Literature DB >> 35586778

Electrical Isolation Performance of Microgasket Technology for Implant Packaging.

Paritosh Rustogi1, Jack W Judy1.   

Abstract

High-channel-count neural interfaces are typically packaged by being permanently bonded to their packaged electronics followed by encapsulation. Such interfaces are often intimately integrated into neural tissue, their removal to replace the battery or upgrade electronics is not undesirable. Gaskets are widely used to provide liquid/electrical isolation and to seal the connection between two or more mating parts. Pressure-driven microgaskets are well established in the field of microfluidics. Although rematable microgaskets for fluidic interconnects exist, the use of microgaskets for electrical isolation have not been demonstrated. Our approach is to electrically isolate 2-D arrays of contact pads using a compressible silicone microgasket. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was used to quantify the electrical isolation of the microgasket on contact pads, which were formed in a polyimide flex circuit, as a function of frequency after being soaked in saline. Experiments have shown that the compressed sub-millimeter PDMSe microgasket can provide excellent isolation (i.e., >30 MΩ at 1 KHz) that is comparable to the other more conventional packaging methods, such as encapsulation in polydimethylsiloxane elastomer (PDMSe) or parylene-C. Our microgasket-based approach should be scalable to high channel counts and high channel densities enabling much smaller and higher-performance neural implants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High-Density Neural Implants; Implantable Connector; Microgaskets; Packaging; Polyimide Flex Neural Interface

Year:  2020        PMID: 35586778      PMCID: PMC9112188          DOI: 10.1109/ectc32862.2020.00251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electron Compon Technol Conf        ISSN: 2766-8401


  10 in total

Review 1.  Retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  James D Weiland; Wentai Liu; Mark S Humayun
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.590

2.  Current steering to control the volume of tissue activated during deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Christopher R Butson; Cameron C McIntyre
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Electrical connectors for neural implants: design, state of the art and future challenges of an underestimated component.

Authors:  Julia Koch; Martin Schuettler; Cristian Pasluosta; Thomas Stieglitz
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  A 232-channel retinal vision prosthesis with a miniaturized hermetic package.

Authors:  Juan S Ordonez; Martin Schuettler; Maurits Ortmanns; Thomas Stieglitz
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2012

5.  Chronic in vivo stability assessment of carbon fiber microelectrode arrays.

Authors:  Paras R Patel; Huanan Zhang; Matthew T Robbins; Justin B Nofar; Shaun P Marshall; Michael J Kobylarek; Takashi D Y Kozai; Nicholas A Kotov; Cynthia A Chestek
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Speech discrimination in deaf subjects with cochlear implants.

Authors:  D K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  3D printed high density, reversible, chip-to-chip microfluidic interconnects.

Authors:  Hua Gong; Adam T Woolley; Gregory P Nordin
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 6.799

8.  In Vitro Reactive-Accelerated-Aging Assessment of Anisotropic Conductive Adhesive and Back-End Packaging for Electronic Neural Interfaces.

Authors:  Cary A Kuliasha; Jack W Judy
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2019-07

Review 9.  Future developments in brain-machine interface research.

Authors:  Mikhail A Lebedev; Andrew J Tate; Timothy L Hanson; Zheng Li; Joseph E O'Doherty; Jesse A Winans; Peter J Ifft; Katie Z Zhuang; Nathan A Fitzsimmons; David A Schwarz; Andrew M Fuller; Je Hi An; Miguel A L Nicolelis
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  Ultraflexible nanoelectronic probes form reliable, glial scar-free neural integration.

Authors:  Lan Luan; Xiaoling Wei; Zhengtuo Zhao; Jennifer J Siegel; Ojas Potnis; Catherine A Tuppen; Shengqing Lin; Shams Kazmi; Robert A Fowler; Stewart Holloway; Andrew K Dunn; Raymond A Chitwood; Chong Xie
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 14.136

  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Microgaskets for High-Channel-Density Reconnectable Implantable Packaging.

Authors:  Paritosh Rustogi; Jack W Judy
Journal:  J Microelectromech Syst       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 2.829

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.