| Literature DB >> 35565970 |
Sara Brunello1, Nicola Salvarese1, Debora Carpanese2, Carolina Gobbi3, Laura Melendez-Alafort2, Cristina Bolzati1.
Abstract
Recently, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has gained momentum in tumor nuclear molecular imaging as an excellent target for both the diagnosis and therapy of prostate cancer. Since 2008, after years of preclinical research efforts, a plentitude of radiolabeled compounds mainly based on low molecular weight PSMA inhibitors (PSMA-i) have been described for imaging and theranostic applications, and some of them have been transferred to the clinic. Most of these compounds include radiometals (e.g., 68Ga, 64Cu, 177Lu) for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging or endoradiotherapy. Nowadays, although the development of new PET tracers has caused a significant drop in single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) research programs and the development of new technetium-99m (99mTc) tracers is rare, this radionuclide remains the best atom for SPECT imaging owing to its ideal physical decay properties, convenient availability, and rich and versatile coordination chemistry. Indeed, 99mTc still plays a relevant role in diagnostic nuclear medicine, as the number of clinical examinations based on 99mTc outscores that of PET agents and 99mTc-PSMA SPECT/CT may be a cost-effective alternative for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. This review aims to give an overview of the specific features of the developed [99mTc]Tc-tagged PSMA agents with particular attention to [99mTc]Tc-PSMA-i. The chemical and pharmacological properties of the latter will be compared and discussed, highlighting the pros and cons with respect to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA11.Entities:
Keywords: PSMA; SPECT; gallium-68; molecular imaging; nanoparticles; prostate cancer; target-specific; technetium-99m
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35565970 PMCID: PMC9099988 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27092617
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1Word incidence rates of prostate cancer in 2020.
Figure 2Graphical representation of the dual nature of PSMA biomarker. PSMA consists of three domains: an intracellular domain with 18 amino acids (light blue), a transmembrane region with 24 amino acids (purple), which inserts into the phospholipid bilayer, and a catalytic domain in which there are 707 amino acids (pink) containing the active site with two zinc ions. On the right side, it is possible to appreciate the zoom of the cavity of the active site with a generic PSMA-i ligand in which the portions of the inhibitor that interact with specific entities of the receptor pocket are highlighted (created in BioRender).
Figure 3Chemical representation of selected labeled and unlabeled PSMA-i derivatives. PSMA-i pharmacophore is evidenced in color.
Pros and cons of the use of Technetium-99m radionuclide vs. Gallium-68 and Indium-111 radionuclides.
| 99mTc (SPECT) | 68Ga (PET) | 111In (SPECT) |
|---|---|---|
Figure 4Protein expression of PSMA in cancer tissues, neovascularization of cancer, and healthy tissues, along with the RNA expression in healthy tissues, obtained by combined information from the Human Protein Atlas and data from the literature.
Figure 5Representation of the biFuntional approach. By this approach, an RP can be described as mainly composed of two essential parts: the targeting vector, i.e., the molecule or macromolecule that drives the radiometal to the pertinent molecular target, and the chelating system (also known as the BiFuntional Chelator, (BFC) designed to promptly and robustly bind the metal radionuclide, preventing it’s in vivo leakage, and to carry another reactive group able to form a strong covalent bond with the targeting vector, thus yielding a kinetically and thermodynamically stable construct. These two parts are directly bound or are held together by an appropriate linker or pharmacokinetic modifier (PKM). The final compound (bioconjugate complex) is then obtained through the appropriate labeling procedure, which depends on the specific radiometal.
Summary of features of Technetium-99m labeling approaches.
| Tc(V) Oxo/Dioxo Core | Tc(V)-HYNIC | Tc(I)-Tricarbonyl | [Tc(V)N(PNP)]2+ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Tetradentate; N2S2 N3S, N4 | EDDA/Tricine; N2O2 | Bi- or Tridentate; His-based ligands, polyamino-polycarboxylate, polyamines, aromatic and aliphatic amines, cyclopentadienyl ligands | Bidentate; Cys-based ligands [H2NS]−, [OS]2− |
|
| Difficult, potentially stressful for the molecular vector. Tetradentate ligand utilizes a carboxylic acid side-group to link biomolecules. Such ligands can be conjugated via carboxylic acids (COOH), amino (NH2), and thiocyanate (NCS) groups to biomolecules. | Easy, bioconjugate chemistry. | Easy bioconjugate chemistry. The His-based chelator can be readily incorporated into the peptide chain by using traditional automated synthesis (peptides) or His-tag (proteins). | Easy, bioconjugate chemistry. |
|
| One-step | Two-step | One or Two-step | One or two-step |
|
| Heating (75–100 °C) | Heating (60–100 °C) or RT | Generally heating (75–100 °C). | Heating (80–100 °C) or RT |
|
| No, very difficult if necessary | No, easy if needed | No, easy if needed | No, easy if needed |
|
| Yes | No, difficult | Yes | Yes |
|
| Yes, two isomers (syn, anti) separable and individually evaluable. | Yes, several isomeric forms, not separable and not individually evaluable. | Potentially yes. | Yes, two isomers (syn, anti) separable and individually evaluable, having the same affinity for the target. |
|
| Generally stable | Stable | Very stable | Very stable |
|
| Low, minimal variation of chelator backbone or by modification/insertion of PKM | Medium by chemical modification of Tricine and EDDA or by insertion or modification of a PKM | Medium by chemical variation of the chelator and modification/insertion of PKM | High by chemical modification of the substituent on PNP, variation of chelator and modification/insertion of PKM |
|
| One vial | One vial | One/two vials | Two vials |
|
| Yes | No | Yes | Yes |
Figure 6Chemical sketches of DUPA and PSMA-i. (A,B) Glu-Ureo-based PSMA inhibitors conjugated through a spacer (in orange) to a so-called Bifunctional Chelating Agent (BFCA).
