| Literature DB >> 35582019 |
Rahul Yadav1, Madhulika Pradhan2, Krishna Yadav3,4, Anand Mahalvar1, Homesh Yadav1.
Abstract
The current COVID-19 epidemic is a sobering reminder that human susceptibility to infectious diseases remains even in our modern civilization. After all, infectious diseases are still the major reason of death globally. Healthcare authorities have often underestimated and ignored the threat posed by "microbial dangers," although they put millions of lives at risk every year. Overlooked developing diseases including fungal infections (FIs) contribute to roughly 1.7 million fatalities per year. As many as 150 million cases of severe and potentially life-threatening FIs are reported each year. In the last few years, the number of instances has steadily increased. Most of them are invasive fungal infections that require specialized treatment and hospital care. In recent years herbal antifungal compounds have been explored to acquire effective and safe therapy against fungal infections. However, potential therapeutic effects are hampered by the poor solubility, stability, and bioavailability of these important chemicals as well as the gastric degradation that occurs in the gastrointestinal tract. To get around this issue, researchers have turned to novel drug delivery systems such as nanoemulsions, ethosomes, metallic nanoparticles, liposomes, lipid nanoparticles, transferosomes, etc by improving their limits, nanocarriers can enhance the medicinal effects of herbal oils and extracts. The present review article focuses on the available antifungal agents and their characteristics, mechanism of antifungal drugs resistance, herbal oils and extract as antifungal agents, challenges in the delivery of herbal drugs, and application of nano-drug delivery systems for effective delivery of antifungal herbal compounds.Entities:
Keywords: And nanocarriers; Antifungal compounds; Essential oils; Fungal infection; Herbal extract
Year: 2022 PMID: 35582019 PMCID: PMC9101776 DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2022.103430
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Drug Deliv Sci Technol ISSN: 1773-2247 Impact factor: 5.062
Fig. 1Mechanism of action of various antifungal drugs.
List of herbs and their antifungal potential against various fungi.
| S·N. | Name of the plant | Family | Parts used | Chemical compound | Microorganism tested | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Myrtaceae | Leaves | Sesquiterpenes, Monoterpene, hydrocarbons | [ | |||
| Myrtaceae | Leaves | beta-caryophyllene and caryophyllene oxide | [ | |||
| Zingiberaceae | Rhizome | Turmeric oil | [ | |||
| Fabaceae | seed | [ | ||||
| Asparagaceae | leaves | [ | ||||
| Anacardiaceae | Stem bark | Extract | [ | |||
| Lauraceae | Leaves | Chromene | [ | |||
| Fabaceae | Stem bark | Pyrrolidine amide | ||||
| Asteraceae | Leaves | camphene, 1,8-cineole,α- and β-thujone | [ | |||
| Mimosaceae | wood | Sesquiterpene lactone | [ | |||
| Piperaceae | Leaves | Extract | ||||
| Asteraceae | Whole plant | saponins, Polyphenols | [ | |||
| Asteraceae | Root | Extracts | [ | |||
| Zingiberaceae | Rhizomes | Steroidal saponin | [ | |||
| Solanaceae | Whole plant | Diterpenoid, Alkaloids | [ | |||
| Leguminosae | Seeds | Anthraquinone | [ | |||
| Rubiaceae | Root | Triterpene | [ | |||
| Cupressaceae | Leaves and Twigs | Isoflavone | [ | |||
| Rosaceae | Leaves | Diterpenes | [ | |||
| senecioyl | [ | |||||
| [ | ||||||
| [ | ||||||
| [ | ||||||
| [ | ||||||
| [ | ||||||
| [ |
Fig. 2Nanocarriers employed for the delivery of herbal bioactive and essential oils.
Fig. 3Antifungal activity of ZnO NPs of five different fungal species. The results are presented as mean ± standard deviation of zone of inhibition on agar plates (Adopted from Ref. [114]).
Fig. 4Antifungal activity (against A. Alternaria) of control group, chitosan solution (CH), Chitosan nanoparticles, Peganum extract (PE), CEO loaded nanoparticles (NCE), PE-CEO loaded nanoparticles (NCEP), Carum essential oil (CEO), Chlorothalonil (CLT), Negative Control (Adopted from Reference [116]).
Novel drug delivery carriers employed to encapsulate herbal antifungal extracts and essential oils.
| SN | Nanocarrier | Herbal Constituent/Extract | Test Organism | Comment | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liposomes | Garlic extract | Enhanced antifungal potential of extract loaded liposme than free extract | [ | ||
| Liposomes | α-Bisabolol in combination with Fluconazole | Liposomal bisabolol potentiated the antifungal effect of fluconazole against the test organism | [ | ||
| Liposomes | Essential Oil of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Leaf | Enhanced antifungal potential of oil loaded liposme than free oil. | [ | ||
| Nanoliposomes | Artemisia annua L. essential oil (AEO) | Minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) of pure AEO was significantly higher than AEO-loaded nanoliposomes. | [ | ||
| SLNs | Z. multiflora essential oil-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles (ZE-SLNs) | ZE-SLNs exhibited higher antifungal efficacy than ZEO. | [ | ||
| SLNs | Copaiba oil and allantoin | Improved antifungal activity of copaiba oil due to nanoencapsulation. | [ | ||
| NLCs | Palmarosa essential oil (PEO) | 100% of inhibition of fungal growth was reported. | [ | ||
| NLCs | Cinnamon Essential Oil | Significant reduction in antifungal activity | [ | ||
| AgNPs | Fruit extract of Prunus cerasifera | Broad spectrum inhibition by test formulation in comparison to standard antimicrobial drugs against organism | [ | ||
| AgNPs | Rhizophora mucronate leaves extract | Enhanced antifungal activity of fluconazole in presence of extract loaded AgNPs | [ | ||
| AgNPs | Lawsonia | Phenolic compounds showed strong | [ | ||
| AgNPs | Tropaeolum majus. | Good antifungal activity against | [ | ||
| AgNPs | Green and black tea leaves extract | Green tea or black tea leaves extracts enriched Ag-NPs showed excellent antifungal property than FeNPs | [ | ||
| Polymeric nanoparticle | Curcumin | Broad-spectrum antifungal activity was reported | [ | ||
| Lipid nanoparticle | Lippia sidoides essential oil | Enhanced antifungal activity was reported | [ |