Marie von Lilienfeld-Toal1, Johannes Wagener, Hermann Einsele, Oliver A Cornely, Oliver Kurzai. 1. National Reference Center for Invasive Fungal Infections, Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology - Hans Knöll Institute (HKI), Jena; Clinic of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Jena; Institute for Hygiene and Microbiology, University of Würzburg, Chair of Medical Microbiology and Mycology, Würzburg; Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Würzburg; InfectControl 2020, Jena/Würzburg; Cologne Excellence Cluster on Cellular Stress Responses in Aging-Associated Diseases (CECAD), Department I of Internal Medicine, at the University Hospital of Cologne, European Excellence Center for Medical Mycology (ECMM), DGerman Center for Infection Research(DZIF) Partner Site Bonn Köln, Cologne University.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The incidence of invasive fungal infection is approximately 6 cases per 100 000 persons per year. It is estimated that only half of such infections are detected during the patient's lifetime, making this one of the more common overlooked causes of death in intensive-care patients. The low detection rate is due in part to the complexity of the diagnostic work-up, in which the clinical, radiological, and microbiological findings must be considered. Fungi with resistance to antimycotic drugs have been found to be on the rise around the world. METHODS: This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved from a selective search in PubMed, with special attention to guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of invasive fungal infections caused by Candida spp., Aspergillus spp., Mucorales, and Fusarium spp. RESULTS: The clinical risk factors for invasive fungal infection include, among others, congenital immune deficiency, protracted (>10 days) marked granulocytopenia (<0.5 x 109/L), allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, and treatment with immunosuppressive drugs or corticosteroids. High-risk groups include patients in intensive care and those with structural pulmonary disease and/or compli- cated influenza. The first line of treatment, supported by the findings of randomized clinical trials, consists of echinocandins for in- fections with Candida spp. (candidemia response rates: 75.6% for anidulafungin vs. 60.2% for fluconazole) and azole antimycotic drugs for infections with Aspergillus spp. (response rates: 52.8% for voriconazole vs. 31.6% for conventional amphotericin B). The recommended first-line treatment also depends on the local epidemiology. This challenge should be met by interdisciplinary collaboration. Therapeutic decision-making should also take account of the often severe undesired effects of antimycotic drugs (including impairment of hepatic and/or renal function) and the numerous interactions that some of them have with other drugs. CONCLUSION: Invasive fungal infections are often overlooked in routine hospital care. They should be incorporated into antimicro- bial stewardship programs as an essential component. There is also a pressing need for the development of new classes of antimycotic drug.
BACKGROUND: The incidence of invasive fungal infection is approximately 6 cases per 100 000 persons per year. It is estimated that only half of such infections are detected during the patient's lifetime, making this one of the more common overlooked causes of death in intensive-care patients. The low detection rate is due in part to the complexity of the diagnostic work-up, in which the clinical, radiological, and microbiological findings must be considered. Fungi with resistance to antimycotic drugs have been found to be on the rise around the world. METHODS: This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved from a selective search in PubMed, with special attention to guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of invasive fungal infections caused by Candida spp., Aspergillus spp., Mucorales, and Fusarium spp. RESULTS: The clinical risk factors for invasive fungal infection include, among others, congenital immune deficiency, protracted (>10 days) marked granulocytopenia (<0.5 x 109/L), allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, and treatment with immunosuppressive drugs or corticosteroids. High-risk groups include patients in intensive care and those with structural pulmonary disease and/or compli- cated influenza. The first line of treatment, supported by the findings of randomized clinical trials, consists of echinocandins for in- fections with Candida spp. (candidemia response rates: 75.6% for anidulafungin vs. 60.2% for fluconazole) and azole antimycotic drugs for infections with Aspergillus spp. (response rates: 52.8% for voriconazole vs. 31.6% for conventional amphotericin B). The recommended first-line treatment also depends on the local epidemiology. This challenge should be met by interdisciplinary collaboration. Therapeutic decision-making should also take account of the often severe undesired effects of antimycotic drugs (including impairment of hepatic and/or renal function) and the numerous interactions that some of them have with other drugs. CONCLUSION:Invasive fungal infections are often overlooked in routine hospital care. They should be incorporated into antimicro- bial stewardship programs as an essential component. There is also a pressing need for the development of new classes of antimycotic drug.
Authors: Raoul Herbrecht; David W Denning; Thomas F Patterson; John E Bennett; Reginald E Greene; Jörg-W Oestmann; Winfried V Kern; Kieren A Marr; Patricia Ribaud; Olivier Lortholary; Richard Sylvester; Robert H Rubin; John R Wingard; Paul Stark; Christine Durand; Denis Caillot; Eckhard Thiel; Pranatharthi H Chandrasekar; Michael R Hodges; Haran T Schlamm; Peter F Troke; Ben de Pauw Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-08-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: A J Ullmann; J M Aguado; S Arikan-Akdagli; D W Denning; A H Groll; K Lagrou; C Lass-Flörl; R E Lewis; P Munoz; P E Verweij; A Warris; F Ader; M Akova; M C Arendrup; R A Barnes; C Beigelman-Aubry; S Blot; E Bouza; R J M Brüggemann; D Buchheidt; J Cadranel; E Castagnola; A Chakrabarti; M Cuenca-Estrella; G Dimopoulos; J Fortun; J-P Gangneux; J Garbino; W J Heinz; R Herbrecht; C P Heussel; C C Kibbler; N Klimko; B J Kullberg; C Lange; T Lehrnbecher; J Löffler; O Lortholary; J Maertens; O Marchetti; J F Meis; L Pagano; P Ribaud; M Richardson; E Roilides; M Ruhnke; M Sanguinetti; D C Sheppard; J Sinkó; A Skiada; M J G T Vehreschild; C Viscoli; O A Cornely Journal: Clin Microbiol Infect Date: 2018-03-12 Impact factor: 8.067
Authors: Barbara D Alexander; Melissa D Johnson; Christopher D Pfeiffer; Cristina Jiménez-Ortigosa; Jelena Catania; Rachel Booker; Mariana Castanheira; Shawn A Messer; David S Perlin; Michael A Pfaller Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Markus Ruhnke; Andreas H Groll; Peter Mayser; Andrew J Ullmann; Werner Mendling; Herbert Hof; David W Denning Journal: Mycoses Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 4.377
Authors: Ralph Dean; Jan A L Van Kan; Zacharias A Pretorius; Kim E Hammond-Kosack; Antonio Di Pietro; Pietro D Spanu; Jason J Rudd; Marty Dickman; Regine Kahmann; Jeff Ellis; Gary D Foster Journal: Mol Plant Pathol Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 5.663
Authors: Matthew C Fisher; Daniel A Henk; Cheryl J Briggs; John S Brownstein; Lawrence C Madoff; Sarah L McCraw; Sarah J Gurr Journal: Nature Date: 2012-04-11 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Mariska M G Leeflang; Yvette J Debets-Ossenkopp; Junfeng Wang; Caroline E Visser; Rob J P M Scholten; Lotty Hooft; Henk A Bijlmer; Johannes B Reitsma; Mingming Zhang; Patrick M M Bossuyt; Christina M Vandenbroucke-Grauls Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2015-12-30
Authors: Anita H Sung; Stephan Martin; Bryant Phan; Michael Benigno; Jennifer Stephens; Richard Chambers; Jalal A Aram Journal: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Date: 2021-06-25
Authors: Carmen Kirchner; Jasmin Sibai; Elke Schwier; Dietrich Henzler; Claas Eickmeyer; Günther Winde; Thomas Köhler Journal: Case Rep Crit Care Date: 2019-12-26