Figure 7(A) Amino acids of the active site of the PSMA enzyme (GCPII) interacting with the ligand PSMA 1007 (PDB code 5O5T, in light-blue). S1 pocket (‘’non-pharmacophore pocket’’) with its arginine patch is indicated in green. It is specific for binding to the NAA (N-acetyl-aspartyl-) portion of NAAG (or the NAA-like- portion of PSMA-i) through polar or nonpolar interaction [112]. In orange is highlighted the S1′ pocket, which specifically binds C-terminal glutamate residue. S1 is a flexible funnel specific for negatively charged amino acids which improve the interaction between PSMA and their inhibitors; its flexibility enables the binding of a variety of groups, which are not essential to the determination of the affinity [113]. (B) The active site of the PSMA receptor in which amino acids deputy to stabilize zinc ions are colored in red, whereas the side chains of Arg463, Arg511 and Trp54, forming the “arene-binding site”, are colored in yellow. The latter define the entrance of GCPII [114]. The images are created using UCSF Chimera 1.14.
Figure 8Chemical representation of the Tc-moieties utilized in developing [99mTc]Tc-housed PSMA-i.
PSMA-i labeled with [99mTc][Tc(CO)3]+-fragment.
| Chelator Linker Scaffold | Affinity | Performance | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| a 10.75 (1) | Complexes were evaluated on PC3-PIP/PC3-flu xenografts. | [ |
|
|
| b 15.25 | Complexes were evaluated on PC3-PIP/PC3-flu xenografts. | [ |
|
|
| c 4.35 ± 0.35 (11) | Complexes were investigated on LNCaP/PC3 xenografts. High and stable tumor uptake ranged from 9.3 to 12.4% ID/g at 1 h | [ |
a PSMA inhibitory affinity was determined using the corresponding rhenium complexes. Data are reported as *Ki (nM); b PSMA inhibitory affinity was determined by using the ligands, and data are reported as Ki (nM). c Binding specificity of 99mTc-labeled PSMA-i was determined by saturation binding analysis in the presence of the corresponding rhenium compound or 2-PMPA. Data are reported as Kd (nM).
PSMA-i labeled with [99mTc][Tc(CO)3]+-fragment in a multivalent approach.
| Chelator/Linker/Scaffold | Affinity | Performance | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| a 5.50 ± 0.99 (15) | Complexes were investigated on 22Rv1 xenografts. Moderate PSMA-dependent tumor uptake 1.87 ± 0.11% ID/g, at 1 h | [ |
|
| b 8.79 (17) | Complexes were investigated on LNCaP xenografts. PSMA mediated tumor uptake: 4.86 ± 1.19% ID/g at 1 h | [ |
a PSMA inhibitory affinity was determined using the corresponding technetium-99m complexes. Data are reported as KD (nM). 22Rv1 are PSMA-positive human prostate carcinoma epithelial cells, which have moderate PSMA expression [19,120]. b The binding affinity to PSMA of the unlabeled CNGU ligand was performed by using NAALADase assay on LNCaP cell lysates. Data are reported as the enzyme inhibitory constant (Ki nM).
PSMA-i labeled with [99mTc][TcO]3+-core.
| Chelator/Linker | Scaffold | Affinity | Performance | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| a 176 (1) | Complexes were evaluated on LNCaP xenografts. High and stable PSMA-dependent tumor uptake (11.2% ID/g at 4 h | [ |
|
|
|
| Complexes were evaluated on PC3-PIP/PC3-flu xenografts. | [ | |
|
|
|
| c 47.6 ± 2.5 (15) | [TcO] | [ |
a PSMA inhibitory affinity was determined by using the technetium-99m complexes. Data are reported as KD (nM); b PSMA inhibitory affinity was determined by using the ligands, and data are reported as Ki (nM). c PSMA inhibitory affinity was determined by using the corresponding NatRe complexes, data are reported as IC50 (nM).
