| Literature DB >> 35595826 |
Ruibin Bai1, Yanping Wang1, Jingmin Fan1, Jingjing Zhang1, Wen Li1, Yan Zhang2, Fangdi Hu3.
Abstract
Multi-elemental analysis is widely used to identify the geographical origins of plants. The purpose of this study was to explore the feasibility of combining chemometrics with multi-element analysis for classification of Codonopsis Radix from different producing regions of Gansu province (China). A total of 117 Codonopsis Radix samples from 7 counties of Gansu province were collected. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) was used for the determination of 28 elements (39 K, 24 Mg, 44Ca, 27Al, 137Ba, 57Fe, 23Na, 88Sr, 55Mn, 66Zn, 65Cu, 85Rb, 61Ni, 53Cr, 51 V, 7Li, 208Pb, 59Co, 75As, 133Cs, 71 Ga, 77Se, 205Tl, 114Cd, 238U, 107Ag, 4Be and 202Hg). Among macro elements, 39 K showed the highest level, whereas 23Na was found to have the lowest content value. Micro elements showed the concentrations order of: 88Sr > 55Mn > 66Zn > 85Rb > 65Cu. Among trace elements, 53Cr and 61Ni showed higher content and 4Be was not detected in all samples. Intra-regions differentiation was performed by principal component analysis (PCA), cluster analysis (CA) and supervised learning algorithms such as linear discriminant analysis (LDA), k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), support vector machines (SVM), and random forests (RF). Among them, the RF model performed the best with an accuracy rate of 78.79%. Multi-elemental analysis combined with RF was a reliable method to identify the origins of Codonopsis Radix in Gansu province.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35595826 PMCID: PMC9123173 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-12556-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Macro elements content of Codonopsis Radix samples according to their geographical origin (Content are expressed as μg/g of dry matter basis).
| Element | Lintao ( | Weiyuan ( | Longxi ( | Zhang ( | Min ( | Tanchang ( | Wen ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 39 K | 11,000 ± 1700 | 11,000 ± 1400 | 9200 ± 1300 | 8800 ± 1100 | 9600 ± 770 | 11,000 ± 2200 | 14,000 ± 2000 |
| 24 Mg | 1500 ± 130 | 1500 ± 200 | 1500 ± 220 | 1500 ± 220 | 1500 ± 180 | 1500 ± 87 | 1900 ± 190 |
| 44Ca | 330 ± 59 | 370 ± 71 | 330 ± 70 | 290 ± 32 | 310 ± 34 | 340 ± 32 | 580 ± 120 |
| 27Al | 290 ± 120 | 380 ± 280 | 250 ± 120 | 220 ± 28 | 350 ± 83 | 570 ± 170 | 780 ± 340 |
| 137Ba | 250 ± 120 | 240 ± 130 | 140 ± 71 | 87 ± 49 | 110 ± 34 | 290 ± 180 | 370 ± 130 |
| 57Fe | 180 ± 72 | 250 ± 180 | 160 ± 70 | 150 ± 17 | 220 ± 45 | 330 ± 95 | 430 ± 130 |
| 23Na | 170 ± 210 | 190 ± 240 | 190 ± 140 | 180 ± 140 | 110 ± 62 | 140 ± 30 | 160 ± 77 |
Macro elements content of Codonopsis Radix samples according to their geographical origin (Content are expressed as μg/g of dry matter basis).
| Element | Lintao ( | Weiyuan ( | Longxi ( | Zhang ( | Min ( | Tanchang ( | Wen ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88Sr | 49 ± 9 | 61 ± 34 | 56 ± 24 | 28 ± 8 | 26 ± 7 | 26 ± 4 | 65 ± 29 |
| 55Mn | 23 ± 4 | 27 ± 5 | 21 ± 4 | 17 ± 3 | 25 ± 3 | 28 ± 2 | 36 ± 9 |
| 66Zn | 18 ± 4 | 21 ± 8 | 15 ± 3 | 35 ± 8 | 17 ± 2 | 21 ± 5 | 23 ± 4 |
| 65Cu | 5.6 ± 0.7 | 5.3 ± 0.8 | 5.6 ± 1.5 | 4.0 ± 1.3 | 5.4 ± 0.9 | 5.0 ± 0.5 | 6.5 ± 1.2 |
| 85Rb | 5.5 ± 1.6 | 6.9 ± 2.8 | 8.3 ± 3.0 | 6.0 ± 4.0 | 3.4 ± 1.9 | 9.2 ± 2.7 | 8.7 ± 4.2 |
Trace elements content of Codonopsis Radix samples according to their geographical origin (Content are expressed as μg/g of dry matter basis).
