Literature DB >> 19703223

Demographic source-sink dynamics restrict local adaptation in Elliott's blueberry (Vaccinium elliottii).

Jill T Anderson1, Monica A Geber.   

Abstract

In heterogeneous landscapes, divergent selection can favor the evolution of locally adapted ecotypes, especially when interhabitat gene flow is minimal. However, if habitats differ in size or quality, source-sink dynamics can shape evolutionary trajectories. Upland and bottomland forests of the southeastern USA differ in water table depth, light availability, edaphic conditions, and plant community. We conducted a multiyear reciprocal transplant experiment to test whether Elliott's blueberry (Vaccinium elliottii) is locally adapted to these contrasting environments. Additionally, we exposed seedlings and cuttings to prolonged drought and flooding in the greenhouse to assess fitness responses to abiotic stress. Contrary to predictions of local adaptation, V. elliottii families exhibited significantly higher survivorship and growth in upland than in bottomland forests and under drought than flooded conditions, regardless of habitat of origin. Neutral population differentiation was minimal, suggesting widespread interhabitat migration. Population density, reproductive output, and genetic diversity were all significantly greater in uplands than in bottomlands. These disparities likely result in asymmetric gene flow from uplands to bottomlands. Thus, adaptation to a marginal habitat can be constrained by small populations, limited fitness, and immigration from a benign habitat. Our study highlights the importance of demography and genetic diversity in the evolution of local (mal)adaptation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19703223     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00825.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  7 in total

1.  Theoretical perspectives on the statics and dynamics of species' borders in patchy environments.

Authors:  Robert D Holt; Michael Barfield
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Protected polymorphisms and evolutionary stability of patch-selection strategies in stochastic environments.

Authors:  Steven N Evans; Alexandru Hening; Sebastian J Schreiber
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2014-08-24       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Detecting black bear source-sink dynamics using individual-based genetic graphs.

Authors:  Hope M Draheim; Jennifer A Moore; Dwayne Etter; Scott R Winterstein; Kim T Scribner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  There and back again; historical perspective and future directions for Vaccinium breeding and research studies.

Authors:  Patrick P Edger; Massimo Iorizzo; Nahla V Bassil; Juliana Benevenuto; Luis Felipe V Ferrão; Lara Giongo; Kim Hummer; Lovely Mae F Lawas; Courtney P Leisner; Changying Li; Patricio R Munoz; Hamid Ashrafi; Amaya Atucha; Ebrahiem M Babiker; Elizabeth Canales; David Chagné; Lisa DeVetter; Mark Ehlenfeldt; Richard V Espley; Karina Gallardo; Catrin S Günther; Michael Hardigan; Amanda M Hulse-Kemp; MacKenzie Jacobs; Mary Ann Lila; Claire Luby; Dorrie Main; Molla F Mengist; Gregory L Owens; Penelope Perkins-Veazie; James Polashock; Marti Pottorff; Lisa J Rowland; Charles A Sims; Guo-Qing Song; Jessica Spencer; Nicholi Vorsa; Alan E Yocca; Juan Zalapa
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 7.291

Review 5.  Adaptive evolution: evaluating empirical support for theoretical predictions.

Authors:  Carrie F Olson-Manning; Maggie R Wagner; Thomas Mitchell-Olds
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Strong selection genome-wide enhances fitness trade-offs across environments and episodes of selection.

Authors:  Jill T Anderson; Cheng-Ruei Lee; Thomas Mitchell-Olds
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Predicting local adaptation in fragmented plant populations: implications for restoration genetics.

Authors:  Melinda Pickup; David L Field; David M Rowell; Andrew G Young
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 5.183

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.