PSMA-i labeled with [99mTc][Tc-HYNIC]2+-core.
| HYNIC-PSMA-i Scaffold | Affinity | Performance Clinical Translation | Ref. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| a 1.74 | Complexes were evaluated on PC3-PIP/PC3-flu xenografts. | [ |
|
|
| n.d | Complex was evaluated on LNCaP/PC3 xenografts. High and stable PSMA-dependent tumor uptake (9.84 ± 2.63%I D/g at 3 h | [ |
|
|
|
| Complex was evaluated on LNCaP/PC3 xenografts. High and stable PSMA-dependent tumor uptake (19.45 ± 2.14% ID/g at 2 h | [ |
|
|
| b 13.58 | Complexes were evaluated on LNCaP/PC3 xenografts. | [ |
|
|
| c 80 (7) | Complex was evaluated in healthy BALB/C mice. No data on LNCaP/PC3 xenografts were reported. Reduced kidney uptake (37.5 ± 9.5) at 4 h | [ |
a PSMA inhibitory affinity was determined using the ligand, data are reported as Ki (nM); b PSMA inhibitory affinity was determined by using the corresponding technetium-99m complexes. Data are reported as KD (nM). c PSMA inhibitory affinity was determined by using the ligand precursor in competition studies, data are reported as IC50 (nM).
Figure 9General structure of the SAAC Lys-based bifunctional chelator and corresponding Re complexes.
Figure 10Coating ligands and radiolabeled PSMA-i derivatized NPs designed by Felber and coworkers.
Figure 11Putative structures of [99mTc]Tc-tagged-PSMA-i under clinical investigation.
Formulation, indication, advantages and disadvantages of [99mTc]Tc-PSMA RPs under clinical investigations.
|
|
|
|
|
| Two-vial kit formulation, the composition and the procedure were not deeply described. Labeling: 1° step NaTcO4(40 mCi/1 mL saline) was added to the Isolink vial. Heat to 95 °C for 30 min. 2° Step: pH was adjusted to 7.5 with HCl.; PSMA-i (0.100 mg) was added. Heat to 95 °C for 30 min. Voltot= n.d RCY 85%. Purification: by HPLC RCP ≥ 98%. Specific activity: 37 TBq/mmol. | Useful to assist in the initial diagnosis of PCa, the monitoring of disease progression and the response to the therapeutic treatment by SPECT imaging. | ||
|
| One vial: SnCl2, tartrate, PB pH 8, PSMA-I&S (35–40 µg). Labeling: NaTcO4 (20–30 mCi/1–5 mL), was added to the vial. pH 7.5–8, heat to 90 °C for 20 min. RCY 99%. Diluted to 10 mL. | Useful to localize small metastases of PCa and to perform RGS with the main advantage of the immediate confirmation and removal of metastasis prior of the histological analysis. Superior substitute of 111In PSMA-I&T. | |
|
| Two-vial kit formulation. 1 lyophilized vial: SnCl2 (0.020 mg), EDDA (20 mg), tricine (40.8 mg) mannitol (0.102 mg), HYNIC-PSMA-i (0.102 mg). 2° vial: Phosphate Buffer, 0.2 M pH 7. Labelling: to vial 1 was added PB (1 mL) and NaTcO4 (20–30 mCi/1.0 mL). Heat to 95 °C for 10 min. RCY ≥ 98%. | Useful to assist in the initial diagnosis of PCa and the monitoring of disease progression. by SPECT imaging. | |
|
| HYNIC-ALUG (0.010 mg), EDDA (0.5 mL of 20 mg/mL in 0.1 M NaOH solution), Tricine (0.5 mL of 40 mg/mL in PBS 0.2 M, pH = 6.0). NaTcO4 (50 mCi/1.0 mL). SnCl2 (50 μL of 1 mg/mL in 0.1 M HCl solution). Heat to 100 °C for 15 min. Voltot = 2.050 mL RCY ≥ 98%. | Useful to assist in the initial diagnosis of PCa and the monitoring of disease progression by SPECT imaging. This is also proposed for RGS. | |
|
| Sterile and apyrogenic freeze-dry kit: PSMA-T4 (20 mg), Tricine (50 mg), EDDA (5 mg), SnCl2 (40 mg), Na2HPO4x12H2O (29 mg),/NaH2PO4x2H2O (3.0 mg). Labelling: NaTcO4 (20–30 mCi/1.0–2.5 mL). Heat to 95 °C, 10 min. RCY ≥ 95%. | Useful to assist in the initial diagnosis of PCa and the monitoring of disease progression. Suitable for RGS and for identification/assessment of PSMA+ lesions before consideration of radioligand therapy. |
Figure 12Schematic drawing of bimodal hybrid tracer based on fluorescent Cy5 dye.