| Literature DB >> 34589544 |
Abstract
The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the effect of the combined crude extract, fractions, and compound 1 isolated from the fruits of Datura metel against selected microbial (bacteria and fungi) strains. Results of antibacterial screening indicated marked susceptibility of the extract and its fractions against tested bacterial strains. Among the extract and various fractions, the chloroform fraction exhibited a significant effect against different bacterial strains including Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Bacillus subtilis with an inhibitory zone ranging from 18 to 24 mm. Similarly, results of antifungal activity revealed that the chloroform fraction displays a promising effect against various fungal strains. The chloroform fraction was subjected to repeated chromatography analysis, which yielded compound 1 (daturaolone). Daturaolone exhibited potent activity against selected bacterial strains including Klebsiella pneumoniae, B. subtilis, S. epidermidis, and S. aureus with an inhibitory zone ranging from 12 to 30 mm. In addition, the extracts and daturaolone exhibited significant sensitivity against T. longifusus, C. albicans, A. flavus, M. canis, F. solani, and C. glabrata. Taken all together, it is concluded that our findings validated the traditional use of D. metel to treat various infectious diseases, which is supported by daturaolone.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34589544 PMCID: PMC8476240 DOI: 10.1155/2021/1543574
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1Structure and X-ray crystallographic image of compound 1 isolated from D. metel.
Antibacterial effect (zone of inhibition in mm) of the crude extract/fractions and daturaolone isolated from D. metel fruits.
| Bacteria species | Zone of inhibition in mm | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Hexane | Chloroform | EtOAC | Methanol | Daturaolone | Imipenem | |
|
| 0 ± 0.00 | 0 ± 0.00 | 18 ± 1.44 | 12 ± 1.46 | 16.2 ± 1.23 | 25.05 ± 0.18 | 28.24 ± 0.08 |
|
| 0 ± 0.00 | 0 ± 0.00 | 0 ± 0.00 | 0 ± 0.00 | 0 ± 0.00 | 12.45 ± 00 | 32.66 ± 0.09 |
|
| 0 ± 0.00 | 0 ± 0.00 | 0 ± 0.00 | 12.98 ± 1.08 | 18.21 ± 1.90 | 18.98 ± 0.40 | 30.76 ± 0.12 |
|
| 0 ± 0.00 | 8.01 ± 1.44 | 18.65 ± 1.40 | 10.34 ± 1.44 | 13.80 ± 1.34 | 20.32 ± 0.38 | 32.87 ± 0.18 |
|
| 0 ± 0.00 | 6.08 ± 1.20 | 24.29 ± 1.48 | 8.65 ± 1.49 | 10.21 ± 1.98 | 30.08 ± 0.39 | 34.87 ± 0.30 |
Data are presented as the mean ± SEM of three sets of individual assays in every column. Standard (imipenem 1 mg), well size 6 mm, and tested sample (2 mg/mL).
The MIC of the crude extract, various fractions, and daturaolone isolated from D. metel fruits.
| Bacteria species | MIC ( | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Chloroform | EtOAC | Methanol | Daturaolone | Imipenem | ||
|
| — | — | 143.21 ± 2.00 | — | 160.23 ± 2.65 | 2.39 ± 1.00 | 0.18 ± 0.00 |
|
| — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.19 ± 0.04 |
|
| — | — | — | — | 153.21 ± 2.54 | 28.22 ± 1.88 | 0.20 ± 0.06 |
|
| — | — | 144.32 ± 2.01 | — | — | 20.11 ± 1.23 | 0.19 ± 0.02 |
|
| — | — | 12.98 ± 1.64 | — | — | 0.43 ± 0.34 | 0.21 ± 0.04 |
Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM of three sets of individual assays in every column.
Antifungal effect (zone of inhibition in mm) of the crude extract, different fractions, and daturaolone isolated from D. metel fruits.
| Fungal species | % zone of inhibition | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloroform | EtOAC | Methanol | Daturaolone | Standard | MIC ( | ||
|
| — | — | — | — | — | Miconazole | 108.23 ± 1.21 |
|
| — | — | — | — | — | Miconazole | 21.56 ± 1.15 |
|
| — | 24.23 ± 2.88 | — | 20.20 ± 2.96 | 36.77 ± 1.10 | Amphotericin B | 98.98 ± 0.80 |
|
| 12.87 ± 2.87 | 28.98 ± 2.00 | 16.23 ± 1.87 | 25.32 ± 1.45 | 38.98 ± 1.00 | Miconazole | 73.34 ± 0.64 |
|
| — | 22.98 ± 1.98 | — | 16.11 ± 2.88 | 32.98 ± 1.60 | Miconazole | 110.12 ± 0.23 |
|
| — | — | — | — | — | Miconazole | 108.23 ± 0.06 |
Results are expressed as the mean ± SEM of three sets of individual assays in every column.