and P2)
| LG | No.Dist.Mark | %Dist.Mark | #Rec.Event | LD.decay | No.genes | No.scaff | Mb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | P1 | P2 | I | P1 | P2 | P1 | P2 | P1 | P2 | I | P1 | P2 | I | P1 | P2 | I | P1 | P2 | |
| 1 | 45 | 5 | 30 | 8.3 | 2.5 | 13.6 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 31.7 | 32.1 | 136 | 56 | 76 | 257 | 113 | 131 | 1.4 | 0.5 | 0.7 |
| 2 | 20 | 9 | 7 | 4.8 | 4.7 | 5.2 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 31.9 | 31.0 | 132 | 68 | 58 | 205 | 111 | 85 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| 3 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 2.6 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 33.1 | 32.4 | 96 | 40 | 45 | 183 | 81 | 85 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| 4 | 19 | 3 | 9 | 5.4 | 2.2 | 5.2 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 35.8 | 32.5 | 106 | 36 | 62 | 195 | 89 | 107 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| 5 | 13 | 2 | 10 | 4.3 | 6.9 | 4.1 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 23.0 | 31.3 | 97 | 11 | 65 | 142 | 17 | 128 | 0.8 | 0.1 | 0.6 |
| 6 | 83 | 10 | 60 | 19.7 | 7.0 | 38.2 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 35.0 | 31.2 | 107 | 40 | 49 | 200 | 84 | 84 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| 7 | 65 | 11 | 36 | 19.4 | 8.1 | 32.7 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 32.0 | 31.0 | 88 | 64 | 29 | 162 | 85 | 67 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| 8 | 22 | 4 | 3 | 7.3 | 3.8 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 28.9 | 31.6 | 75 | 32 | 29 | 152 | 60 | 67 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 9 | 60 | 8 | 46 | 12.7 | 4.4 | 27.5 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 32.1 | 31.6 | 108 | 57 | 45 | 226 | 102 | 89 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| 10 | 36 | 7 | 25 | 9.7 | 5.7 | 16.4 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 29.8 | 31.0 | 98 | 43 | 56 | 186 | 70 | 84 | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| 11 | 86 | 8 | 57 | 16.3 | 4.9 | 24.9 | 0.9 | 1.0 | 32.5 | 32.7 | 131 | 51 | 70 | 258 | 98 | 129 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
| 12 | 67 | 10 | 29 | 14.8 | 5.5 | 17.0 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 32.0 | 33.2 | 111 | 59 | 66 | 215 | 109 | 98 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
| Totala | 523 | 80 | 316 | 10.4 | 4.8 | 15.9 | 1.1 | 0.9 | 31.5 | 31.8 | 1285 | 557 | 650 | 2381 | 1019 | 1154 | 12.3 | 5.1 | 5.9 |
Summary of number of distorted markers, percent of distorted markers, number of recombination events, linkage disequilibrium (considered at r 2 = 0.2), and number of genes, scaffolds and Mb anchored
aSummed across LGs = No.Dist.Mark, No.genes, No.scaff, Mb; Averaged across LGs = %Dist.Mark, #Rec.Event, and LD.decay
Fig. 2Cranberry SSR and SNP map homology. Homology between the SSR map (red LGs) developed by Schlautman et al. [44] and the SNP-SSR map (black) depicted by black dotted lines showing the accuracy of locus ordering using the MST and ML algorithms comprising 4849 markers
Fig. 3Cranberry linkage map marker density/depth and genome-wide patterns of segregation distortion. Segregation distortion is plotted as a function of Chi-squared value (y axis) for monogenic marker segregation ratios against marker position on each of the twelve LGs of the integrated map. Uniparental markers for P1 (female is heterozygote) are indicated with pink, uniparental markers for P2 (male is heterozygote) are displayed in light blue, whereas biparental markers (both parents heterozygotes) are shown in gold dots. Dots with red halo indicate markers with Chi-squared values significant at p-values ≤ 0.10. Genetic distances are displayed in cM on the x axis. MD label on the y axis refers to marker density across the linkage group
Fig. 4Synteny analysis. Synteny blocks between cranberry and kiwifruit (left panel) and cranberry and grape (right panel). The 12 cranberry chromosomes are represented in different colors whereas chromosomes for the other species have dark gray color. The distribution of significant BLAST hits between cranberry (ring a, blue histogram) and the other species (ring d, gray histogram) are shown. Ring b (black histogram) shows the SNP marker density in each cranberry LG. In order to visually explore syntenic blocks, the location of each homologous sequence between cranberry (x-axis) and the reference species (y-axis) was plotted in ring c. In this plot, different dot colors were used to differentiate chromosomes in the reference species; those hits that potentially could be syntenic blocks (see Methods), show non-gray color. For example, a section of the LG 10 in cranberry (purple lines) has homology to large portions of chromosomes 4 and 21 in kiwifruit (see blue and orange dots in ring c)
Fig. 5Cranberry SNP-SSR integrated linkage map with putative genes. Genetic map in cM comprised 12 LGs, 4849 markers, anchored 2381 scaffolds and 1285 CDS. Marker density is shown as intensity of gray within the LG bars, along with putative genes annotated in Polashock et al. (2014) displayed as colored squares (see Additional file 3: Table S5)