| Element | Lintao ( | Weiyuan ( | Longxi ( | Zhang ( | Min ( | Tanchang ( | Wen ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 61Ni | 0.9 ± 0.4 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 1.3 | 0.9 ± 0.4 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.05 | 1.4 ± 0.5 |
| 53Cr | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 1.1 | 1.3 ± 1.4 | 0.5 ± 0.4 | 1.7 ± 0.6 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.6 |
| 51 V | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.4 | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 0.3 ± 0.04 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 1.6 ± 1 |
| 7Li | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.2 | 0.2 ± 0.08 | 0.2 ± 0.03 | 0.2 ± 0.06 | 0.3 ± 0.2 | 0.6 ± 0.3 |
| 208Pb | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.08 | 0.2 ± 0.03 | 0.3 ± 0.05 | 0.3 ± 0.07 | 0.4 ± 0.08 |
| 59Co | 0.1 ± 0.03 | 0.2 ± 0.07 | 0.1 ± 0.03 | 0.1 ± 0.02 | 0.1 ± 0.01 | 0.2 ± 0.03 | 0.2 ± 0.05 |
| 75As | 0.1 ± 0.05 | 0.2 ± 0.09 | 0.1 ± 0.04 | 0.1 ± 0.02 | 0.2 ± 0.02 | 0.2 ± 0.09 | 0.3 ± 0.08 |
| 133Cs | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.08 ± 0.05 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 0.1 ± 0.03 | 0.2 ± 0.06 |
| 71 Ga | 0.09 ± 0.04 | 0.1 ± 0.09 | 0.08 ± 0.04 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.1 ± 0.03 | 0.2 ± 0.05 | 0.2 ± 0.09 |
| 77Se | 0.1 ± 0.07 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.1 ± 0.07 | 0.09 ± 0.03 | 0.1 ± 0.03 | 0.2 ± 0.06 | 0.3 ± 0.09 |
| 205Tl | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.05 ± 0.02 | 0.04 ± 0.03 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.05 ± 0.03 |
| 114Cd | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.03 ± 0.02 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 0.2 ± 0.1 |
| 238U | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 0.01 ± 0.003 | 0.01 ± 0.002 | 0.02 ± 0.003 | 0.03 ± 0.01 |
| 107Ag | 0.002 ± 0.0004 | 0.002 ± 0.0001 | 0.001 ± 0.0001 | 0.002 ± 0.0005 | 0.002 ± 0.0004 | 0.001 ± 0.0005 | 0.003 ± 0.0004 |
| 202Hg | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.03 ± 0.01 |
Figure 1Score (a) and loading (b) plots of the first principal component (PC1) versus the second principal component (PC2).
Figure 2Cluster heatmap showing the element concentrations in Codonopsis Radix samples. Color scale displays the range of concentrations from low (blue) to high (red).
Figure 3Scatter plot of the first two discriminant functions of linear discriminant analysis of Codonopsis Radix samples according to their geographical origin. (a) data from all regions, (b) data from Lintao, Weiyuan, Longxi, Min, Zhang and Tanchang, (c) data from Lintao, Weiyuan, Longxi and Tanchang.
Discrimination results obtained with the different chemometrics models.
| Groups | Number of samples | LDA | RF (ntree = 1000, mtry = 16)a | SVM (C = 10, ε = 0.01)b | k-NN (k = 1)c | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Train set | Test set | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | |
| Lintao | 6 | 3 | 0.00 | 96.67 | 0.00 | 96.67 | 0.00 | 100.00 | 0.00 | 90.00 |
| Longxi | 14 | 6 | 66.67 | 85.19 | 66.67 | 96.30 | 50.00 | 81.48 | 83.33 | 88.89 |
| Min | 14 | 5 | 100.00 | 96.43 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 92.86 |
| Weiyuan | 23 | 9 | 77.78 | 91.67 | 77.78 | 79.17 | 77.78 | 87.50 | 55.56 | 100.00 |
| Wen | 12 | 5 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
| Zhang | 9 | 3 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 96.67 | 66.67 | 96.67 |
| Tanchang | 6 | 2 | 50.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 50.00 | 100.00 | 50.00 | 100.00 |
| Mean accurancy (%) | 75.76 | 78.79 | 75.76 | 72.73 | ||||||
antree number of trees, mtry number of variables tried at each split.
bC penalty factor, ε ε-insensitive loss function.
ck number of k neighbors.
Figure 4Geographical locations and number of Codonopsis Radix studied in this work (prepared by RB in ArcGIS Pro, https://www.esri.com/zh-cn/arcgis/products/arcgis-pro/resources).